APPROACHES (Section A) - Exam Paper Walk Through - June 2022 Paper 2

This video is an exam paper walk through of the June 2022 Paper 2 for AQA A-level Psychology. This is the first of three videos covering the three sections of the exam paper, with this video covering Section A: Approaches.

// Videos relating to the questions covered in the paper //

//OTHER VIDEOS TO WATCH //

PRODUCTS I USE & BOOKS I READ:

RECOMMENDED READING

WHO AM I? Hi - I’m Tom. I’m a Psychology teacher based in the North of England. I've been teaching for over a decade and have numerous years of being an A-level examiner. I started Bear it in MIND to share my own passion for Psychology, and to provide people with content to help us better understand ourselves and others.

00:00 - Intro
00:33 - Overview of Paper 2
02:19 - Question 01
05:25 - Question 02
08:40 - Question 03
10:33 - Question 04

// LINKS //
By using some of the affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This is the easiest way to support me and helps me continue making content like this for you. Thank you 👍

[jacobeccleston]

These videos giving me PTSD from that exam 😭

[Hanifa_A_YT]

Today's exam was better than I would have expected! Thank you for your immediate work on paper 2 to provide us guidance!

[OnlyAyeshaA]

Can you make videos on schizophrenia, relationships and addiction before paper 3 exams on 3rd June thank you

[caolancc]

I have a mock exam tomorrow and this helped thanks :)

[imran-vrej]

can you please upload paper 3 revision videos for schizophrenia, relationships and aggression 🙏

[BS-jvmc]

THANK YOU SO MUCH ! These walkthroughs are so helpful and so well explained, would you be able to do forensic psychology in paper 3 please?

[jammydodger]

Hey thanks for the brilliant video!

Is it a valid eval to say that conditions of worth are unfalsifiable e.g. you cannot prove that conditions of worth are not the cause of an individuals behaviour?

I feel like that might be a convoluted point to explain, so maybe it is better to argue that conditions of worth are not directly observable?

Let me know what you think please

[jammydodger]

Hey Sir, for q3 you talk in the answer as if it is guaranteed the students will become more active, how are you meant to know this from the STEM as it says "whether or not students..." "could depend on mediational processes" "explain how mediational processes might be involved..." I interpreted this as they might become more active or might not and talked in my answer that way e.g. i said it depends on the students motivation, attention, retention, reproduction etc.