Trianon 100. évfordulója

preview_player
Показать описание
Ma van a nemzeti összetartozás napja. A közmédia összes csatornáján, internetes felületén megemlékezünk a magyar történelem legtragikusabb napjáról. Több mint 20 zenekar és énekes fogott össze, hogy közösen előadják a Hazám, hazám című dalt. A videoklip az összetartozást szimbolizálja és megemlékezik a trianoni békediktátum 100. évfordulójára. A szövegét szinte az egész magyar nyelvterületről gyűjtött népdalokból, katonadalokból válogatták össze.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Isten áldja az egész embert, legyen békeség szeretet az egész villágon!

katikafodor
Автор

Üdv benneteket testvéreim innen Vajdasàgbol. !!

dfdf
Автор

Isten Áldja Magyarországot, a Magyar Nemzetet! 😊 ❤️

ON-qyto
Автор

Nagyon jol sikerült:zene, szöveg es a
felvetelek!!Soprontol Csiksomlyoig👏👏

mariahomey
Автор

Trianon emlékére.

Egy tollvonással

Magyarnak születtem, egy csonka országban!
Csukott szemmel éltem drága Hunniában.
Nagymamám mesélte, ki már elment régen,
mit nem tanítottak ezen a vidéken.

Kárpátok ölében volt egy csodás ország,
hegycsúcsok övezték, rónák tarkították.
Megtermett ott minden mi élethez kellhet,
ellátta önmagát ez a büszke nemzet.

Volt számos bányája, mely ellátta fémmel,
nincs pezsgő mely felért kristályos vízével!
Hőforrásaiból gyógyír ingyen áradt.
Szívesen fogadták a vándort ha fáradt.

Aztán jött a gonosz, egész világ égett,
emberek szívében Belzebub feléledt.
Hullott az ifjúság, aljas érdekektől,
mégis kitartottak végig becsületből.

Aztán vége szakadt. Nem dörgött már fegyver.
Szörnyű bosszút álltak győzők, forró fejjel!
Azt büntették jobban mely' nemzettől féltek.
Volt egy gazdag ország, amit széjjeltéptek.

Térképet rajzoltak komisz tollvonással,
népünket gyalázták számító határral.
Büszke nemzetünknek sanyarú lett sorsa.
Patakban folyt könnyünk, Duna összemosta.

Szép hazánk határa, a Mennyekből látszik.
Hiába rajzoltok a térképre bármit,
száz év távlatából, hatalmatok nincsen!
Egy haza, s a nemzet minden Magyar szívben!

Jogos örökségünk, követeljük vissza!
Minden szegletében van egy ősünk sírja.
Hol egykor száz éve Magyar zászló lengett,
ahhoz joga nincsen holmi idegennek!

2020.06.03.

(kép: MTA)

janoshecz
Автор

Igazság! Drága Anyácska, szeress minket! ÁLDÁS! ( Felvidék )

