Plastic pollution: is it really that bad?

preview_player
Показать описание
Nine in ten Europeans worry about plastic’s impact on the environment. But plastic is not the worst offender when compared to other kinds of pollution
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"Virtually all of it is collected in developed countries"

I think you guys forgot to mention that most of it is also shipped to developing countries for disposal. Easy to hold the moral high ground while producing a ton of waste and putting the burden of disposing it on others and then blaming them for "waste production"

cosmiclyrics
Автор

I hope we all take plastic or any kind of waste disposal segregation seriously. We only have one planet, we need to take care of it.

ICoreAcademyPH
Автор

The problem with this video, and our views on plastic waste in general, is that we don't see these problems as interconnected - what about the emissions from producing the plastic? Why is large amounts in south East Asia? How much of our recycling is actually recycled?

SweetAsAStrawberry
Автор

Every change starts as a drop in the ocean. And every drop counts.

ValdemarDeMatos
Автор

There are lots of plastic sorting centres in the UK, but not a single recycling plant. All plastic in the UK was shipped to Indonesia & China, but unfortunately much of it contained food residue so by the time it reached Asia, it was toxic waste & not fit to be recycled. Which is why China & Indonesia used to dump so much plastic, but have now banned it's import. Most of the world used to send their plastic to Asia to be recycled. Now that Britain cannot, 66% of sorted & recyclable plastic is being buried in landfill and that figure will get higher until we build facilities that can turn the used plastic into reusable pellets. It is in accurate research to blame Asia for the problem. The problem is developed countries send their recycling overseas to be processed, rather than mandate that they must be recycled in their home nations for reuse.

ethelthecat
Автор

blaming southeast asian countries off-hand appears to be misleading. what about the issue of waste trade and how developed countries (the ones who produce much of the waste) simply dump their garbage on these developing countries. the latter countries, who may not have the technology to recycle these garbage, may have no choice but to dump them in the ocean instead

joanbatara
Автор

I’m 40 days into my new life of “no plastic” it’s been very challenging but it is getting easier! Last night I made my own toothpaste all ingredients found in paper or glass (sadly once we stop using plastic, paper and glass production will go up or hopefully biodegradable plastics (that actually break down!!!) will be used. Hopefully we will create a balance. I challenge anyone reading this to check out the plastic challenge and research “zero waste” sure it might not be 100% perfect but it’s damn near 85% to 90% better than turning the other cheek and continuing to use single use plastic. are we doinggg! We must change NOW. Much love everyone, we got this.

goingtobeok
Автор

Plastic pollution is very serious in various countries. Although it brings a lot of convenience to our lives, plastic waste is difficult to degrade and will continue to exist in the environment for hundreds of years. So I hope more people can use recyclable materials and jointly protect our environment

woocheongan
Автор

It's ridiculous to imply that the world must focus on South East Asia to solve plastic pollution, because the world treats South East Asia as it's plastic dumping ground. We recycle our plastics all the while knowing that most of it will not be recycled and will be shipped off to South East Asia to be dumped. The statement at the end of this video is nothing more than an attempt to shift the blame and is not productive. We need alternatives to plastics and a clean method to dispose and recycle existing plastics.

bashirattah
Автор

According to my knowlege, Most unentional waste is caused by Wind pulling the objects in, or consumer while walking with an opened-source. Most examples are:
A. Consumer Bought an Burger with bag and went to eat it outside, when the consumer removed the burger from the bag it Flew due to Wind to the Street and the consumer could not have picked it.
B. Induvidal riding an bicycle, From the Pocket an Used-bag of Ciggarates flew, while the Induvidal did not notice it.
C. An Opened source container (Container where the top is opened fully), an plastic bag due to wind flew out of it.

There are few soluctions to this problem that would be possible to adapt. Making the bags/bottles heavier, Making containers closed-top, stopping the wind (Not really possible 😅). The objective of these solutions are to reduce and prevent the bags from being distrubited, These solutions will not try to solve on how to manage or deal with the waste which May not be practical, The First Solution has problems which are; Commerically Practicality for the consumer and for the manufacturer, What materials to replace with to create higher mase?

Project_betayu
Автор

yes we understand what plastic pollution is - the question in the title is "is it really that bad"? this video is useless - can't even answer its own question - clickbait extreme

michaelxz
Автор

IF YA'LL DIDN'T GET WHAT THE VIDEO SAID I'LL SAY IT ONE MORE TIME SO THIS TIME IT GOES THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS!!! STOP WORRYING ABOUT PLASTIC IT'S NOT THAT DEEP!!!

sfridisow
Автор

Plastic waste is difficult to degrade under natural conditions, causing serious pollution and damage to the ecological environment. Therefore, I think it is very important to reduce the use of plastic products and recycle plastic waste in life. The government should also adopt relevant policies at night, and protecting the environment is the goal of global efforts.

woocheongan
Автор

I gotta admit that I'm really surprised to not see India in the list of top 5.

ajeetalbert
Автор

If anyone here is worried (not a self-promo btw), add Ocean hero to your browser as every 5 searches you make a plastic bottle is removed from the ocean, this happens because every search you make on any browser, the company is paid if you are still unsure you can watch a video on it as this is practically useless you must know what it is if you searched it in the first place. *Ik it sounds like a self-promo btw*

snowflake
Автор

Governments should pressure companies to cut plastic production for their packaging.
These companies are lining $$$ their pockets without any responsibility for the mess left behind.

