The Future of Food - By Brewing??

Everyone loves ice cream and cheese, but everything that's needed, cows and all, leave some people feeling guilty. We brew beer using yeast, so what if we could brew food? What if we could grow way more food, with less land and water? What are the unintended consequences? Let's talk about Precision Fermentation, and why it's about to disrupt the entire food industry as we know it! The Biggest Disruption in History That No One is Talking About!

》》》SUPPORT THE SHOW!《《《

》》》GOING SOLAR?《《《

》》》COMPANY OUTREACH 《《《

》》》CONNECT WITH US 《《《

Chapters
0:00 - Introduction
0:50 - Food Shortages
2:05 - "Cellular Farming"
2:55 - Precision Fermentation
5:00 - How it works
5:48 - GMO?
6:33 - Companies Involved
8:55 - Insulin Production!
10:00 - Benefits
12:11 - Challenges
14:11 - Costs
15:45 - Impact on Dairy Farmers

what we'll cover
two bit da vinci,precision fermentation,precision fermentation milk,precision fermentation food,brewing milk,replacing cows for milk,creating meat without animals,impossible burger,fake meat,brewing milk with yeast,the future of food,how precision fermentation is the future of food,Brewing REAL Milk,future of food,solving the food crisis,precision fermentation process,beyond meat,food technology,beyond burger,lab grown meat,cultured meat,future food, feed the world, Breakthrough Tech Will Feed the World - 95% Less Water & Land!, Your Next Meal Might be BREWED - The Future of Food?

#PrecisionFermentation #beyondmeat #futureoffood #food #cowlessmilk #syntheticmilk #labmilk #feedtheworld #newmilk #wegotmilk #wegotlies #newfood #fermentation #nasdaily #gotmilk #milkwithoutcows #nastopics

[geoffsutton]

The reason so many people are starving is not the shortage of available foods but rather the distribution of such. All over the world there are third world governments with acres of wheat and other food products going to waste because it is not being given to those who need it.

[marklewus]

Ricky, I know you need sponsors to survive, but you should drop this one. Fine art is not an appropriate investment for the bulk of your audience, most of whom do not have the experience to evaluate the risk of art investments. I am an accredited investor, and my advice for your audience is to avoid anything with a fake “waiting list”. If you go ahead anyway, read their prospectus/terms of service carefully and be prepared to lose $$.

[PCinefro]

My concern for this is if there is a major war or event that knocks out the power grid, this food production grinds to a halt. Whereas cows will still produce milk, have babies and provide meat without power. And we can do it locally. This new method leaves everyone dependent which is fine when all is good. But when it goes bad…

[samuxan]

This might be a nightmare for Food security. On my book the main issue with GMOs is that all power over production is handed down to the few companies providing the seeds. With this it will be similar but 10 times worst, all calories for whole countries will depend on just a single company doing business on one location, probably outside of the control of their government

[bluebird]

My family has been farming for over 500 years. I'm the first generation off the farm. My family that is still in farming is having a hard time making it. It's not only pressure from corporate farms, but also climate change threatens even their ability to access water for drinking and household uses, let alone irrigation and water for livestock. I'm all for this.

[jkbrows]

I have a cattle farm with 500 head, and I honestly hope this doesn’t take over the market. I see my cattle how most people see their dogs or cats, they are my pets, and I don’t know what I would do if I had to sell them off. I can tell you a backstory of every individual one from memory cause I care about them so much. Venting sorry

[tom]

111 acres per person per year to support a meager diet? Do you not realize how utterly absurd that statement is? Not even remotely close to reality!

[b_uppy]

When food gets 'cheap' via 'tech solutions, ' it means we are paying thru the nose elsewhere. This is just another way for corporate conglomerates to profit --bigly.
This is just to tie up food markets for the conglomerate and funnel more wealth to the 0.001%.

Look into Mark Shepard and restoration ag. It's different from most practices labeled 'regenerative ag' or 'organic' as it is deeply holistic and positive in approach. It is vastly different from misnomered 'sustainable' ag.
It allows those interested in farming or wanting to stay in farming a cheaper way that is profitable, ethical, maneageable, and highly productive.
It uses rapid, natural soil building practices, builds farmer resilience. It can be done on a larger scale than most permaculture practices which means more land can be converted to better practices.
*This means avoiding:*
• chemical inputs that destroy soil, and lessen food nutrition. Replacing it with healthy soil biomes and livestock to manage disease, weeds, fertility and pests, as well as many crop residues (crop residues are what is leftover after harvest).
• heavy irrigation dependency.
Annuals are relatively heavy water users during their entire life cycle (restorative ag uses mostly food producing perennials, trees, vines and shubs which require much less irrigation support after the third year). It uses rainwater harvesting techniques like keylining, swales, check dams bunds, etc. This allows bypassing pumping water most of the time. It has the side benefit of allowing aquifers and water tables to recharge.
• avoiding monocropping of annuals and instead use interplanted, diverse species of trees, perennials, shrubs etc. Interplanted crops grown this way work symbiotically to increase fertility, preserve water, move nutrients to where they are needed, improve soil quality, etc.
• avoiding bare ground/fallow practices. Bare ground dries faster, loses the ability to retain water, or soak it in; is prone to wind and rain erosion. It contributes to increasing CO² in the air;
• instead of growing plants that need fussyness after planting,
using biome-appropriate plants. Biome-appropriate plants are better adapted to soil and rain conditions and avoid the need for heavy supplementation, etc. If it fails to do well, replace it, it's likely the wrong variety for the soil.

