Changing Her Mind

preview_player
Показать описание
The plaintiff says she sold a pearl necklace to the defendant, who complained about it and stopped her credit card charge. The defendant also claimed she mailed it back, but the plaintiff never got it. She’s suing for what she’s out. The defendant claims the necklace was flimsy, so she returned it and has the tracking number to prove it.

32-155
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

My head just about popped off when the defendant called the plaintiff a scam artist! The defendant was at fault here 100%. I HATE HATE HATE when shitty people get away with ripping others off!

bendaniel
Автор

How is the plaintiff a scam The defendant needs to really check her moral/ integrity compass

fwilliams
Автор

This case mad me FURIOUS. The credit card company AND the postal service failed the plaintiff and like she said, it’s exhausting and not even worth pursuing anymore. I hate that this happened smh.

ChelleysTelly
Автор

Defendant has some nerve calling the plaintiff a scam artist!! She is 100% the scammer and should be paying out of pocket! She’s a thief- period.

britanychere
Автор

The audacity of the defendant, she's the real scam artist

mashondaknight
Автор

The plaintiff even wore her rulers 📏 to court 😂🤣I love the sweater

mrshappilymarried
Автор

this is a perfect case of "no good deed goes unpunished". unfortunate for the plaintiff that she created a new contract for the return

spokelord
Автор

The defendant's face is on display for the world to see and her character is displayed for the world to know

t_the_rex
Автор

The worst type of customer. Buyers remorse. Manipulator.

ginatse
Автор

The defendant is an entitled brat. And to call the plaintiff a scam artist is beyond ridiculous. If the defendant had any integrity at all, she would go after the post office herself, then return any money received to the plaintiff. But she's just too plain selfish.

missy
Автор

That defendant was dispicable. She has zero dignity but then made it 100x worse by calling the plaintiff a scam artist. I’ve never wanted to fight a stranger so bad

jennylynx
Автор

I LOVE THE PLAINTIFF'S JACKET!
That was definitely meant for the defendant. 😆😆😆

jennifercowley
Автор

I hope the defendant sees this to see what people think about her. And the audacity of calling the plaintiff a scammer...

Monika-bcdq
Автор

I've just got a feeling that the defendant has those pearls at home.

gan-ban
Автор

I’m so glad that court is back in person.

JayyThao
Автор

She did not scam you! What a shame this ended up like this. From experience I say, she would get no where trying to sue the USPS, she would be tied up with them forever.

lolamaude
Автор

I was an Ebay seller for a few years. Like her I am meticulous with pictures and presentations. The defendant calling the Plantiff a scam artist is insulting and absolutely ridiculous.

mmmfun
Автор

I love the plaintiffs sweater, so much!!!

Rose-ptsx
Автор

I've done this before. I've bought a necklace online and even though there were measurements and a ruler in some images, I honestly thought the piece was bigger due to the images being closeups. It happens.

That being said, I immediately acknowledged it was all on me when I went back to the listing and saw the measurements after receiving the item. Not once did I ever have the arrogance to say it wasn't my fault and to try and get a refund for my error.

silvermillennial
Автор

My post office story - I mailed some VHS tapes to my sister in Japan back in the late 90s. This was before the internet was good so no streaming. I got the package back with all sorts of Japanese stamps on it. I was kind of angry since I was out $30 so I sent it again. A few weeks later I got a hand written apology in broken English from the Japanese postal service along with $64 in brand new American cash. The letter was hand written and said "we are solly, there is no excuse for this." (Yes it actually said 'solly'). I was blown away by this. I don't think I'd get that from the USPS.

thebookwasbetter