Gleeaongs
Автор

We need to recognize the seriousness of plastic.

lzhvpeg
Автор

The question of whether plastic should be banned is a multifaceted and contentious issue that involves environmental, economic, and societal considerations. Plastic, with its versatile applications and convenience, has become an integral part of our daily lives. However, the environmental repercussions, particularly in terms of pollution and ecological harm, have led to fervent debates about the necessity of a plastic ban. In this essay, we will explore the arguments for and against banning plastic, examining the environmental impact, economic implications, and potential alternatives.

**Environmental Impact of Plastic:**

One of the primary arguments in favor of banning plastic revolves around its detrimental impact on the environment. Plastic pollution has reached alarming levels, with vast amounts of plastic waste accumulating in oceans, rivers, and landfills worldwide. The non-biodegradable nature of most plastics means that they persist in the environment for hundreds, if not thousands, of years, causing harm to marine life, wildlife, and ecosystems.

Plastic waste poses a severe threat to marine life, as evidenced by the Great Pacific Garbage Patch—an immense collection of floating plastic debris in the Pacific Ocean. Marine animals often mistake plastic for food, leading to ingestion and entanglement, with devastating consequences for their health and survival. Additionally, the fragmentation of plastic into microplastics further exacerbates environmental concerns, as these particles can infiltrate the food chain and have unknown consequences for human health.

Proponents of a plastic ban argue that by eliminating or significantly reducing plastic production and consumption, we can mitigate these environmental threats and work towards a more sustainable future. This viewpoint aligns with the growing awareness of the urgent need to address climate change and preserve biodiversity.

**Economic Implications:**

Conversely, opponents of a plastic ban emphasize the economic implications associated with the plastic industry. Plastic manufacturing is a significant global industry that provides employment for millions of people and contributes significantly to national economies. Banning plastic outright could lead to job losses, economic downturns in regions heavily dependent on the industry, and disruptions in global trade.

Moreover, plastic has become an integral part of various sectors, including packaging, healthcare, and technology. Prohibiting its use without viable alternatives in place could disrupt essential supply chains, impacting the availability and affordability of products ranging from medical equipment to everyday consumer goods.

To address these concerns, some argue for a gradual transition towards more sustainable alternatives rather than an immediate ban. This approach acknowledges the economic dependencies on the plastic industry while promoting a shift towards environmentally friendly practices.

**Alternatives and Innovation:**

A middle ground in the debate involves exploring alternatives to traditional plastics and encouraging innovation in materials science. Researchers and industries are actively working on developing biodegradable plastics, bio-based polymers, and other eco-friendly materials that can serve as substitutes for conventional plastics. These alternatives aim to retain the practical benefits of plastic while minimizing the environmental impact.

Advocates for this approach argue that investing in research and development of sustainable materials can lead to a more effective and pragmatic solution than an outright ban. By fostering innovation, we can create a transition to materials that maintain functionality and convenience without causing long-term harm to the planet.

**Behavioral Change and Recycling:**

Critics of a plastic ban often highlight the importance of addressing human behavior and improving recycling infrastructure instead of completely prohibiting plastic. They argue that a shift in consumer habits, coupled with enhanced recycling capabilities, could substantially reduce the environmental impact of plastic.

Efforts to promote responsible plastic use, increase recycling rates, and develop more efficient waste management systems are seen as viable alternatives to an outright ban. Education campaigns and regulatory measures that encourage proper disposal and recycling could contribute to a more sustainable coexistence with plastic.

**Conclusion: Weighing the Pros and Cons:**

In conclusion, the question of whether plastic should be banned requires a nuanced consideration of its environmental impact, economic ramifications, and potential alternatives. The environmental consequences of plastic pollution are undeniable, prompting a call for decisive action to protect our planet. However, the economic significance of the plastic industry and the need for practical alternatives present formidable challenges to an outright ban.

A comprehensive solution may lie in a balanced approach that combines regulatory measures, innovation in materials science, and a concerted effort to change consumer behavior. Governments, industries, and individuals all play crucial roles in addressing the plastic dilemma. By fostering collaboration and embracing a holistic perspective, we can work towards a future where convenience and sustainability coexist, ensuring the well-being of both humanity and the planet.

LiamEditz
Автор

Consumers didn't ask for everything to be swathed in plastic; that was imposed on us. Suddenly, paper bags were "bad" because trees, and glass bottles were "dangerous" because fragile plastic was SO much better (so much cheaper for manufacturers). Now consumers are being shamed for using the plastic that we didn't ask for and that we can't avoid. Even sewing machines are made of plastic instead of metal. Did we want that? No, the manufacturers did. Sure, they break more easily, but that's OK because you'll go buy new ones.

__Tazzzo
Автор

The video is very biased, rich world centered. The developed countries collected the plastic and send to Asia for dumping. Just do a bit of research and see where plastic collected in the US has been sent to. We need to ask who produce, promote and consume the most. The amount of plastic consumed per capita in the US and developed countries far exceeds that in developing countries. Once it is produced and used, it will not disappear from the face of our planet earth for hundreds of years. It will end up somewhere, Asia or the Ocean. We must stop producing and using single plastic, and be mindful of our consumption behaviors. Economist, get the story right, and talk about the whole system. Don't just blame the downstream countries. Look at the rich and upstream sources. We must stop plastic pollution--all have to make their effort.

sulanchen