Gravitational Lensing: New Theory Challenges Spacetime Curvature

Today I would like to discuss gravitational lensing and starlight bending effects. We know that when light from a distant object, such as a galaxy, passes near a massive object like a galaxy cluster, its path is bent. This bending causes the light source to appear distorted, magnified, or multiplied, depending on the alignment and relative distance between the lensing object and the background source. This phenomenon acts as a natural cosmic lens, enabling us to study distant galaxies in the universe.

There are three main types of gravitational lensing:

Strong lensing, where the lensing effect is so powerful that it produces multiple images of the same distant object.
Weak lensing, where the lensing effect is weaker, causing only small distortions in the images of distant objects.
Microlensing, where the lensing effect is caused by a single, isolated object like a star, rather than a galaxy or cluster of galaxies.
In a previous section, we discussed how aether fills space as a result of the conversion of mass defects into aether, which occurs throughout the universe. Aether is another state of matter, and while each individual unit has mass, we do not currently know how to measure it.

Gravity attracts aether particles to every massive body, creating a dense region of aether around it. This region forms a bubble that encloses the body. Every massive body has a surrounding bubble. For example, the Moon, Earth, Sun, and galactic center each have their own bubble. The Moon's bubble is located within Earth's bubble, Earth's bubble is situated within the Sun's bubble, and the Sun's bubble is positioned within the vast bubble of the galactic center. This means that smaller mass bubbles are encompassed by larger mass bubbles.

Since a body and its surrounding bubble move together, there is no "aether wind" to detect. As a result, experiments like Michelson-Morley's would not work. The density of aether is higher near a massive body and decreases with distance, suggesting the creation of an aether density gradient around the body. This gradient affects a region's refractive property, as high aether density corresponds to a high refractive index and vice versa. Consequently, light travels more slowly in regions of high aether density near massive bodies. This offers a fresh perspective on gravitational lensing, as the bending and refraction of light in regions with differing refractive indices lead to phenomena such as starlight bending and gravitational lensing.

This significantly impacts our current understanding of the universe. If a ray of light travels from one edge of a galaxy to another, its speed will change multiple times. This implies that the speed of light is not a universal constant, as currently believed, but instead varies with the local aether density. This completely invalidates Einstein's gravitational curvature of space and time. Based on my studies, gravity is simply an attractive force. In the coming video, we will discuss how gravity and speed impact the flow of time.
Joseph George
This work is supported by
Daniel Michael Macdonald
#josephgeorgephysics
Credit: ESA/Hubble

[engineerahmed]

I arrived at identical conclusions. Local Aether with boundary layer theory satisfies all experimental evidence incl Nickelson Morley. Eg pilot in front seat of Mach 2 F-14 can hear rear pilot, because the local air travelling at Mach 2.

Local Aether Phenomena can be accurately modelled using sound wave analogy experiments eg. Sound of a fly buzzing & flying at v1*100kph in a model bus; & model bus moving with moving v2=200kph inside an actual bus, & actual bus moving with v3=300kph inside Boeing 747: & inside Boeing747 travelling at v4=600kph. All have windows open. All observers in respective places will hear eachother & no earth observer will hear fly & model bus sonic boom, model bus & fly both being supersonic wrt earth. Only because of local fluid & local fluid boundary layer within global fluid phenomena. ...If same theory applied to light all experimental observation can be satisfied without invoking Einstein relativity (a makeshift theory).