filmov
tv
James Tour Responds to Plagiarism by Dr Andrew Barron + Debunking Incorrect Claims from YouTubers

Показать описание
See the point-by-point refutation of Kevin Ausman's accusations:
"The amount of energy needed to refute [false information] is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it." - Brandolini's law
Dr. James Tour of Rice University has been accused of plagiarism by his long-time colleague and friend, Professor Andrew Barron of Swansea University. The origins of this claim are as unexpected as they are modern: a YouTube video. The saga began when Professor Barron alleged that Dr. Tour had plagiarized content, a claim that reached the ears of Rice University via an undergraduate student. What ensued was a thorough investigation by the institution, highlighting the seriousness with which such accusations are treated.
In this video Dr. Tour categorically dismantles and refutes the allegations. addressing and debunking specific accusations that ranged from the absurd—such as hijacking a funeral for religious purposes and refusing to pay graduate students beyond their third year—to the more technical, involving exaggerated claims about MRI research and a serious accusation of plagiarism.
References & Links:
AI Voice Recreation Sources:
•"James Tour Gets EXPOSED by His Own Colleagues" - YouTube
Contains transcription to "Youtube Guy" and clips from the author
• Email exchange between Dr. Andrew Barron and Dr. James Tour
• Email exchange between Vice Provost for Academic Affairs at Rice University and Dr. James Tour
List of accusations:
• Plagiarism: Accusation that James Tour plagiarized a manuscript.
• Hijacking a Funeral: Allegation that Tour hijacked a colleague's funeral.
• Graduate Student Payments: Claim that Tour refused to pay graduate students beyond their third year.
• MRI Claims: Assertion that Tour made wild and bold claims about solving problems in MRI imaging.
• Hype in Research: Accusation that Tour often made exaggerated claims about his scientific discoveries and their significance.
• False Accusations of Origin of Life Researchers: Claim that Tour made unfounded accusations against origin of life researchers regarding their work.
• Misrepresentation of Research Contributions: Assertion that Tour made misleading claims about his contributions to fields such as flash Joule heating, nanotubes, and other materials science areas.
• Misleading Impact Factors: Claim that Tour misrepresented the impact factors of journals to inflate the significance of his publications.
God bless.
~
00:00:00 The Main Characters
00:00:28 Accusations of Plagiarism
00:01:39 Andrew Still My Friend
00:02:51 It's because of OOL Criticism
00:03:51 The Accusations
00:05:31 Hijacking a Funeral
00:06:50 Refusing to Pay Grad Students
00:09:00 'MRI Imaging'?
00:09:28 Only Posting 1 or 2 Papers
00:12:43 Consider Donating!
00:13:04 Nanotubes for Cancer Research
00:14:51 Oil and Gas Research
00:15:38 The Claim of Plagiarism
00:20:00 Nothing New
00:20:32 The Timeline of Events
00:20:43 Andy Barron approved the work
00:21:08 Dr. Tour sounds the alarm
00:21:35 The MRS meeting
00:23:25 Retracting the Paper
00:23:58 Dr. Tour posts and update
00:25:37 Correspondence with Nature
00:26:25 Integrity and Transparency
00:28:59 Do you believe in the resurrection of Jesus?
00:29:20 Buddies
00:29:45 YouTuber gets impact factor wrong
00:30:39 YouTuber claims flash graphene is 'garbage'
00:31:32 YouTuber: They didn't produce graphene
00:32:11 YouTuber: Resorting to quoting reddit comments
00:32:38 Graphite vs Graphene on a Raman spectrum
00:33:46 YouTuber: Graphene is ONLY a single layer
00:35:20 YouTuber: It's on the internet so it must be true
00:36:01 Where's the mass production of graphene?
00:36:55 Retraction and revised mechanism
00:37:21 Rice University found no evidence of plagiarism
00:39:00 Andrew Barron retires from research
00:39:52 Summary
00:45:05 No answers to OOL questions
00:50:10 Scriptures
"The amount of energy needed to refute [false information] is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it." - Brandolini's law
Dr. James Tour of Rice University has been accused of plagiarism by his long-time colleague and friend, Professor Andrew Barron of Swansea University. The origins of this claim are as unexpected as they are modern: a YouTube video. The saga began when Professor Barron alleged that Dr. Tour had plagiarized content, a claim that reached the ears of Rice University via an undergraduate student. What ensued was a thorough investigation by the institution, highlighting the seriousness with which such accusations are treated.
In this video Dr. Tour categorically dismantles and refutes the allegations. addressing and debunking specific accusations that ranged from the absurd—such as hijacking a funeral for religious purposes and refusing to pay graduate students beyond their third year—to the more technical, involving exaggerated claims about MRI research and a serious accusation of plagiarism.
References & Links:
AI Voice Recreation Sources:
•"James Tour Gets EXPOSED by His Own Colleagues" - YouTube
Contains transcription to "Youtube Guy" and clips from the author
• Email exchange between Dr. Andrew Barron and Dr. James Tour
• Email exchange between Vice Provost for Academic Affairs at Rice University and Dr. James Tour
List of accusations:
• Plagiarism: Accusation that James Tour plagiarized a manuscript.
• Hijacking a Funeral: Allegation that Tour hijacked a colleague's funeral.
• Graduate Student Payments: Claim that Tour refused to pay graduate students beyond their third year.
• MRI Claims: Assertion that Tour made wild and bold claims about solving problems in MRI imaging.
• Hype in Research: Accusation that Tour often made exaggerated claims about his scientific discoveries and their significance.
• False Accusations of Origin of Life Researchers: Claim that Tour made unfounded accusations against origin of life researchers regarding their work.
• Misrepresentation of Research Contributions: Assertion that Tour made misleading claims about his contributions to fields such as flash Joule heating, nanotubes, and other materials science areas.
• Misleading Impact Factors: Claim that Tour misrepresented the impact factors of journals to inflate the significance of his publications.
God bless.
~
00:00:00 The Main Characters
00:00:28 Accusations of Plagiarism
00:01:39 Andrew Still My Friend
00:02:51 It's because of OOL Criticism
00:03:51 The Accusations
00:05:31 Hijacking a Funeral
00:06:50 Refusing to Pay Grad Students
00:09:00 'MRI Imaging'?
00:09:28 Only Posting 1 or 2 Papers
00:12:43 Consider Donating!
00:13:04 Nanotubes for Cancer Research
00:14:51 Oil and Gas Research
00:15:38 The Claim of Plagiarism
00:20:00 Nothing New
00:20:32 The Timeline of Events
00:20:43 Andy Barron approved the work
00:21:08 Dr. Tour sounds the alarm
00:21:35 The MRS meeting
00:23:25 Retracting the Paper
00:23:58 Dr. Tour posts and update
00:25:37 Correspondence with Nature
00:26:25 Integrity and Transparency
00:28:59 Do you believe in the resurrection of Jesus?
00:29:20 Buddies
00:29:45 YouTuber gets impact factor wrong
00:30:39 YouTuber claims flash graphene is 'garbage'
00:31:32 YouTuber: They didn't produce graphene
00:32:11 YouTuber: Resorting to quoting reddit comments
00:32:38 Graphite vs Graphene on a Raman spectrum
00:33:46 YouTuber: Graphene is ONLY a single layer
00:35:20 YouTuber: It's on the internet so it must be true
00:36:01 Where's the mass production of graphene?
00:36:55 Retraction and revised mechanism
00:37:21 Rice University found no evidence of plagiarism
00:39:00 Andrew Barron retires from research
00:39:52 Summary
00:45:05 No answers to OOL questions
00:50:10 Scriptures
Комментарии