Would you believe the witness or the footage. .? #shorts #UFO

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I love footage, even if it sucks it gives You a real idea of what the Witness saw.

DarkStarX
Автор

Im a witness of almost the same thing. In my case it was 10 meters away from me.

sunnybureau
Автор

The combination is better.But just amateur footage is very convincing.✌️🙏🇺🇲🗽🛸

israelhernandez-sgmt
Автор

Saw a news video of it. Maybe it wanted to show off? Maybe it appeared that way due to a lack of being able to properly perceive it.

blank
Автор

Witness perception can be distorted by bias or belief systems, so I place more value on the video. I don't exclude the witness statements.

hidesinlonggrass
Автор

Gotta love both like this case! Adds an extra level of "why would this person lie or make this up and go through this effort of faking footage?

rbee
Автор

Both seal the deal. Not saying that's proof everytime, but helps when both back each other up.

adamjohnson
Автор

I love your channel. Been a while since I've had time to catch up.
Doesn't Robert look like Joe Rogan 😅

TravisFlickinger
Автор

One without the other, is not as strong of a case as with both facets of evidence. However, witness testimony alone is enough for a murder conviction. So, why all the skepticism against witness testimony?? All the parrots chirp in with what they "Believe, " which is ultimately hypocritical of them.

larrysoz
Автор

Footage doesn't always tell the story of the experience

hectorgonzalez
Автор

Neither believing nor disbeliving witness testimony or footage taken is the action I take when coming into awareness of such phenomena.

Knowledge, memory, and experience is always limited. Such limitation will always bring conflict.

To come upon that which follows no discernable way or which is seemingly without limitation, the action must be free from the limitation and ways of which one sets upon oneself.

Not to say that knowledge, memory and experience doesn't have its place in getting down to the bottom of this. In fact, someone who acts from choiceless awarness becomes far more precise, detailed and critically focused.

WingZeroDuality
Автор

I encountered the same type object 25 ft away and temp blinded me but my experience included 2 separate objects one that hovered over my head about 150 ft above and came down in front of me 25 ft away a mana ray Grey object slowly flying slowly away no noise

glennfisher
Автор

A good question is what do we want from uap or if there are others? Maybe we don't want or need their apple. After reviewing the comments, I think they want a calender of events.

BurgerMeisterGang
Автор

Hi Cristina.
Video evidence is becoming more meaningless by the minute. Unless it's recorded on an old camcorder.
I think witnesses should have the same gravity as a murder witness.

petebarnes
Автор

I can assess the body language, voice and facial expressions of a witness better that I can assess a footage, so...

Ben_the_Ignorant
Автор

OH dear, sounds like another case of someone not understanding the concept of 'focus and out of focus'
we see it ALL the time on the toob, people over zooming causing a lack of focus 'flare' which changes a tiny pin point of light into a "massive orb with shimmering patterns swirling across it's surface"
PLEASE don't take my word of it, go outside when it's dark, find a 'point of light' it doesn't matter what, a street light in the distance, even a star, point you phone camera at it and zoom to the max, hey presto, 'tiny point of light' is now a "massive shimmering orb"
If one is looking at a 'light in the sky' HOW is it that so many people state it's size and distance with such confidence? if you don't know what you are looking at, you can't even begin to judge it's size OR it's distance from the observer. just sayin.

FatherJack-spgc