Gin vs Gorilla Mux for API - Gin

[franciscokloganb]

gorilla/mux

❌ This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 9, 2022. It is now read-only. ❌

[roslanamir]

Thanks for the video. I have evaluated both and prefer Gorilla Mux. One thing you didn't mention is Gin is a full heavyweight Web framework while Gorilla Mux is a lightweight router. I don't need the full function of Gin for my app.

[aweakinsolastephen]

Gin really just makes more sense to me 😁

[lawrencejob]

Thanks for the video.

Fwiw to me, gin is more idiomatic — obeying function interfaces from the http package is more like a domain convention than a programming convention

Gin is idiomatic in the sense that it follows the principles of simplicity in go

Anyways thanks again

[justadude]

For me mux is closer to plain Go and that gives it more power

[acronproject]

Hello Do you know any source movie tutorial for this issue but implement it by Browser NOT POSTMAN ?

[mrizkimaulidan]

should I always set the header content type to application/json when using gorilla/mux?

[nanonkay]

Up next is Mux vs Gin vs Chi vs Fiber.

[acronproject]

I want Create Web Application and I should to see every changes in Browser Not Postman Program.

[brianpayne]

Do you have the source code for both?
I am curious as to which framework is faster by adding a timer for measuring the performance?
Thanks!

[thatonesnowboarde]

Hi, I would really like to see a Gin & Beego Tutorial on skillshare if you could make that happen I would be your first student ! They actually dont have many go tutorials on that service

[arkadiuszswioko]

Good comparision. But question is which has better performance?

[hamadrehman]

Gin makes it enviously simple to parse JSON. If i wasn't forcing myself to do things the hard way I would definitelyp refer Gin

[otaxhu]

a mi me gusta mas gorilla mux, ya estoy aconstumbrado a la sintaxis que trae por defecto go, lastima que gorilla web toolkit no tenga mas actualizaciones :(