Nasa officially revealed New SpaceX’s Starship cargo lunar lander design...

Nasa officially revealed New SpaceX’s Starship cargo lunar lander design...
===
00:00 - 01:21: Intro
01:22 - 05:26: Starship cargo lander
05:27 - 07:52: Challenges on the Moon
07:53 - 10:26: LTV launch mission
10:26 - 10:41: Conclusion
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starship
==
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
Our video content is referenced by video sources at these sites:
HUGE THANKS TO:
iamVisual:
===
Nasa officially revealed New SpaceX’s Starship cargo lunar lander design...
In a significant development for NASA's lunar exploration plans, the agency has unveiled the design of SpaceX's Starship cargo lunar lander. This unveiling marks a crucial step forward in NASA's ambitious goal of returning to the Moon within the next few years.
Nasa officially revealed New SpaceX’s Starship cargo lunar lander design...
The Starship lunar cargo lander design showcases a sleek and futuristic appearance, embodying the cutting-edge technology that SpaceX is known for. With its streamlined silhouette and advanced features, the lander represents a significant leap in lunar exploration capabilities.
However, as with any complex engineering project, there are bound to be challenges and potential issues to address. While the design of the Starship lunar cargo lander is undoubtedly impressive, it may still face hurdles in terms of technical feasibility, operational efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
Nasa officially revealed New SpaceX’s Starship cargo lunar lander design...
In today's episode of Great SpaceX, we'll delve deeper into the details of the Starship lunar cargo lander design, exploring its innovative features and assessing any potential challenges that lie ahead.
===
To be resolved, thank you.

[grizzworld]

According to your narration I must be more then 100 years old, because i was alive and well, (about 10 years old) when the first Apollo lunar missions took place.😁

[albertross]

Why did you say that it's been more than a century since the last human landing on the moon?

[aantaug]

Am I that old that it's been more that a century since I watched the last moon landing?

[Tommork-bqms]

First...
Really
First
Someone has to land something upright!

[mikeklife]

There's only one problem I see. There's no way, in the low lunar gravity, that a starship is going to land straight up like that, empty of fuel on the bottom and top heavy with cargo, & NOT TIP OVER.
They need to start planning on re-positioning the thrusters so it can do a soft belly landing. At least for the first 100 or so ships, until some pad lockdown mechanism can be brought and assembled so that a starship can land and be secured at the base.

[wxb]

What if Starship was able to land on its side? That'd be interesting. Sorta like a Winnebago/Millennium Falcon...

[TexanBurgler]

They should have 3 angled grapleguns for landing stabilisers to eliminate tipping over and reduce risk.

[the-witness]

Wouldn't it make more sense for the doors to open downward to lower the center of gravity? No matter how negligible it is, the stability of the craft when landed can't be overestimated.

[michaelbowers]

That neat and interesting, that good day wow Amazing technology Star 🌟 Ship upgrades add on cool. Wow.😅

[benedictmarshall]

The issue of landing on the Moon is going to test SpaceX to the max. Level landing areas are needed! Build those in advance, (and make sure the rocket’s aiming capacity is up to the mark), before attempting full Moon landings. How about pre-constructed landing pads with built-in stabilizers (to help guide the rocket and clamp around it on landing). That way, the rocket itself would not require heavy legs.

[MikeKisil]

I like the idea rocket land on side for moon landing said xcx237 arguments for are many tricky one lift off

[pedrosura]

If you want lander stability, land it horizontal. Easier to lower payloads and no need to tip it iver later on. Of course there are drawbacks, just like landing vertically has drawbacks

[rodjelen]

For safer unloading...and recycling of the vessel itself...you need fewer systems...up there..✌️💙

[MikeKisil]

Oh wait a minute have separation both landing separately nice to have work shed on moon for future use too

[fjmeckel]

“More than a century since NASA’s last human landing mission”??? I guess that makes me 108!

[slartybarfastb]

The entire investigation, yes that can be a good thing, is to decide if the current approach needs adjustment.
If that is seen as a good thing, then it's best to delay and have another look.
If not, then use the architecture you have, Make it better.

[clavo]

YAAY! Autonomous LTV makes good sense. An auto homing and a few pre-programmed routes with obstacle deviation, might also be a good thing to be able to remotely enable.
My fantasy is a: land and tip-over Superheavy spaceship, that can lay flat and be useful as a horizontal spaceship warehouse, wherein the fuel tanks can be opened accessed and used for workshops and other utility purposes.

[ricchamen]

Lunar dust will effect the lift system. Fact.

[jorgesolis]

So now, 25 more years of try outs and tests before we set foot forward to the moon....

[jorgesolis]

Can all this be done at the Nevada's desrt, alsp?