Testing MQ-25 Aboard an Aircraft Carrier

preview_player
Показать описание
Visit a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier deck with some of our teammates as they talk about supporting #MQ25 during its recent flight deck demonstration. In December 2021, the team tested the unmanned aerial refueler's remote control system aboard a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier to ensure MQ-25 can move around the deck just like other aircraft.

More great aviation videos:

Our social media handles:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

nice to see a Boeing program seemingly on track

christophernolan
Автор

A modular integrated platform like no other.

icare
Автор

X-47B operated was admitted to be operating off carriers more than ten years ago. Anecdotally (someone told me a story) it was a lot earlier than that.

cageordie
Автор

Yes I brings my memories back as a child

feliciaparivechio
Автор

A thoroughly vetted aircraft. Amen! Small steps. Thank you for continuing to share those steps and the ongoing story of the development of the MQ. A new generation of Naval Aviation takes form.

pastorrich
Автор

Fascinating to see a tanker with the M designator. Typically that designator is reserved for UCAVs.

flatbill
Автор

It looks like Boeing has finally back on track. So far, there is no incident happened 😀

amorzamsahadan
Автор

Congratulations Teams Boeing and The military teams up a thick of new Remote control planes and products....Let's leave our military personnel on deck ..and out of "Harms "..( jag) way and let Remote Control do the Dangerous work 💪👷🙄

bradfordthompson
Автор

I get that it’s a tanker, but it seems a little thin. Does it have the ability to mount droptanks? Or conformal tanks. What’s the maximum takeoff weight or maximum airborne weight? Assuming you’d take off, refuel then land and run tanker missions like that, although that sounds inefficient now that I said it

TheWizardGamez
Автор

My questions after watching this video are: How well will the MQ-25 hold up to EMP pulses? How well will it hold up to outside frequency interference? How connected is it to the Internet or systems connected to the Internet?

wbert
Автор

OMG Thats where I live! near SAFB! My mom tells me storys about my grandpa working at the base.

Wadethewallaby
Автор

My country is not a NATO member, instead we are neutral country so its impossible for us to have this but i hope that boeing will develop this MQ 25 to be a uninteruptible UCAV. Its gonna be great to see it side by side with F 35 or the next 6th gen NAVY fighter

Chimpunk
Автор

Any flying asset over water must be able to safely ditch/land on water if no ppl on board & if ppl on board MUST hve diff power supple & or mult engines & or pods.

jamesmerkel
Автор

We are in what can be called the future.

zackbryan
Автор

Compro 3.000 unidades para a força aéria brasileira e o projeto e a tecnologia para o Brasil

sergiodesouzajunior
Автор

Doesn't a 737 p-8 planes fly next to a kc _46 Tankers could they also help with as extra eyes while planes refuel and as a distance platform to control Boeing remote control planes

bradfordthompson
Автор

Can't wait for the day when an entire carrier air wing is composed of UCAVs. That isn't going to happen soon, but eventually it will. Then we will be able to truly execute power projection in a revolutionary way.

spydude
Автор

It be incredible 🙌 To team this plane, MQ-25 Together with BOEING T-6 TO FLY TOGETHER as a wing man team HAULING FUEL, WEAPONS REMOTE

bradfordthompson
Автор

When you take the man out of the war, there is no longer anything for man to fear from waging war. The people will then, truly suffer.

kborak
Автор

I was on a carrier & they could (&probably, eventually WILL) outfit these with weapons, bombs or anything. You could literally double the ratio of planes to drones. I bet in 10 yrs. they will phase out real pilots.

frankgordon