How to treat a lady right

-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
📺 Watch our latest video: "Butcher explains why he gave up meat"
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-

[tweetydog]

chickens are so
cute and adorable and funny

[Amateur_Pianist_]

One issue is that this is encouraging people to buy 'cage free' eggs which is actually over crowded barns where the chickens live in their own shit. When there's a high demand for cage free eggs, it's impossible to make them all humane.

[samb]

That hen is a riot. Thank you for saving her she is truly a jem.

[oscarguzman]

"If you love something set it free" Chickens as the rest of sentient beings are not things, they are *someone*. The only act of justice towards non human animals is to go and stay vegan.  

[Vegan_Truth]

Individual nonhuman animals are sentient; they have interests in their own continued survival and freedoms, just like each individual human does. Humans are not superior to nonhuman animals in any objective, factual sense. They can only be made to seem so if glimpsed through the lens of arbitrary irrational criteria and subjective personal opinion (and self-serving opinion at that).

This means that we can't morally justify intentionally harming animals without also leaving the door open for moral justifications for harming humans. We then can't claim that we ourselves should be protected from the threat of being harmed; any criteria we use to justify denying animals the right to not be harmed can also be used to exclude our own claim to that right.

Nor should we want to deny them the same rights we have. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" is The Golden Rule for a reason. Most people know intuitively that we should not harm others for no good reason. The only questions we need to start asking ourselves are "why shouldn't animals qualify as 'others'?" and "what constitutes 'a good reason to harm'?"

Regardless of any other definitions, "others" must include "all sentient beings", and "a good reason to harm" MUST NOT include "merely for our own pleasure or other trivial selfish interests and desires." To make but 2 examples, we have no dietary need for any animal substances at all; neither do we have a real need to mount the head of a slain animal on our wall. If we have no real need to harm sentient animals, then doing so merely for a trivial interest is immoral. Their right to not be harmed naturally supersedes our interest in harming them.

The objective truth is that all nonhuman animals qualify as deserving of the right to not be intentionally exploited in any way by humans merely for our own pleasure or other trivial interests. This includes being used for "food", clothing, entertainment, or medical research subjects. Either they do deserve the right to not be used for these things, just like we do, or neither nonhumans nor humans deserve that right. We can't have it both ways.

If our species as a whole continues to believe that humans are superior to animals and that it's therefore morally justifiable to harm and otherwise exploit them merely for reasons such as species membership or rational abilities, then we will continue to believe that it's morally justifiable to harm and otherwise exploit each other for whatever arbitrary reason we deem acceptable. Which is why we already have so much racism, genderism, homophobia, ableism, tyranny, mass murder, and all the other human rights atrocities we commonly abhor.

When we stop exploiting nonhuman animals, we as a species begin to see how the exploitation of other humans in these ways can be ended. When we truly believe that these atrocities we are committing need to end, and we decide to match our actions to our beliefs in this regard, the only logical choice is to completely stop using animals for food, clothing, research or entertainment. This means Abolitionist Veganism.

This is not a question of merely being "kind" or "loving animals", it's a question of moral justice, which is the most important thing for every human to observe. In my opinion, it's the very heart of what it means to call ourselves human.

To learn more about Abolitionist Veganism, go here:

[Felontrump]

If you love something set it free????  Then kill it???  Fucking disturbingly wrong.

[mydspersonaluploads]

I sometimes like chickens because their funny sometimes. XD

[wlzdj]

i have a dozen hens that are set free.if you put them in a cage, you can see sadness in their faces and also they make depressed cluck
after all eggs of free range hens are known to be more healthy than the caged as they eat different plants and insects

[michaelsanti]

 funny video, i hope people   watch this video and adopt chickens, they are perfect PETS, are kind  , funny, friendly, smart, and they deserve to  be free,  and enjoy life like has to be,  and not be torture and massacre like  these CRIMINALS do.

[HumanbeingonfloatingEarth]

ultimately just adopt a chicken and give it a loving home ..they make amazing pets/companions
💓VEGAN🌱LIFE 🌏

[tam]

Hello vegetarians, I was once like you but then I woke up & saw just how cruel the egg & dairy industries are & that is just as cruel as the meat industry (seriously! do your research) now I've been vegan for some months & never felt happier & healthier. Well actually I'm feeling kinda sad now after watching Dominion 2018 trailor

[gerardinedeenicollard]

🇦🇺🤓NOW THAT'S an Aussie man..ahhh.🌬️❣️🧐.

[mydspersonaluploads]

Very well explained XD Better than PETA. XD

[papasensalsaverdeconarroz]

All ladies an gentleman deserves a proper life.
Nature doesn't stands just for one specie only, so why human animals will take that inmoral decision?

[Clipem_Liam]

WHAT ABOUT FISH STILL ALIVE PUT IN BOXS .HUMANS A PERFETIC.WHATS THE DIFFERENCE,

[windowdust]

Free range eggs farms are also hideous places. Easy answer - boycott eggs