Brexit Is 'Biggest Foreign Policy Blunder,' Ex-House of Commons Speaker Says

Ex-House of Commons speaker John Bercow said Brexit would be the biggest mistake since World War II and called for another referendum.

John Bercow is not a man of few words.
And now that he has been freed from the enforced neutrality of his job as speaker of Britain’s House of Commons, he has quite a few things to say. Brexit? A historic mistake. Donald Trump? A leader who has said “loathsome and despicable” things.
“I am liberated now to say what I think,” said Bercow, who retired last week after a decade running the daily business and debates of Parliament’s lower chamber. The speaker’s job made Bercow a global celebrity, as people around the world tuned in to watch him referee bruising parliamentary battles over Brexit with booming cries of “Or-derrr!”
He thinks leaving the European Union is Britain’s “biggest foreign policy blunder” since World War II, an error that will leave the country weakened economically and diplomatically.
“We’re in a world of power blocs and of trade blocs,” Bercow told The Associated Press in an interview Thursday. “And it makes more sense for the U.K. to be part of that power bloc called the European Union and part of that trade bloc called the European Union.”
He’s not arguing that Brexit would “spawn mass poverty,” though most economic forecasts say it would damage the economy.
“But I think that we will suffer in trade terms and suffer in terms of global standing and influence,” Bercow said. “The best course for the U.K. is to remain.”
Bercow’s words will confirm the suspicions of critics who accused him of favoring Brexit opponents while he was in the speaker’s chair.
He denies showing bias — “I facilitated all the voices and all the views on Brexit” — but fully acknowledges he interpreted Parliament’s rules in ways that let legislators take control of the agenda at key points.
The upshot is that, three and a half years after British voters chose 52%-48% to leave the EU, multiple government attempts to complete Brexit have failed.
Some British politicians — even some of those who voted in 2016 to remain in the bloc — now say the country must honor the result of the referendum. But Bercow insists the 2016 vote “isn’t the final word on the subject” and says it would be democratic to hold a new public vote on EU membership.
“In 2016, people voted by a narrow margin for departure, but they didn’t vote for a destination,” said Bercow, who is also stepping down as a member of Parliament after 22 years. “There wasn’t a consensus and there isn’t a consensus now. And there’s great disagreement as to what sort of Brexit there should be.”
Britain is currently in the midst of an election campaign dominated by Brexit, with all 650 seats in the House of Commons up for grabs in the Dec. 12 vote.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson pushed for the early vote after Parliament thwarted his plans to take Britain out of the EU as scheduled on Oct. 31. Johnson hopes his Conservatives can win the vote, pass his Brexit divorce deal and get the country out of the 28-nation bloc by the next deadline of Jan. 31.
Bercow says it would be “perfectly reasonable” for Parliament to put Johnson’s deal back to the people in a referendum.
He said there’s a strong argument that “the process started with the people in the form of the 2016 referendum, and it should finish with the people in the form of a referendum in 2020.”
“I don’t see how more democracy can be undemocratic,” he added.
A London cab driver’s son who began his political career in the 1980s as a right-wing acolyte of Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Bercow has become a hero to liberals in Britain and abroad.
He says his political views shifted when he began to see the Conservatives as — in a phrase coined by former Prime Minister Theresa May — “the nasty party.” He thinks the greatest achievement of Britain’s recent Conservative governments was legalizing same-sex marriage.
In Parliament, he’s proud to have helped set up a nursery for the children of lawmakers and staff.
Bercow angered some on the political right by saying in 2017 that Trump shouldn’t be allowed to address Parliament, an honor given to some of his predecessors, including Barack Obama.

TICTOC ON SOCIAL:

TicToc by Bloomberg is global news for the life you lead. We are a 24/7 news network that covers breaking news, politics, technology, business and entertainment stories from around the globe, supported by a network of Bloomberg’s 2,700 journalists across 120 countries.

[earthman]

I respect John Bercow. I'd like to see him as Prime Minister. He's the only one with integrity and honour earned. A true Leader.

[cmconley]

Just because he plainly doesn’t agree with the Brexiteers, doesn’t mean he was working against them. It is not Fmr. Speaker Bercow’s fault that 3 different PMs could not come up with a Brexit plan that could pass muster in Parliament. Some things really are too complex for a popular vote; Brexit is one of those things. That where Cameron made his biggest mistake: making the referendum binding, with full force of law, rather than an expression of popular sentiment.

In essence, the 2016 referendum should have asked British citizens “Do you want Parliament to see if an acceptable deal can be reached to allow for the orderly exit of the UK from the EU?” By making it non-binding, Britain would not have been at such a disadvantage in negotiations with Brussels on Brexit. The binding nature of the referendum gave the EU power to extract more concessions from London. Those concessions were not acceptable to Parliament or the Britain at large.

First rule of negotiation: don’t offer your ideal resolution first. Don’t back yourself into a corner. Always leave an escape route open.

[tomessmith]

imagine living in a country where a queen appointed all officials and when you got to "vote" they refuse and say you're wrong and following the constitution would be a "mistake"