What Is History? | Historian Essentials | Casual Historian

preview_player
Показать описание
Support this channel on Patreon

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Good point about history being the only subject that can be applied to every other.

StefanMilo
Автор

I always like to define it as "the story of us." Afterall, the etymology for _story_ and _history_ are the same.
Essential idea - difference between primary and secondary (plus tertiary) sources

CynicalHistorian
Автор

My wife got her degree in public history, so I think it'd be pretty cool to talk about that and how it differs from "academic" history since it's a relatively new profession.

ProfessorPolitics
Автор

Keep going dude! Revisionism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Structuralism, Empiricists, Rationalists! Please keep going : )

peterdewell
Автор

Do a video on the types of Historians.

Orange_Laowai
Автор

When I was in high school, I was abysmal at history. My teacher would call on me because it was almost guaranteed that I would not know the answer. One day, he ask a question about something that had never been covered in class, and he didn't expect anyone to know the answer, least of all me. His question was "What was the name of the plane that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima?" When I told him it was the Enola Gay he picked his jaw off the floor and said "I'm not asking you any questions any more!" As it happens, I liked Mr. Carter quite a bit, even though I was abysmal at history. I liked him much better than I liked his wife, who taught at the same school. It wasn't that I hated her, it was just that we tended to strike sparks, like flint and steel. My biggest problem when it comes to history is putting events together with dates.

StarSong
Автор

Couldn't language be applied to all subjects?

christiandevey
Автор

WHAT IS *history* BABY DON'T HURT ME DON'T HURT ME NO MORE

christiandevey
Автор

Memerlukan lebih ramai orang jadi sebarkan video ini lebih banyak

aewnamen
Автор

🤔. ??? This channel is actually good Very objective and only expose the evidence. Without taking sides. Good work.

EngelsFermin
Автор

Can't tell what is being said: "chroniclers" are...or aren't very common these days? Which is it, please?

leannepoole
Автор

It seems like philosophy would be applicable to every field of study as well.

codyabshire
Автор

yra chashmodina! drna zar sham. da assignment likalo na d khlass krm der me khwakh shve pa khudai bawar oka bsss...

msohaib_rumi
Автор

Absolutely disagree that an historian would not come up against a detail in a chemical equation or contents of a study of any kind. Example: Scientist A's biography tells us that he modified the 3rd ingredient in the formula for pencil erasers in 1901. Scientist B seems to be using that formula in 1927. Scientist C, 1934, decided against the compound of 1901 because a particular rubber tree was no longer available, though in 1927 it was still possible to obtain. What is the subject? The History of the Pencil Eraser, with detailed notes, Chapter 7, 'Compounds of Yesterday'.

leannepoole