Most of the area West of the Mississippi has ongoing water supply problems. The Oglala Aquifer is below 20%, it has been a source of water for a large area in the Midwest.
Another person to follow is Brad Lancaster. He is an expert on rainwater harvesting and has excellent guidelines. This can be done everywhere.
It will mitigate flooding, drought, wildfires, ground subsidence, heatwaves, assist wildlife, etc.
Suggest you checkout their books, websites and YT videos for great info, proof of concept, instruction, etc.


A conglomerate can sell fertilizers, health supplements, farm implements, fuel, poor quality food, health insurance, etc under their umbrella and still do well:
Modeling poor farm methods that are destructive; prone to failure/need crop insurance; require lots of heavy equipment, pumps, piping; need expensive GMO seeds, weed killers, amendments; destroys natural fertility; loses topsoil (carbon rich soil); contributes to more overall pollution than stated in UN reports; adds to general soil degradation; high tech 'climate saving' *expensive* tech that is patented and requires expensive maintenance and parts etc adds to profits.
Selling poor quality, low-nutrition foods and livestock feeds; and convincing others to sell poor quality food and feeds (usually in ignorance) contributes to human and animal obesity, malnutrition; sales of supplements, medicines; etc.

Bad methods that contribute to the problem means more profit. Things labeled 'sustainable' are often greenwashed code-words for the 'same-old, same-old' practices.
In the US we have more than *seven hundred areas* that have been destroyed by conventional farming methods and can no longer be used for farming.


Restoration ag is profitable, but restoration ag is reasonably and ethically profitable as opposed to the heavily exploitive methods of conventional conglomerate ag.

[robertcircleone]

Ricky, I've been vegan for over 50 years but I would have no issue with lab-grown meat, eggs and dairy. However, I know a lot of vegans that would greatly resist eating such products. If meat eaters eat the products then animal farming is done and dusted and that is good enough for most vegans (and animal rightists). So, bring it on, I say.

[Pushing_Pixels]

These technologies have the potential to provide so many benefits to both humankind and the environment. While it will no doubt disrupt some communities and some people's livelihoods, the drastic reduction of the wasteful, damaging pastoral industries will be a boon to humanity. Just the amount of fresh water that will be saved is enough reason to pursue it, let alone the huge increase in land area available for other purposes, both pastoral and agricultural land no longer used for feeding animals instead of people. We could end deforestation and even reverse it. Not to mention the drastic reduction in GHG emissions. It's a win!

[RJ-ccfz]

111 acres for 1 person to be continuously fed??? Not likely at all. Many have survived just fine feeding their entire family with less than 111acres

[Tsuchimursu]

artificial true silk is what gets me most excited out of anything here. affordable quality "natural" fiber without the devastation of cotton farms? yes please. (not that the raw ingredients used in the prices are impact free)

[thirdnormalform]

There is plenty of land to provide humanity with real food. The technology to accomplish this is called permaculture.

[NeoShameMan]

Correction: the issues isn't that the product is identical to the source, the issue is the micronutrient you might miss and that we haven't identify and which might be beneficial. Also looks at the diversity of "designer eggs" in japan, where each chicken is fed in certain way to have eggs be as nutritious and flavorful, rot duplication of identified useful substance will only flatten everything to a poor commonality, it' has already happen for food and we lost diversity in fruits, like in banana variety, and our tastes suffer from it.

[stevedunlop]

Great video Ricky. I am involved in agriculture and it give me something to think about for the future of the company I work for .

[marklewus]

On the topic of lost jobs, my great grandfather started out making horse saddles in the late 1800s, a common career at the time. Almost nobody does that anymore. I made my living in the software industry, and I had a much higher standard of living than he did. The same will happen here. The transition will be difficult for sure, but in the end the jobs we create will be much better than the ones we lose.

[username]

111 acres per person? An acre of wheat yields 3 million calories. At 2, 000 calories per day, single acre can feed 4 people for a year. That is 400x lower. Of course you need crop rotation to keep the soil healthy but so it won’t be that high but definitely at loss less than 110 acres per person.

[milo-qhcv]

so this is what caused the zombie apocalypse 10 years from now. T travel finally answered the question.

[HB]

111 acres for 1 year per person?? Is this a joke?

[alexandreblais]

honestly, to those who are worrying about jobs being lost, dont be. Theres gonna be a whole ton of new jobs coming with this. Now we gonna need so many mechanics and labour workers in the meat facilities. its just a change of jobs, not a loss.