Harald Walach | Towards a Postmaterialist Science – Report of the Galileo Commission

The remit of the Galileo Commission of the Scientific and Medical Network is to review information that point towards an expansion of science beyond a materialist worldview. Harald Walach has written such a report, which he presents. The argument starts with the insight that all human endeavors are necessarily founded on absolute presuppositions in the sense of Collingwood and that the current presuppositions of science are largely predicated on a materialist worldview. This has served us well up to a point. It seems that we have reached a stage in science and society at large, where an exclusive reliance on such a worldview could prove not only limiting, but dangerous. Evidence that points towards the necessity of broadening such a view comes from some areas of anomalistic science: reports of veridical cases of non-local perception during near-death experiences, the cumulated data-base of experimental parapsychology, evidence of case reports from children with memories of previous lives, to name but three. This type of phenomenology cannot be incorporated into the current world model. This is why these phenomena are largely ignored. If we, however, take these phenomena seriously, as the report suggests, we can broaden our view. The basic requirement for this is a twin acceptance of a world-model that provides for some non-locality and for consciousness to have some causal and possibly independent ontological status. A minimum consensus model would be a dual-aspect theory of consciousness. A model that can incorporate non-locality would either have to resort to a field, or to a generalized form of non-locality as derivable from a generalized quantum theoretical framework, as we have proposed. Such a broadened view would by necessity be inclusive and would lead to different types of research questions being pursued and would also propose an overall connectedness both of mankind, but also with nature and the planet at large. The ramifications for teaching and research are obvious and will be outlined.

Bio: Harald Walach has Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology and in History and Theory of Science. His research focuses on topics around consciousness and health and developing and testing a model for generalized nonlocality.

Recorded at the Society for Scientific Exploration Conference in Broomfield, Colorado 2019.

Special thanks to our Patreon Explorers for providing the support we need to keep our video content freely available online: Dr. CMC Toporow, Kathleen Erickson, Mark Crewson, Mark Urban-Lurain, Roger Nelson, Gene Thomas, and Sandy Wiener.

The SSE provides a forum for original research into cutting edge and unconventional areas. Views and opinions belong only to the speakers, and are not necessarily endorsed by the SSE.

[theLECox]

It is all very well and good that academic people are tackling this problem. What frustrates me is their seeming ignorance of others' attempts in the not-too-distant past to tackle this exact same problem. These could at least be mentioned as possibilities to look into!
Hubbard's work, for example, addresses:
A more workable model for the mind and for living organisms.
A more workable model for the source of physical experience.
A reasonably workable method for accessing and evaluating subjective experience (mental images, and memory).
An ethical system based on observations of what life is doing.
A way to use multi-valued logic where it applies, as opposed to always using binary logic.
Realize that all these issues have been addressed, workable answers have been arrived at - at least in terms of his goals and purposes - and these answers have been used to create a set of procedures that results in improved conditions.
Why is this work not worth studying and discussing?

[martin]

There is Subjective-Subjectivity & Objective-Subjectivity, as to the truly Objective, we can never know as to do so would be to experience it Subjectively, therefore "Science" also doesn't exist as such, as my "Science" would be different from your "Science", however we can communicate the similarities & differences between them so "Science" as with all subjects, is inter-subjective. Not all systems of logic are structured in the binary "either/or" form, some after Korzybski also include a "Both/ &" to which I added "Neither/ Something Else".