PDE Canonical Forms of First Order Linear PDE

Use invite code - NEW25 while registering on app and get 25 free coins (limited period offer). Use these coins while unlocking paper/app.
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

Playlists –

[sundaysimonisah]

Thanks for being a good teacher, I really enjoyed the lesson.

[waizkhan]

Thanks sir very conceptual questions you taught us. Every thing is clear for canonical form of 1st order linear PDE. thanks again

[revvin]

Clear voice and excellent explanations
Thank you!

[justinefundi]

This is great...wonderfully explained, easily understood

[-bhaskarsamal]

Thanks for this sir
We are grateful to you ☺️

[kulkanttete]

Thank you so much sir your video is really a beneficiary one & to the point talking .
THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR

[aleezakanwal]

Very nice method of teaching. Love you from pakistan

[bughead]

thankyou so much sir, understood it perfectly

[mathswithrahibkalyar]

Thank you to make diffcult topics easy to understand... Thanks alot sir

[rakshit]

Thank you soo much sir. This is very helpful.

[umangaggarwal]

Thankyou Sir. Your videos are really helpful. Sir plz cover the whole gen syllabus as soon as possible...😶 DU maths gen exam of 3rd sem is on 6 December... Kindly upload remaining topics... Thanks.

[tannugarg]

Amazing video. Keep uploading more. Really helpful. Thankyou so much

[PedroLucas-fsmc]

If you define zeta to be the new variable whose constant set defines an orientable manifold y=y(x), then wouldn t d(zeta)/dx / d(zeta)/dy = -y'(x) which in turn is defined to be B(x, y)/A(x, y). So when you replace u_x and u_y by u_zeta and u_eta the vanishing term should be u_zeta not u_eta, you said otherwise while going over the theory i believe.

[DeepakChauhan-zhnw]

Thank you sir.lt's very helpful for me.

[sumitarauta]

Clear voice and excellent explanation 👍

[vanshikasinghal]

Why does the Jacobian need to be non-zero?

[janmejay_sharma_VishwakarmaJi]

Sir its pdf is not available on ally learn website

[slavanyacreation]

This is very helpful plz do more examples plz plz 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[kratikagarg]

Sir canonical form of Second order pde ki video upload kr dijiye .this video is very nice.

[saumyasood]

Sir what if when we take ita =y and the Jacobian turns out to be xy / x / y (as in the determinant is a multiple of x and/or y in that case do we have to change ita Or proceed as you told in the video