Canon R6 III LEAKED! Canon R5 II Dynamic Range FAIL!

0:00 Dramatic glasses removal
0:25 Squarespace Promo
1:03 First camera with security
2:34 Which Camera won the Olympics?
3:00 Flashpoint 600 Pro II released
3:27 Kodak Sold... Again
4:03 Camera Sales Rankings
4:32 Sony Smartphone Sensor, 2X Dynamic Range
5:25 Canon R5 II Dynamic Range problem
6:36 Canon LEAKED lenses
7:56 Canon R6 III LEAKED specs
9:34 Summary
9:49 Squarespace Promo

[vowb]

Leaking camera’s, that is why I always buy a water resistant camera.

[CountDiLuna]

If anyone's wondering, I just googled and it's Kodak Alaris (UK) that has been sold, not Eastman Kodak (US, the film manufacturer).

[mkx]

It's not such a tragedy, the R52 it is still far better than the 5Ds R. Also, pushing the shadows too high up, the magenta fog is no longer there like on the R5.
That said, I would love to see a Canon high-res body aimed at the landscape/architecture/studio photographer. A R5s in other words.

[amermeleitor]

Seems like Nikon it's gaining some pro sport photography market.

[dris]

The R5 II images have more noise, but also seem to have more detail.

[cynvs]

Stacked sensors have always been a compromise, the Z7 also is better in that regard than the flagship Z9. But really, if you're mainly doing landscapes, you probably don't need the new R5 II or a Z9, and if you need those cameras for wildlife, sports or whatever, you can still get around it by bracketing.
In my opinion, and for my use case (Wildlife), the trade-off is more than worth it. For landscapes, you can pick up a full frame, 45 MP Z7 used for like 1200€ nowadays, probably similar in USD, which is an amazing deal.

[wojciechbalsewicz]

If someone needs to lift the shadows by 6 stops in pp, then there was something wrong with the camera settings.

[tonyy]

We need security features on all cameras.

[pgzhtkw]

The R5 dynamic range is fine, Go to photons to photos for scientific testing where you can compare R5 Mk2 to any other camera.

[MattMakes]

I bought the Canon R6ii just after launch, and don't plan on upgrading to the mk iii. I do mainly landscape and wildlife photography, so the increased video specs don't much matter to me - and it seems like that could probably be pushed through on a firmware update anyway.
Keep up the great updates! :)

[alanm.]

For me the R6III is a no go. If I were to buy a full frame camera, I want it to have at least 45MP.
However, the possibility of a new R6-series camera this year would mean they are updating every two years. And if that's the case, maybe Canon will surprise us by fixing the APS-C R7.
Despite the name, the R7 falls well short of the "pro" quality APS-C Canon was so successful with in the 7D and 7DII DSLRs. They tried to carry on with the 90D, telling us that combined the best of the 80D and 7DII... but that fell short. The R7 is more of a mirrorlesst 90D than 7DII.
As much success as they had with the 7D-series, it is baffling why Canon didn't go more upscale with the R7. Hopefully they will correct that in its successor. The R7II should have...
- Faster readout speed to reduce rolling shutter effect.
- Better AF (they proved it's possible, with the full frame cameras).
- Larger buffer.
- Dual card slots with at least one CFExpress (preferably both).
- Compatibility with a battery grip.
- More "normal" Canon ergonomics... especially put the main dial back where it belongs.
Yes, these things would mean the R7II costs more than the R7. But so did the 7DII... ten years ago! Its intro price was $400 more (US) than the R7's.
What are you afraid of, Canon? That a truly pro-grade APS-C camera will steal sales from your full frame line up? If you don't build it, someone else will. (Have you noticed Fuji's increased market share?) Or are you waiting for Sony or Nikon (as you did the last time... with the D200, D300 & D500)?

[AlexLancashirePersonalView]

I wish that they would up the sensor on the M6mk3 to 30 mp like the R. I recently bought a second hand R to use as a backup and find the pics better than the R6 mk2 I have. R is a bit clunky to use but I think that I like it better Tony.

[StevenSiew]

"If the 24MP sensor on the Canon R6 mkIII is bsi and or stacked, improving dynamic range an low light performance, I would consider upgrading from the original R6. Better AF is always a welcome addition too."
I too really need the new Backside Illumination technology in the new Canon R6 Mark III because I mainly shoot female backsides.

[d_dave]

Wow. I didn't care even slightly about all the previous complaints regarding the R5 II or especially the R1. But THIS matters. Dynamic range is very important to me. If this turns out to be accurate and not some kind of mistake, I'll be sticking with the R5.

[harryronics]

Canon should include a cooling fan system in the r6 mark 3, to avoid overheating problems.

[khalemaru]

i think the R6 III is more a major frimware update for the R6 II and don't think it's an another camera

[TheXone]

I knew it...I knew it Canon will mess up in R5 II in terms of low light performance.

[drummerg]

It’s hard to tell on YouTube, but it looks like the r5II images are sharper than the r5’s. While the r5 images have less noise, it almost looks like some noise reduction was applied?

[Perceptes]

Built-in GPS is a hard requirement for me, so I still have nothing to replace my Canon 6D II. I get GPS tagging on photos from a literal telephone that fits in my pocket—it's an absolute embarrassment that cameras three or four times the price can't do the same.

[Matt]

I wonder how quick this camera will end up on Canon's "apology page". Not falling for the BS long lens patents.
200-800 still not available and no ETA on shipping 1 year after release.