Is This Scientist CONVINCED the Bible is True?

preview_player
Показать описание
Geologist Dr. Andrew Snelling provides some of the reasons his research supports the historical accuracy of the Bible. From the documentary "Is Genesis History?" Watch the full film on YouTube.

#isgenesishistory #youngearth #geology #creationism #genesis #christianity #christian #religion #science #faith #creationscience #apologetics #andrewsnelling #earthscience
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Genesis is the true history of the world. Is Genesis history? Yes. 100%

TJforChrist
Автор

Psalm 119:160 KJV — Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever.

lionelbradley
Автор

This is an interesting result because the 3 methods shown overlap. I see some YEC (I'm one myself) use really bad comparisons where the instruments have date cut-offs and they still compare them. An example would be comparing the ages given for C-14 and U-Pb. C-14 can only go up to 100k years and U-Pb can only start at 1 million years.

So, it would be like measuring a football field with a 12-inch ruler or a hair with a yard stick. You have to select the right sized ruler for the task at hand. Comparing these three methods is much more valid, so it's awesome to see it still gives wildly different results.

defendingalion
Автор

ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL 😍 ABSOLUTELY POWERFUL 😍 ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT AND GOD BLESS US ALL 🙏 AND KEEP UP THE GOOD FIGHT 👍 ❤ 🙏

JavierLara-ie
Автор

Why then are the dates so consistent taken from multiple sites and why do they form such a coherent picture of deep time?

speleoth
Автор

The bible is not an account of the physical world. If you read it like that, you are missing the mark. It is a spiritual book and must be read that way to get the actual benefits.

mannymann
Автор

Spent 8 years beliving the same nonsense he believed in the first place. 😂

PsiRipples
Автор

Of course the really curious thing, is if the data from the carbon is just a random "measurement error", and not from process, then why is the "error" so large. Why are there no data points closer to the 6000 year figure? Why are they way off? Unless you are publically accusing the scientists of "libel".

kennethswenson
Автор

this scientists believe it's true but Millions upon millions of other ones don't... I guess they forgot to leave out that detail! LOL

JustMe-mnhk