Brown v. Board of Education, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Review, Required Supreme Court Cases]

preview_player
Показать описание

AP HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDE (formerly known as the Ultimate Review Packet):

Additional HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDES (formerly known as Ultimate Review Packet):

Tiktok: @steveheimler
Instagram: @heimlers_history

In this video Heimler walks you through everything you need to know about the landmark case Brown v. the Board of Education. This is a required case for the AP Government curriculum, and so you'll need to know all about it in order to score well on your exam.

This case actually represents a series of cases that addressed the same issue, namely, racial segregation in schools. Schools had been segregated on account of the Supreme Court's "separate but equal" doctrine produced by another case, Plessy v. Ferguson. The Brown decision overturned that doctrine and ordered schools to be integrated.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

im so grateful for this nice bald man, thank you

Griddyale
Автор

so thankful for these videos man. been watching for two years now and you never cease to not carry my grade.

jade-dkhu
Автор

Before i moved i went to a previously segrgated school (this was in near present times to clarify) and i think it was built in the 1960 just to show the stalling

radicalsaturday
Автор

I love these videos! but you forgot to put the Shaw V. Reno case video in this playlist. Not a big deal but just thought I would point it out. (These videos are the only reason I'm passing AP Gov lol)

angelicart
Автор

facts
plessy v fegurson ruled seperate but equal, so schools were segregated. a brown family was denied admission to a white school.

const principal: violated equal protection clause

decision: seperate is not equal for schools

jbpewfz
Автор

Great video. When I look at Brown v. Board and Plessy v. Ferguson I see the Constitution as more a living document versus what I believe originalists view the Constitution as. Can you do a video to add clarity to what being an origanalist means as I see different opinions and definitions depending on who you read.

bugscranks
Автор

The history behind segregation is very confusing for young people to understand.
Blacks were not allowed to go to White schools but Whites could attend Black schools.
Students in Black schools were Blacks, Chinese, Japanese, Mexicans, Indo-Europeans, and Anglos.
Therefore not as segregated as you'd think.
The same goes for housing Blacks were not allowed to live just anywhere they wanted.
Therefore a Black Community consisted of Blacks, Korea Town, China Town, and Tokyo Town.
Where as White communities main focus was not to be mixed "Indo" which is a new breed of humans.👍
What they don't tell you is the State's ruling party were people living in Black communities.
Yet they want you to believe Black communities were inferior people when fact is most inventions, and working class people lived in Black communities.
And that is why the United States was nick named Black-Amerika until after WWII.
Thats when every Black community in every US State was flooded with Drugs & Guns by the US Government.

lordvonmanor
Автор

bro is the reason im passing civics LMAO

crazyfunguslady
Автор

Does not mean anything, just put segregation into the constitution and it's legal.

Affirmative action is not in constitution, it is a federal law.

We have a triangle-- constitution, federal law and Supreme Court decision

melvinsherrod
Автор

Thompson Betty Williams Lisa Hall Cynthia

니모-bw
Автор

There never had to be the riots each child that had a post office mailbox that every child in Alabama and America and around the world was to receive a medical education program packet inn the mail to do there home work onthere own time to learn about being a doctor or nurse no matter the stage of poverty the mailbox and mail did not care who a person was it was all to be done by the mail inn accordance with the local papermills that was making enough paper packets about a medical education program packet for every child on the earth

MarieDavis-xter
Автор

Joe biden supported separate but equal

tomnassar