Ζαχάροβα προς δυτικά ΜΜΕ: Πείτε μου τις ημερομηνίες των εισβολών να κανονίσω την άδεια μου | OPEN TV

Οι δυτικοί παραμένουν δύσπιστοι. Δεν έχουν βεβαιωθεί λένε ότι οι Ρώσοι πράγματι αποσύρουν τα στρατεύματα και η Μόσχα τους ειρωνεύεται.

OPEN TV:

[pavlospavleas]

Ζαχαροβά μου, !
Τι γυναικάρα είσαι σύ
Ναχεις υπόψιν σου ότι εγώ είμαι μόνιμα αδειουχος

[ioannispapastergios]

Η Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση ανημπορη σε όλο το μεγαλείο περιμενουμε και εμείς νά μας υποστηρίξει σχετικά με την Τουρκία

[B.podilatis]

Καλως μας ειρωνεονται
ΑΦΟΥ ο ιδιος ο πρόεδρος των ΗΠΑ, δηλωσε ΕΠΙΣΗΜΑΑΑΑ ημέρα εισβολής,
ευτυχως οχι ωρα εισβολης χαχαχαχαχαχχχχ

[captaingreek]

Κανονισε την αδεια σου Μαρακι, να κανονισω και εγω τη δικη μου...

[georgeperikleous]

Εμένα Ζαχαροβα κουκλάρα μου είμαι μονίμως σε άδεια όποτε θελεις εσυ

[tonyheper]

Would you consider that Russia has reconsidered its plans because it has realised that the invasion of Ukraine will cause unacceptable losses to Russia’s military?

[tonyheper]

I think it is important to put this crisis into proper perspective. The United States was interacting in a bi-polar relationship with the Soviet Union until 1989, within a framework established by the Bretton Woods principles. From 1990 to about 2017, the United States acted in an unilateral position of a single world power aiming to promote liberal principles. In EU the United States promoted liberal democracies, security and peace by encouraging the expansion of EU and NATO. Since 2017 there is a multi-polar establishment with the United States, China and Russia as participants. The foreign policy of the United States after 2017 has been considering China as a primary opponent and Russia as a distant secondary and far weaker opponent. The United States is focusing as its opponents primarily the CP of China, Iran and as a far distant opponent stands the Russian Federation. The present day policy of the United States has been to challenge Russia’s assertions and make Russia face the reality of extended war, knowing that Russia’s finances and manpower needs cannot withstand a long or protracted war. By any factual point of view, Russia is in decline. Russia faces a demographic problem that is beyond recovery. Russia is a single product economy that can come to a halt if US oil production returns to Trump era levels. As for Russian gas…..just look at a space photo of Mid Western US. You will notice an area around oilfields glowing bright with gas fires…..the United States has so much excess natural gas byproduct in its oil fields that it is burning it. Imagine if Biden’s plan to ship this natural gas to EU became reality. if Russia lost EU natural gas customers, then European Russia will become poorer than its Siberian poverty stricken villages. Perhaps, the Russian leadership should have expanded the hundreds of millions of Rubles spent in war games to threaten Ukraine in a more productive manner to develop Siberia…now, that initiative and investment would be impressive and make Russia look better……On another point, did it make sense to remove pro Russian votes from the Ukrainian Parliament by Annexing Crimea and Separating Pro Russian East Ukraine? Would it have made sense to have left pro Russian Ukrainians to vote in Ukraine’s elections? Maybe Russia could have accomplished pro Russian policy shift and as a good neighbor succeed in what it has failed to accomplish as a threatening neighbor…..But who ever said dictators act logically.