Super Dense Planet around a low Metal Star far outside the galactic plane makes no sense!

preview_player
Показать описание
Super Dense Planet around a low Metal Star far outside the galactic plane makes no sense!

Most stars reside within the Galactic plane but some stars have been found way outside this and are thought to be on highly eccentric orbits. Most of these stars are thought to have no companions and are believed to be very old stars with very low metal content. Now for the first time they have discovered on that not only has a planet orbiting it, but this planet is a rocky body (something that is considered very rare). More strange is that this planets orbit implies it must be very dense making the story of a low metal star seem implausible. Is there a different way of looking at this?

Please consider supporting this channel through:

Follow me on:

References:

#electricuniverse #plasmauniverse #seethepattern
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Your visual content adds so much to the narrative. Thank you for your work on these, so appreciated!

beaelectric
Автор

This video, means a lot to me, because: (1) It was published on my birthday, (2) hard lockdown in South Africa began on my birthday this year.

khwezimngoma
Автор

Page 8:30 illustrates a first approximation of Birkeland current BC distribution along the galactic disc. However it is not as simple. There are primary and secondary BC in consideration.

Primary BC :
Feeds (energize) the galaxy at the polar regions (also defines galactic N and S poles) then exit at the equatorial region of the galaxy central.

Primary BC is responsible for the birth of a galaxy, and the subsequent energy feed to the system, galaxy.

Secondary BC :
Is the remainder of primary BC leaving the galaxy at the equatorial region. (also defines N and S Pole of planets in the galactic disc, to be perpendicular to the primary poles)

Secondary BC is responsible for the birth and energy feed of the next generation quasar, suns, planets and moons.

Spiral arm?
If the parent galaxy doesn’t rotate we will see a linear radial stretch of galactic arms. Since it rotate, we are seeing spiral arms. And from spiraling direction (cw vs ccw) we are able to determine if we are looking at the N pole or not. (ccw = N pole).

philoso
Автор

Valid questions and observations. Well done. Thanks for sharing.

willembont
Автор

Rederer !! would say the disk is flat, why would it be thick and thin ? it is spinning at the same rate across the plain ( it would have to be or it will spin apart the same thinking with thick and thin ?? ) so I would think uniform ? The surface of water is flat I reckon water could be a good medium to see if it gets thick when putting rotating currents through it... swirling a bucket or even a river, but where else do we see thick and thin in electrical principles ? ( maybe matter is affected but not the trend )....just a thought...( been watching river videos....fascinating. Dr Schauberger, the Birkeland of rivers ). You don't keep still, I have been following but so much to soak in, its great !! thx....

grahamhurlstone-jones
Автор

Can't wait on this vid. Nice topic!

ShifuCareaga
Автор

@See the Pattern animations made with Space Engine?

theelectricorigins
Автор

Solar system heading in galactic space?
Our artist has an error on - page 5:50. Artist assume that solar system is moving in a direction along its equatorial plane. Any projection, theory or speculations based on that is up for scrutiny.

Actually solar system travels northwards along a path shared by one of a spiral arm in the Milky Way.

If artist is right, our Milky Way would show up running in parallel +/-23.5* to horizon in the equatorial regions. But we are witnessing that the Milky Way runs at 90*+/-23.5* to the horizon. That indicates error in artist’s work.

That is another example showing that our academia and mainstream journals were not always right.

philoso
Автор

According to the Enuma Elish, Sol had one, original, companion: Tiamat, the watery Mother.

theaquarian
Автор

Great Presentation!
As Above, So Below Mates/Fellow hUmans!.... Is there a "Connection" between the "Rotation Patterns" of Our Earth's Weather Patterns & Events/Ocean & Wind Currents/Bio-Cellular & DNA Structures/Atomic & SubAtomic Collective Motions and Galactic/Universal Patterns?"
As the Speaker pointed out, there are many influences and conditions that affect location, movement and functionality! Various levels of ElectroMagnetic, +/- Charged Electric Current Capacitance Areas of the Current Web, and many others of known/unknown causation!?!
MainStream Scientists - "Pinch Me with a "Human Collective Factual-Science Based Answer!"

deejames
Автор

Remarkable. Another thing I thought we should consider. This planet might not have been birthed along with its current star. It might have been torn away from another star and came into a close in orbit with this new one. This star might not be its mother.

fredhoupt
Автор

first human to answer, still swinging and euhm sad the chat thing is no more.. this is a cool discovery, it is making a galactic orbit toroidal like, thats certainly not indicating a strong magnetic influence, impossible.. :p thanks Gareth (gonna check my mails :p)

runs_through_the_forest
Автор

The references should be to LH1815 B but they ones in the description sub to articles about mammoth bones.

JoeDeglman
Автор

Page 8:29 depicts an incorrect mapping of Birkeland current to a galaxy. We can use a primary and secondary filament model.

Primary BC feeds (exclusively) at each polar region of planet galaxy and not directly share by planets along its arms.

Secondary BC exits along the equatorial region / plane / disc of a galaxy (ie 90-degrees) of primary filament. These secondary filaments energizing all activities in each arm. To pinch form planets as well as polar feed energizing planets after birth, regulate separation between polar aligned planets and provide magnetic force to direct planets in uniform angular motion along the disc of its parent galaxy.

philoso
Автор

Page 4:00 Toroidal shape? Yes but is an spiral toroidal but a closed loop toroidal, within the galaxy.

philoso
Автор

well there are super airy planets it only makes sense that there are super dense ones wouldn't be balanced otherwise

darkquaesar
Автор

Page 5:35 no, not all stars or planets were born shooting out of the polar axis as most would believe it to be, like an inverse water drain hole, a cyclone or funnel cloud. We have done it again and again inadvertently, apply atmospheric phenomena to model galaxy and quasar.

philoso
Автор

If it really is a 2003 discovery, the behind the scenes discussions must have been heated!

stevenverrall
Автор

Page 8:00 stars were born and live along a galactic arm are organized by the same branch of BC in the arm. Stars are not free drifting, otherwise there will be no galactic arm and soon replaced by frequent collision. That are bound and organized by electromagnetic force.

Stars were born along a branch filament of BC, polar aligned at birth in NS, NS…NS order which keep them from drifting apart. If two adjacent “electrostatic charged” members have gotten too close and before collision, will initiate an electrostatic discharge leaving both of them equally charged in equal polarity. That is repulsion. Electric force is 39th order stronger than gravity. However gravity is useful in an orbital system and not polar aligned system within the galactic arms.

philoso
Автор

So watching this video got me wondering...

Many sources readily tell us how far the solar system is away from the galactic center, but what is less discussed is where we are from the edge of the flat side of the disk.

The first source on Google claims that it's actually difficult to figure that out, but with the currently accepted thickness of 1000 Lightyears, Earth potentially sits at 65 Lightyears or thereabouts above the true center of the disk, so we are 500-65=435 Lightyears from the top edge of the disk.

If that is so, and this Star mentioned is only 92 Lightyears (if I heard correctly) away from us, then how does this star fit outside the disk?

This is my first ever YouTube comment, so I'm finally acting on the admonition to be brave and be curious... I stink at putting myself out there XP

michaelmcdonald