Top 3 Entitled Drivers Who Got Instant Karma

Video credit: David G, Reddit: u/hammilton96

Here are the top 3 entitled drivers who got instant karma! The first driver tries to cut off the cam car, but damages his truck instead. The second driver tries to go around traffic in the opposite lane, but gets owned by a truck coming through. The last driver finds out why you shouldn't drive through a construction zone.

#instantkarma #roadrage #shorts #dashcam #karma #roadsafety #baddrivers #karen

[DashCrashCam]

Which driver do you think deserved karma the most?

[mattbishop]

1st video looks like the dash cam driver sped up to block him out

[bryansummers]

"The cammer stands his ground"??? There's no "stand your ground" laws in traffic! The truck was ahead of the cam car!

[paulendsley]

I always find it ridiculous to call someone that would rather get into an accident than let somebody in the “good guy” in a scenario

[lucidreams]

The first one seems like the dashcam driver was the entitled one. The other driver* had plenty of space to merge and dude didn't let him.

[Ant]

First driver shouldn’t be on the road, that was 100% intentional and avoidable

[kariannmagana]

First one, okay, yes, the pick up driver is in the wrong for cutting the cammer off, however, the cammer shouldn't have sped up and slammed into the back of the pick up

[pollemar]

The first cammer should lose his license forever, and only him.

[DS-qzgu]

That first clip + commentary is 100% deliberately wrong to get people to comment. And yes, I’m aware it’s working, but I just want to say that that’s a scummy way to run your channel.

[lovelyjanuary]

The second two clips were good, the first one was not at all that pickup truck who was karma-deserving in that case since the dash cam car was insanely idiotic and pretty much an a-hole for speeding up on him like that when the truck was actually not doing anything wrong— just a tighter merging situation due to the (probably) near rush hour or midday traffic, which, if you’re from a city with many highways that look just like that and drive on them regularly, you’d be able to recognize the difference between the two pretty easily and would have no problem with the truck merging over that way since the HOV lane (as we call it) was going from two to a single one lane (like it typically would be most of the time anyway) and it was in no way unusual in terms of the way the truck was trying to do that safely but at the constant rate of speed that the traffic was moving at the time, which is the right thing to do in that case. LOVED the second one where the massive truck made the suv guy reverse in that opposite lane he tried to cut ahead of traffic with lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣 but even more when he says that it made the guy back up all the way to the end of the line (since I’m sure nobody was letting him in 😂🚚 So great.

[IGotsBadFeeling]

First clip... Just... let him in... good lord man.

[DrDeuteron]

The cammer stands his ground…..

Bro, what? This ain’t Florida and that’s not a home invasion

[Bartfast]

Why screw up your vehicle just to prove a point?

[Castle_RVN]

First driver in the pick up was merging. Merge like a zip. People just don't get this. MERGE!

[riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip]

In the first clip the cammer is obviously in a zipper merge and speeds up to prevent the other truck from merging. He's obviously at fault.

[scry]

first one looks like the dash cammer failed to zipper and sped up like a dummy

[SockerConny]

1st video both would have been found at fault due to the "last clear chance" law and insurance would have them pay for their own damages while raising their premiums.

[debbiejeffries]

The dash cam vehicle: Learned that standing his ground meant vehicle damage. NOT WORTH IT!

[dienekes]

The first cam car is at fault because of the Last Clear Chance doctrine.

[jadentetzlaff]

What kind of license do these people have? A fishin' license?!