Understanding the Common Law [No. 86 LECTURE]

preview_player
Показать описание

* * * * *

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Common law: Property, contract, tort, restitution.
1. First person acquire unowned object is owner
2. If you make a promise you should keep it.
3. If you engage in aggression, you engage in wrongful conduct.

joeboxter
Автор

The Common Law.
Cause No harm,
No loss,
No breach of peace,
No deceit within contract.

Together with our Constitution, Magna Carts 1215.
That covers any legislation, acts, or statutes.

Tommykennedy
Автор

so a minum wage violates common law by dictating the price of labor which is an exchange sale of ones labor

TheIrishdriven
Автор

Interesting material explained in a concise and logical manner. Thank you.

leonardmulrooney
Автор

The way you explain it makes everything so clear. I'm even going to review my rejection of "social contract" theory.

wenshu
Автор

This is fantastic. I found this extremely stimulating.

Yivarn
Автор

Oh my goodness I still get loooost. But I do know that UK common law is the same as New Zealand common law. If you want to hear an even simple explanation then listen to Bill Turner NZ

doreenstirling
Автор

The defining characteristic of common law is that it arises as precedent. Common law courts look to the past decisions of courts to synthesize the legal principles of past cases. Stare decisis, the principle that cases should be decided according to consistent principled rules so that similar facts will yield similar results, lies at the heart of all common law systems.

zedeyejoe
Автор

Can be used for matrimonial court ? For extreme unfair wrong unconscionable agreement?

maruhanayabi
Автор

objection here ... legal does not apply to common law = law of the land, whereas, legal applies only upon water, further, legal does not apply to a man or a woman, and only applies to a created fiction . Property trespass occurs upon any legal fiction with duties and obligations, administering property without right . Constructed fraud applies to all created fictions, that were involved with the society of today, which in fact operates only upon theft of property [your name and family name ] the creation of a legal fiction = your birth certificate . As a professor, please identify the section whereby legal [ roman civil law ], applies to a man or a woman . Please also identify the obligation [contract with full disclosure ] whereby a man or woman is obligated to obey civil law . If we were in a game of bull crap poker ; " I call any lawyer, BULL CRAP " . Professor or not . " T " ... Any from this society may answer for all to see, the answers to the questions posed . " T " ...

SuperChromer
Автор

Plainly, you have little knowledge of Common Law. Common Laws are the laws of the constitution or the law of the land. In consideration of common law, if anyone wrongs you, you have the right to receive damages for injury. should that person refuse to respond in damages, the outcome, could be death.
And stop referring to people. People are not subject to statutory laws.

tomtree
Автор

Karl lentz+Richard Epstein+mark gramery+bill Thornton+jc&shaman=common law of land☮️✝️☪️🔯✡️🕎🕉☯️💟

nocommentnoconsent
Автор

In Re : "natural law" for PROPOGATION of children (property?) ... AND FOR THE " NURTURING OF CHILDREN TO ADULTHOOD " ? ... ... ["king" Insurance Agent + "queen" Adjuster (?)]

Restitution?

Civil Law?

JamesDavid-ytec
Автор

After listen to most of the video and then reading a few of the comments. I reach a / the conclusion this man does not really understand what is common--- especially what is common law. He I fell would do well to go to a area of the world where people are just People and not influenced by legal-law. That is what is "common" to every man in the area and not what has become common knowledge between a layer/attorney and man/ that is the people.
Common is Kommon is common sense and not that which has been written down by some scholar.
thank you....

signaturelincoln
Автор

Yeah this guy don't know much. Under common law you can only use it, if you are a child of God. You can not use Maritime law, in common law. In Common law you have to use Trial by Jury. Not Jury trial. You are using the God given rights. Not the rights given by Statutory laws. All the people that play on the court belong to the same club. You as a child of God can not win against the game they play in. court. They know the game and how it is played. You are an infant in there game, you will get hurt. So you need one of them to repesent you. If you step into their game you will get hurt. Just like a basketball game. If you don't know how to play the game you can get hurt. You have to know who you are in Christ, to play common law. A person that belongs to their bar can not help you with Common law.

spgwood
Автор

From personal foot work there has been witness to nothing, but deviations for both the desperate desire of the natural law mariage contract, and the incelibacy that has struck society with mass social sexual repression, and socialising decades of delusions sits me here today that crime, and entrapment has been the means to acquire the best labour from the best men, and women.

zackrauch
Автор

UK common law is different to American Common law.

captainheinie
Автор

This is statutory common law... no mention of a Court of Record in Common law...

judgedarby
Автор

I just curiously wonder if teaching law in YouTube is lawful?

tonychin
Автор

'epstein'. they can't help themselves.

cindymoon