Canon 100-400 vs 70-200 with a 2X Teleconverter

preview_player
Показать описание


The total cost is pretty similar, so which is better? Will the teleconverter make the 70-200 noticeably less sharp at 400mm?

STARTER CAMERAS:

LANDSCAPE CAMERAS:

PORTRAIT CAMERAS:

WILDLIFE CAMERAS:

VIDEO CAMERAS:

DRONES:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This video provided me the answer I was looking for. Thanks! I am going to get a Canon 2X extender.

moviewatcher
Автор

Tony and Chelsea still following you every day! What I know I’ve, largely, learned from you and watch all your camera and lens reviews. Wonderful! Macro I learn from Don Komarechka whose new Macro book will be out at Christmas. He’s close enough to attend workshops. It’s been about five years now - you guys are inspirational ❤️🇨🇦

elisabethm.lafontaine
Автор

THANKS! You answered a question I had for a long time! I have the 70-200L and the 2X teleconverter, but I always wondered how the image quality compared to the 100-400L

kubotamaniac
Автор

Love your videos, , , love it even more when both of you are outside ..just talking and shooting ..

johngray
Автор

With 80D and now 6D2, with the 100-400LII and the 1.4X teleconverter you get 560mm while keeping 27 autofocus points at f8... so there's that to consider as well. Perhaps worth an update on the video.

AlvaroReguly
Автор

Thank you for doing this video, I was looking for this exact comparison and now my decision is made. You guys rock!

tbgtom
Автор

Great video…..  Always wondered about that lens combination and the final outcome!
Thanks for posting and sharing!

TheLoftStudios
Автор

please i need help i have 5d mark iii with 70-200 is2 2.8 i need to shoot soccer games at night and i dont have enoght zoom can i buy the 2x and still get good images ?

ledawytube
Автор

Hi Tony & Chelsea, thank you very much for this quick review, sweet & to the point. Just one additional question, did the focusing also worked as well with the 70-200 + 2X teleconverter? Since you guys didn't bring it up, I'm assuming focusing was about equally fast and accurate.

stanimal
Автор

What about the old 100-400 ? It seams the 70-200 with 2x TK is better ?

Daweisstebescheid
Автор

Holy crap you guys made this so much simpler than everyone else on youtube thank you!

jakewill
Автор

I am in the process of deciding between these for a trip at the end of the year, however I have both a 5d3 and 7d2 and would like to know if the 70-200+TC would still be as good as the 100-400II on a crop sensor...

waynec
Автор

Never thought of doing that. Thanks for the video guys.

Neopulse
Автор

the one and only place I can get adequate unbiased reviews.... BTW what's that song playing? it's hauntingly beautiful

Studio-elxd
Автор

Great straight to the point no nonsense comparison of these lenses! This was the awesomest comparison guys!

jbravo
Автор

How much more sharpness would you get from the 400 prime?

willj
Автор

How about use with crop sensor on 70D and a Tamron 70-200 F2.8?

donavanzeh
Автор

Great review short and very efficient ....

KaoukabiJaouad
Автор

Great video. Thanks. Have you done a direct comparison between the canon 100-400 is and the new canon 100-400 is II? If so I haven't found it. Can you please post a link.

jasonpetty
Автор

Thanks guys. I have been debating on the same thing, teleconverter or not?
Can you guys do the same test with the new Sony G Master 70-200mm & G Master 100-400mm? And maybe comparing sharpness with these Canon lenses.

jbravo