Constitutionality in the Trump Verdict #shorts

Erwin Chemerinsky and Randy Zelin tackle the Trump trial verdict. Chemerinsky argues that Trump had ample notice and opportunity to defend himself, leading to a clear and emphatic guilty verdict on 34 counts. Zelin counters, claiming the jury instructions were unconstitutional, likening them to a "pu pu platter" that disregarded the need for unanimous decision-making. Is the verdict just, or should it be overturned?

===================================

===================================

#shorts #foryou #fyp #youtubeshorts

[bobdecarlo]

One accounting error, entered 34 34 felonies? 🤣🤣🤣

[Jaye-tsko]

The defense never helps prosecutors assume he knows what they mean.😲

[jschnell]

Stop telling the truth. People don’t know what that is these days

[bobparker]

This is only believable to trump’s sycophants

[shawnr]

I will see how the verdicts fair in the Appeals Court.

[Gerald_TheCat]

Kangaroo Kourt is what we the people see. Go spout your propaganda to your followers

[cg]

These clowns go out of their way trying to defend that career criminal.
34 out of 34 means he did every bit of those crimes. Dude is guilty as Sin.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[chaosgilleon]

I'd rather have a felon in office who actually cares about this country and wants to make it great. Then have a career politician who knows how to squeeze every dime out of the American people to line his own pockets.

[ralphinator]

Trump raised your taxes and said China paid it. Then Trump raised your gas prices and said it would be great for the oil companies.