What really is a function?

preview_player
Показать описание
We look at the precise definition of a function.

If you are going to use an ad-blocker, considering using brave and tipping me BAT!

Books I like:

Abstract Algebra:

Differential Forms:

Number Theory:

Analysis:

Calculus:

My Filming Equipment:

Music from Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
License code: WREG2MC4MRR7WCUG
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Two things:
1. New studio space is still under construction.
2. not every transition can be super smooth and cinematic...

MichaelPennMath
Автор

One underrated thing he did: The slides are friendly to screens of even the smallest of phones.

Edit: even in 144p

taufiqutomo
Автор

7:40 Isn't x restricted to be positive? That would mean (1, -1) \not\in h ...

caldersheagren
Автор

3:43 Now this is production value
9:43 Good Place To Stop

goodplacetostop
Автор

7:16. I'm confused. The way h is written, it can't contain (1, -1) since x can't be negative.

tomkerruish
Автор

Awesome video! Also love that you‘re experimenting with different locations and camera shots, looks great! Love your content. Greetings from Germany ^^

lucakoch
Автор

I don't think your leading definition is quite correct as displayed. I think you should say "such that (a, b) \in f" at the end. Otherwise, your statement about a and b do not actually involve the function.

EpicMathTime
Автор

hey Michael Penn, just letting you know you are amazing ❤,
Your videos really help me understand the concepts so I'd like to encourage you to make more videos on the topics of mathematics. Your videos have helped me when I didn't understand the concepts in calculus and real analysis.
Thank you so much!

akashpoudel
Автор

I would like to buy a full academic course from you. Have u considered making such courses?

Chess-kslk
Автор

Isn't h={(x^2, x) | x in [0, infty)} still a function since (1, -1) would not be in there as -1 not in [0, infty)?

oida
Автор

A definition for a function will vary with certain mathematicians even though the core meaning is the same. All you need are two sets(non-empty preferred). If W is to be a function all you need is again two non-empty subsets one called the pre-image and the other the image such that if p is in the pre-image it is "mapped" to only one element from the image. Otherwise it is called a multi-valued function.

roberttelarket
Автор

Your definition should say (a, b) is in f, not in AxB

samdean
Автор

I am really confused or I missed something in the last but one example. I see there a condition that x >= 0, therefore for me h(1)=-1 is not a counterexample. What did I miss?

gaborendredi
Автор

Love the outdoor blackboard. Do you use Hagaromo chalk?

AM-hjbo
Автор

Question: at 7:35, you took the set (1, -1) and (1, 1) however, the first one does not satisfy the condition (x^2, x), actually they would be (-1, 1) and(1, 1) respectively, which is a set since no element in the domain is assigned to 2 different elements in the co domain

shivam
Автор

Hello I think you're videos are great and very interesting.

natepolidoro
Автор

At the bottom of the first slide, I think you meant “is an element of f” not “is an element of a cross b”.

MaxG
Автор

What always doesn't quite work for me with this definition of a function, is that a function f:A -> B would be identical to a function g:A -> C, x |-> f(x), where B is a subset of C. I thought that functions with different codomains should be considered different.

CodingDragon
Автор

I don't know if the definition is ok, I think it would end with (a, b) in f

nahuelcaruso
Автор

The first one is a function, but not one whose domain is the integers like it was presumably supposed to be. We can guess what the domain ought to be from the form of the definition, but there's nothing in the set of pairs to let us know that 1 is supposed to have a value.

iabervon