Nuclear energy in Australia | The Daily Aus #shorts

preview_player
Показать описание

#thedailyaus #news
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

God if only other countries had similar issues

jenniferroe
Автор

Fragile nukes on a fragile electric grid
6, 470 TWh vs 245 TWh capacity.
26 times more electricity to no fossil CO2

Until the FRAGILE national electrical grid is included at the beginning of all videos then utter confusion will continue and governments will change for the wrong reasons.

The Australian national electricity grid is fragile and lightweight because it is extremely expensive to EXPAND and too valuable to waste with fragile nuclear reactors.

When you include the grid footprint within the nuke plant footprint then you are thinking like a real engineer. 🤔

Construction engineers include the extent of what has to be built and the UNIT COSTS.
To replace CO2 emissions, consider the following.

245 TWh in 2023. Electricity energy in Australia.
6, 470 TWh in 2023. Total energy used in Australia.

Electricity 245, 000 GWh in 2023
245, 000 GWh ÷ 6, 470, 537 GWh = 3.8%

26 times more clean electricity
26 times more electricity grid capacity
Australian grid is $TRILLIONS and 100 years to build.

26 times more for a country with a $1TRILLION GDP.
And decades and decades and decades of construction.

Fragile nukes on the fragile national electrical grid ???? Let's get real. 😮

CivEng degree, UNSW, Australia. 1975.
Decades in construction including grid transmission, fossil fuel electricity generation plants, urban infrastructure upgrade and general construction.

stephenbrickwood
join shbcf.ru