BREAKING: Trump Lawyer Makes Argument To Appeal $454 Million NYC Civil Fraud Verdict | Full Hearing

preview_player
Показать описание
A New York appeals court holds a hearing for oral arguments in the appeal of former President Trump's $454 million civil fraud verdict.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The purpose of statutes of limitations is there to stop people like this from harassing citizens for the rest of their lives.

LCS-ly
Автор

NY Appeals Court? Good luck with this.

misterwallace
Автор

-22:24 start here to see the question the judges ask to the see how AG does not answer the question which the judges asked her to site any previous cases that existed as a precedent for the case brought in this instance before the court today.

mcshllymc
Автор

I am not even American and from the outside the rest of the world can see these court cases are political and a waste of your hard earned tax payers money .

corysorenson
Автор

Why is the lady from the NYAG office YELLING at the judges?

TheFrogfeeder
Автор

I'm still in shock over how EJC was taken seriously and given an 83 million dollar settlement mainly for "defamation." Are men not allowed to deny false charges and call a woman a lunatic if she's making baseless outrageous claims?

1) She has an established history of targeting wealthy men with false rape allegations in her past.

2) She can't even remember what decade the "assault" happened in. A true victim of SA remembers actual details.

3) The judge denied Trump's legal team the right to present tons of evidence establishing her mental instability living like a lunatic in the woods and saying "rape is sexy" to Anderson on CNN, and her being a clear opportunist laughing and celebrating the settlement on MSNBC with Rachel Maddow.

If this was anyone but Trump, the case would've been laughed out of court. But it is held with a biased judge who openly hates Trump in a Democratic heavy district with lawyers who have ties to Biden.

ryandeffley
Автор

Eighth Amendment: Excessive bail shall not be required, (nor excessive fines imposed, ) nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

scwps
Автор

Ridiculous cash amount designed to cause Trump personal financial hardship.

scwps
Автор

The fact this ever went to trial in the first place is egregious. Everyone with functioning eyes and brain knows WTF is going on here.
All taxpayers should be pissed off but then again, TDS tends to affect those organs first.

BuckFidenMD
Автор

The ripple effects will be an encroachment into more of the US citizens' privacy. This should have never been able to get this far up the court system.

mikepierce
Автор

Alvin Bragg and Leticia James should be proud of themselves. Certainly NYC mayor Adams is getting his. lolo NO sympathy for the dems.

dancinginabundance
Автор

The AG who ran on "I will get Trump". Bias and party should never be the basis of prosection😢

cshaf
Автор

Trump's team seems to be making a call to facts. The prosecutors seemed to be making a call to emotion. How predictable

warcotm
Автор

I think the appeals court of NY will overturn this decision - the AG lawyer is quite out of her league.

boomer
Автор

So people understand Trump had to pay for saying his property was worth a certain amount. Not for missing payments or being delinquent on the loans. Self appraisal of assets happens every day in the US. A similar instance is when you have a classic car and the insurance asks you to appraise it in order to cover it completely. You can appraise it at $10 million if you want. You just have to pay that amount. Trumps property may have some historical value as well as the basic property worth.

H-Town_
Автор

Why were two of those judges helping the NY defender make her case for her? I thought judges were supposed to be wait, this is NY, never mind

coop
Автор

Oh my lord She is doing backflips to try and justify the politicization of the judicial system. This is a disgrace to the NY judicial system 😮😮

cshaf
Автор

FORBES, TAKE OFF THAT STUPID BANNER !

Joseph-oy
Автор

This gov is so god damn-c0rrupt. It makes me physically sick…

naomivought
Автор

Trump does not stand a chance against the liberals on this court. After watching first 5 minutes I figured that out. Lets go to the Supreme Court

HAGMAN