neo-yournailstylist
Автор

Nádherné😘😘😘 Maďari boli a budú vždy Géniovia (prirodzený)🍀🌲❤️🆔♾️

viktoriaritanagyova-jurcis
Автор

Some interesting excerpts from the book "A Mad Catastrophe. The Outbreak Of World War I And The Collapse Of The Habsburg Empire", by Geoffrey Wawro (Basic Books, New York, 2014):
"These Hungarians, who had arrived from Central Asia in the ninth century, were a unique racial islet, speaking a unique language, Magyar. Their existence was defined by fear: the fear of being mastered by the Germans or swallowed up by the Slavs. This gave the Hungarians a bullying spirit, a determination to “Magyarize” everyone around them in order to augment their own small numbers and nip ethnic competition in the bud. The most immediately affected were the Rumanians of Austria. Three million strong— 6 percent of the imperial population—they lived cheek by jowl with the Hungarians in the Carpathian basin and were under constant pressure to give up their language and culture and speak Magyar instead." (page 36)
"On paper, at least, the creation of Austria-Hungary from Austria contained a certain logic. The Hungarians would no longer seek to secede from the monarchy and would put their Hunnish talents to work repressing any who would. The division of the empire into a German-run “Cisleithania” and a Hungarian-run “Transleithania” (...) superficially simplified the monarchy’s nationality problems by subcontracting the eastern ones to the Hungarians so that the German Austrians could focus on the western ones in a system of “dualism.” But whereas the German Austrians had a relatively soft touch, officiousness tempered by irresolution, the Hungarians were officious, hardnosed, and resolute. After the 1867 Ausgleich or compromise, which created Austria-Hungary, they pressed ahead with a hard campaign of “Magyarization.” Their saucepan of the nations had a single flavor: paprika. Whereas the Germans viewed the “people of state” label as license merely to patronize Cisleithania’s Slavs by requiring them to interact with Habsburg officialdom in the German language, the Hungarians viewed theirs as license to abolish Transleithania’s other nationalities: Slavs and Rumanians would be “de-nationalized” by prohibitions on their churches, schools, languages, and cultures." (page 26)
"A French visitor to Austria-Hungary in 1902 observed that everything was “dualist” in the empire, including the banknotes. One side of an Austro-Hungarian crown note was Austrian, with the denomination spelled out in German as well as the eight other languages of Cisleithania: Polish, Italian, Czech, Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian, Rumanian, and Ukrainian. The flip side of the note was Hungarian, with the denomination spelled out in Magyar alone. “Astonishing, ” the French visitor commented; “for official Hungary, the nationalities here do not even exist.” Such ethnic arrogance naturally commanded nothing more than a sullen obedience. “Faced with this internal campaign of national annihilation, non-Hungarians here are reduced to silence and immobility, even though they are the majority!” the Frenchman concluded." (page 27)
"Having declared in 1867 that “the Slavs are not fit to govern; they must be ruled, ” Hungarian prime minister Gyula Andrássy and each of his successors until 1918 enforced that rule with a hard hand. By the 1880s, millions of Austro-Hungarians were emigrating to America. Those who remained looked beyond Austria-Hungary for rescue—the Slavs to Russia or Serbia, the Rumanians to Rumania." (page 27)
"The dominant Magyars stamped out every effort by the Rumanians and other subject nationalities to speak their own languages in school or public offices as “contradicting the cardinal principles of Hungarian national policy.” The more chauvinistic among the Magyars, such as Count Albert Apponyi, spoke proudly of a cultural “policy of colonization.” (page 49)

CborgMega
Автор

Vesszen Trianon!🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺 Szeretlek Magyar hazám!!

gaborbatancs
Автор

Család, haza, szeretet., ez visz előre

jutkanagy
Автор

Vesszen, vesszen Trianon!
(Az a több mint 6 ember ne mondja magára, hogy magyar)

mrvbalazs
Автор

Bryan Cartledge, *The Will to Survive. A History of Hungary*, Hurst &Company, London, 2011:

<<When the [Hungary's] delegation, led by Count Albert Apponyi and including, among others, István Bethlen and Pál Teleki, arrived on Paris on 6 January 1920, it was handed the draft treaty (...). In response, the Hungarians submitted a number of memoranda (...) of which Apponyi gave an oral summary in his address to the Supreme Council on 16 January. Making the focus of his speech the transfer to foreign rule of half the Hungarian population, including (he claimed) 3.5 million Magyars, Apponyi demanded plebiscites in the region of Hungary affected, in accordance with Wilsonian principles.(...) The Council heard Apponyi out in silence; there was no subsequent discussion. Apponyi and most of his delegation returned to Budapest two days later.(...) The conference's formal response to Hungary's representations came under cover of a letter from [Etienne] Millerand [new French prime-minister that had replaced Clemenceau] to Apponyi on 6 May 1920. Its tone was harsh, its content uncompromising. Dismissing Apponyi's references to the consecration of Hungary's frontiers by a thousand years of history, the letter brusquely stated: 'A state of affairs, even when millennial, is not meant to exist when it has been recognised as contrary to justice'.
Apponyi demand for plebiscites received equally short shrift:
'The will of the people was expresed in October and November of 1918 at the collapse of the Dual Monarchy when the populations, oppressed for so long, united with their Italian, Roumanian, Yugo-Slav and Czecho-Slovak kindred. The events occurring since that epoch constitute so many proofs the more of the sentiments of the nationalities formerly subjected to the Crown of St. Stephen. The tardy measures taken by the Hungarian Government to satisfy the need felt by the nationalities for an autonomy is not able to create any illusion; they do not change at all the essentials of historical truth: notably, that during long years all the efforts of Hungarian policy were directed to stifling the voice of the ethnical minorities.'>> (pp. 329-330)

