I'm Arresting You For Not Providing Your Details 😲😱👮‍♂️🎥🛸❌

Today we take a a look at a road which has been cordoned off by Police.

Upon arrival it was not known of the suspected crime so we tried to work it out.

We ask the PCSO controlling the cordon where the boundary was and then took the drone up for a look around.

Twice during the flight we was interrupted, the second time was by PC 4692 and PS 4381.

I wasn't impressed with the PC and PS so things started to go downhill.

Eventually, I was arrested after refusing to provide my details.

Shortly after I was de arrested and given 7 Days to provide my details.

(as the FLYER ID is not required for my size of Drone, I believed, and still believe now that I DID NOT need to provide my ID - I am obtaining clarification from the CAA about this which will be shown in a future video)

Bodycam was filming the entire time so we hear everything on this one.

We end the video with some advice to PC and PS and then the Drone Footage at the very end.

Enjoy!
____________________________________________

Q - What is your email address?

Q - What Drone Do I Use
A - DJI MINI 2
Can be purchased here -

Q - What Camera Do I Use
A - DJI OSMO POCKET 2
Can be purchased here -

[miksyezpatelik]

I'm a retired police officer, and I am appalled by the ignorance of those officers, particularly the idiot who is allegedly a sergeant.
He has no idea about the laws identifying 'suspects' and he has no idea of the laws relating the use of drones.
The detention was completely unlawful, and well done to the cameras man for not providing his drivers licence.
THE REAL PROBLEM TODAY IS THAT THE POLICE ARE TERRIFIED OF CAMERAS, AND CANNOT COPE WHEN LAW ABIDING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TELL THEM HOW THE LAW ACTUALLY WORKS.
YET THE COURTS AND SENIOR POLICE MANAGEMENT HAVE STATED THAT PUBLIC PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ILLEGAL.
YET THE MORONS EMPLOYED IN THE POLICE THESE DAYS CONTINUE TO BULLY THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THEY CANT GET THEIR OWN WAY.

The sergeant had finally resort to apologising, but then told the cameraman that he had to provide his 'permit ' for the drone within 7 days.
The requirement to produce documents within 7 days applies to matter under THE ROAD TRAFFIC ACT . That sergeant is just another ignorant bully
The other officer with him is nothing less that a prick with ears.

[gemgal]

Using handcuffs on a person who hasn't committed to crime is an abuse of power and excessive force.

[JP-rvhg]

These 2 cops are really examples of police recruitment hitting the bottom of the barrel …

[inter-linked]

“I’ll talk to you in 5 minutes mate” - that was gold.

[judithmatthews]

These police sadly have an institutional belief that people should instantly obey their rules and never bother to follow their own rules. That's disrespectful and drives a wedge between the police and the public. These officers approach was antagonistic based on assumption that any person with a camera is a foe..Assumption is fatal to any true investigator. The sergeant wasn't very bright (sorry) his communication skills dire and his knowledge of the law limited. The other officer is more problematic antagonistic, ill informed no people skills. He seems more suited to being a pub bouncer.

[monkeysaur]

The law is very clear on this. You only have to provide your details if you are being arrested or reported for an offense. Not giving your details is a secondary offense only, and cannot, alone, be the grounds for an arrest. It is not an offense in and of itself.

[kal]

That Sargent at 10:33 was an utter tool. From the moment he walked up it was obvious he would cause issues. His body and verbal language reeked of belligerence. Doesn't like being told no, and just can't help himself getting the last word in or being challenged.
He says he didn't step over to you, but over the course of the first minute of you both talking about how long until you land he leans in, then shuffles up to you about 4 times, each time you step back and he does it again. Leans in to you, but then doesn't lean back, but shuffles forward.

He's a liar, a creep, not listening to anything you say. Would probably gaslight anyone without cameras to cover his own arse. It's dangerous to put anyone like that in a position of power over anyone, the ignorance, combined with the belligerence, lack of self-awareness, propensity to lie, the constant passive aggressive tone, and the snap when he actually arrested you.... Get him away from any job with power or authority before he hurts someone!

[DidesCharlie]

DJ : "five minutes and you can talk". Pause...pause... "so, do you live locally round here then?". Fell on floor laughing. Impeccable comic timing.

[dashford]

Their arrest was purely retaliatory; they were frustrated you were pointing out their rules violations (cameras, etc.) and generally showing the world their abject ignorance of the laws they are supposed to enforce. So they put handcuffs on you, just to retaliate and humiliate you. Shameful behavior.

[Graham]

I can see why the station sent these Officers to stand in a field.

[Cj-zjjf]

The sargeant has been promoted beyond the limit of his capability. He hasn't got a clue, he is arrogant and was determined to get you for something. Abuse of power and ignorance.

[davidwood]

Never been in trouble with the law in my life but at 51 years of age I was assaulted by a policeman in Oxford demanding my information and my phone details and home address over an alleged charge that wasn’t me, after bruising on my arm I wish now I had made a complaint against him, too late I guess but I no longer have respect for the police or the little bully boys that they enlist 👎

[marklatimer]

It's like telling a 5 year old to be quiet for 2 minutes, it just never happens.
I assume this type of bullying approach normally works for them, when it fails they are completely lost .

[alanjones]

*THE SERGEANT WAS COMPLETLY CONFUSED AND SHOULD NOT BE IN A POSITION OF TRUST TO DEAL WITH THESE INTERACTIONS*
*I FEEL THAT POLICE WHO DO WRONGDOING SHOULD BE PENALISED, THIS WAY THEY WILL FINALY GET EDUCATED*

[keving]

This is an all too common thing now, that you don't actually deal with the police, you're dealing with their ego. They need way more reports against them.

[hughiecarins-ogjs]

You are not required by law to carry any ID these cops need to learn the law.

[robrl]

I've finally found out what the cordon was for after speaking to locals. A member of staff at the ASDA store nearby was seen to be moving several trays of doughnuts from the confectionery aisle to the reduced price shelves. The police were on it straight away, sealing off the area.

[KingRagnar]

These officers prove exactly why we need the auditors.
What a joke 😂😂

[thomasdoran]

Its shocking how little they know about law - but how eager they are to get violent !
Disgraceful, shameful employees - unemployable elsewhere, except in this sector, where ignorance, aggression and thuggery is encouraged !
Thats why the police are hated & despised !

[EhButU]

4381 Sergeant didn't state that he was recording either (or did I miss that), he hardly looks at the info offered showing that flyer ID not needed, and says you are free to go, no issues but minutes later is arresting over same points already covered - not providing a flyer ID that was established as not needed. Bullying tactics and wrongful arrest.