Jackson’s Supreme Court Hearing: Key Moments and Takeaways | WSJ

preview_player
Показать описание
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination to the Supreme Court moved forward with the conclusion of her confirmation hearing, which featured tense exchanges over her sentencing record and recognition of the historic nature of the proceedings. Photo: Jabin Botsford/Press Pool

More from the Wall Street Journal:

#KetanjiBrownJackson #SCOTUS #WSJ
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Janice Rogers Brown nomination by George W. Bush was the 1st nominated black female judge in 2003 but blocked by the democrats.

JohnHernandez-trqw
Автор

A historic moment for Democrats race based criteria.

bngr_bngr
Автор

I would say previous recent hearings were more hostile...

sarahy
Автор

Long Live The Great And Beautiful America

ravindertalwar
Автор

Russia starts buying gold at a fixed price. This price will be more profitable than the value of the dollar. Thus, Russia tied the value of the ruble to gold. The dollar has lost its gold backing and is becoming just paper. The ruble becomes a currency backed by gold. Thus began an indirect devaluation of the dollar and inflation in the United States. The Russian national currency becomes the golden ruble.

Evildr
Автор

I am confused isn't she the third black nominee or the third African-American the second woman of color the first bein g Sonia Maria Sotomayor she doesn't count very confusing he is the fifth woman to sit on the supreme Court of a different race we have African Americans already we had Celtic woman from Ireland where the Jewish race Italian Mediterranean race so is she the third African person the second woman of color and the fifth woman to sit on the supreme Court

tiboregoldberger
Автор

justice jackson doesn't understand biology, she cant tell a woman of consenting age from an under age boy from a samurai's shuku

happybeejv
Автор

She has no right to call herself a woman if she can’t define it

deborahthompson
Автор

2:30. The lights, heat and TVs in Boston and NYC buildings have been on normatively for the past 22 years. Does that mean that the normative status should be accepted as truth? If you wish to say that normative lawmaking is fine because Congress has not updated the laws, while watching half of the Judiciary Committee (the lawmakers) say that the laws are fine by them, you need to go work as an activist, not as a journalist.

learkingofalbion
Автор

I can’t believe she was given such a nomination hearing with little to no hostility while Gorsuch, Barrett and kavanaugh were literally crucified.

kambam
Автор

The Constitution is the highest law of the land. The Republican response was as predictable as could be. If Congress doesn't like sentencing then change the penalty.
Booker was rediculous.

kristensorensen
Автор

Great biased reporting from the Woke Street Journal

boybata
Автор

JANICE ROGERS BROWN !!! Sorry people. You lie

fredwinslow
Автор

She can't define what a woman ..Xi bless Bid3n for the

muchacho
Автор

so wsj and gang will hand down whatever they want

auro
Автор

Is she black? I can't tell. I'm not a dermatologist.

realhuman
Автор

She CANT define what a woman end of story. NOT QUALIFIED.

wwinnar
Автор

So glad to see that Ted Cruz finally started using synthetic oil in his beard and mullet. He should start getting much better mileage out of it.

Birdlab
Автор

Imagine getting a job based on race and gender? She must be proud. /s

jmesg
Автор

As Biden is saying Putin can’t stay in power, let’s remember how many times Obama said the same about Syria’s Assad, but they never acted, and never meant anything…
Obama on Syria: Assad Must Go | Wilson Center

omidpourhossein
welcome to shbcf.ru