<<In many respects the task that had faced the Peace Conference, that of giving precision to new frontiers already drawn by events, could not have been completed with justice or in ways conducive to a peaceful future for east-central Europe. The major transfers of territory, already determined by a combination of popular will and military occupation, could have been reversed or significantly modified only by the use or threat of force by the Allied Powers against successor states: this was inconceivable.
Even with regard to the aspects of Trianon most open to criticism, those that placed so many Magyars under alien rule, the conference had only limited discretion. The fate of the Magyar-speaking Székely, for example, living for centuries in the south-east corner of Transylvania adjacent to Romania, had been determined by history and geography; it was not susceptible to revision by diplomats or cartographers. The same applied to many ethnic islands of Magyars in Transylvania, Slovakia and the Bánát. Plebiscites, which Hungarians vainly requested, might have modified the outcome - particulary in Slovakia, where enthusiasm in Turoczentmárton for union with the Czechs was less marked than in Prague - but only at the margins. Too much should not be reead into the outcome of the one plebiscite that was eventually held, in Sopron and a few neighboring villages, resulting in a substantial majority against incorporation into Austria; it was possible, in that case, to draw he new frontier around the loyal districts. But a plebiscite could not have helped the Szekely in Transylvania or the Magyars in Pozsony and Kassa.(...)
Nevertheless, in acknowledging the evident injustice of an outcome in which Versailles cost Germany only 10 per cent of her territory against the 66 per cent of which Trianon formally deprived Hungary, a caveat must be entered: the major part of Hungary's losses stemmed not from the Peace Conference, nor even from the defeat of Austria-Hungary in war, but from the policies which for three-quarters of a century had made Hungarian rule unpalatable, sometimes intolerable, to the non-magyar nationalities of Hungary. Those policies helped to ensure the eventual victory of the national idea in a kingdom whose heterogeneous ethnicity had been determined by geography, migration, historical accident and, in her medieval past, over-ambitious expansion; and they must, therefore, bear much of the responsibility for the kingdom's dissolution.>> (pp. 330-331)

CborgMega
Автор

Dear Hungarians, we Poles know very well how you feel - we also survived five partitions (1772, 1793, 1795, 1815, 1939) and lost our Kresy - the Eastern Borderlands together with our beloved cities of Lwów, Wilno, Grodno … but now it's a matter of the past as borders cannot be moved again and we have to try to live peacefully with our neighbours !

mareka
Автор

These magyars do not recognize the right of some peoples to decide for themselves with whom and in what country to live. In 1918 the Romanians, Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats decided that they no longer wanted to be part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and that they could manage their own territories for thousands of years, territories that had never belonged to the Magyars or the state. Hungary, with the mention that also in November 1918 Hungary became an independent country. So in 1920 there was a reconnaissance of the borders and not as it is said by the Magyars propaganda that Hungary was punished. And for 100 years this pathetic lie of the Magyars has been spreading.

philodacus
Автор

***Okay don’t laugh at Hungary, please don’t laugh! Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Land thieves, horse eaters! Viva Trianon!

StefanGabriel-
Автор

Long live Trianon, long live justice.

Mementomori-vh
Автор

Nemzeti összetartás?Ez a nép aztán nagyon összetart.

oliverjuhasz
Автор

én vagyok az egyetlen akit hidegen hagy ez az egész trianon dolog?

en
Автор

Romania has to recover western Crișana

gelulache