Physics Slander - Part 2

Second part of the physics slander series. Subscribe and comment your ideas for part 3 and like the video to sponsor PhD students in need.

[rosykindbunny]

I understood one joke. I think that means I passed AP physics.

[CorruptedSpider]

This is not the slander we deserve, but the one we need!

[Mani_Kandala]

Ngl that Dr Strange one was a pretty accurate representation

[Insanearc]

I deadass love how whenever theres any infinity in continuity we just go "nuh uh" Substitute it as a variable and try to cancel it out or have it divided with 0 💀

[norman_z]

00:05 Missed opportunity to make only half of the guy disappear

[MemesWithTheLizard-ecuy]

The fact that I understood like half of these things because of youtube means uhh






L SCHOOL
L DEGREES
L COLLEGE
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA





I am 68 years old btw.

[djamilahiller]

This made me laugh so hard^^ thank you! excited for the next part :)

[rf]

As a phisic and math passionate, I love this video

[Literally__Nobody]

The 0 in evidence of loop quantum gravity is a loop

[syedhaider]

This is absolutely fantastic. Laughed so fckn hard

[arkkaushik]

A Sydney Coleman quote to end the video nice

[jasonduong]

0:52 Does it mean that Dark Matter is in plain sight, or is it like Dark Matter is really difficult to find?

[VCLegos]

It sounds like we need a new theory. This one seems broken.
-some engineer

[Arch_fm]

Yeah hilarious, I understood everything for reals

[The-realness-is-baffling]

I understood the room temperature superconductor one 🥹

[familyquek]

Sadly only the first one made me laugh

[abrarmulla]

(Not trying to sound in a rude or offensive tone)
I never made this video or any video for this channel and I am not part of this video or any video of this channel

[NeroDefogger]

1: not even gonna bother to check, I guess, but the joke is getting very old already, surely yall can come up with something fresh...
2: literally no? literally that is the problem? literally what?
3: I guess? I wish that was me...
4: not sure what that means for functions, but I'm pretty sure real physicists don't care about weird function's properties... even less to make a big deal like that...
5: alright ACTUALLY a funny one, this one is great, accurate and funny.
6: no.
7: I'm pretty sure that is just a skill issue, I don't know if we are even able to really measure those values accurately.
8: how do you expect evidence for something made up? do we have evidence for Russell's teapot?
9:
10: quantum physics are made up, that's how they deal with everything.
11: what?