Contextual Dating of Carolina Bays

preview_player
Показать описание
The elliptical geometry of the bays implies that they originated as inclined conical cavities or penetration funnels. The bays are radially oriented toward the Great Lakes. For this reason, the Glacier ice impact hypothesis proposes that the Carolina Bays were created by oblique impacts of glacier ice ejected by one or more extraterrestrial impacts on the Laurentide Ice Sheet. If this is true, the Carolina Bays formed contemporaneously. This episode discusses a method of dating the emplacement of the Carolina Bays using the geologic law of superposition and the established dates for the advance and retreat of the Laurentide Ice Sheet.

The Neglected Carolina Bays: Ubiquitous Geological Evidence of a Cataclysm.

Python programs for least squares fitting of ellipses.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thumbs up people, give support to Antonio and others who are beating the truth out of our ignorance of the past.

jollyroger
Автор

Looking back on this one, I think this is one of your best videos.

sgtrock
Автор

Good video. A few core samples of other raised rims giving similar "folded over" Statigraphic dating would be powerful evidence.

billymcnomates
Автор

Hey Antonio, thanks for the mention! Let's hope this really opens up a can of worms and gets people thinking outside the box.

AustinKoleCarlisle
Автор

When you showed how they allinged to the Nastapoka arc it all came together for me. Probably a shoemake-Levy style impact. Incredible how they all must have hit the ice and not a single one stuck hard frim land

VARVIS_
Автор

Good work gentlemen! The Nastapoka Arc and Belcher Islands are an unexplained geologic or geographic artifact of a relatively recent event, apparently an astrological impact. Thanks for casting light on this enigma.

thubensky
Автор

viscous relaxation. I'm always learning new terms from Antonio.

stig
Автор

Dr. Z, I'm a business owner, not an archeologist, but i find your work fascinating. Thank you for publishing in on an accessible platform.

Im in South Carolina many times a year, and each time I look at satellite shots (google maps) for bays that I might notice along the way.

VAspeed
Автор

Got your recent book as I’m a UT Geophysicist that has been following you from your first papers. You have had a lot of deniers as so many scientist have over time. Congratulation!
I have a lot of friends who live on or very near the Carolina lakes as I have lived here on the beach near Cape Fear for some time. I’ll try to get them to order your colored hardbacks! It’s fun to try and explain geology to them! Especially with meteors and ice bomes. Tech has really advanced. Love the tools that can time the layers in the lakes!

MontréalinSpring
Автор

I like your response to Dabblers Den re: Long Island bay dating. Well done.

psycotria
Автор

That appears to be consistent with recent analysis presented by Nick Zentner concerning wood fossils found in Seattle at different depths, about 15 kya and 14kya with respect to depths.

RobertMStahl
Автор

I imagine you see this as a very steep uphill battle but history will recognize the value of your work. Wondering, has any analysis been done to see if anomalous rock types are present in Carolina bays? It might not have been all ice. If rocks unique to the Michigan area are found in Carolina bays in Nebraska, the Carolinas, etc., that would be a big clue. Probably a naive and/or unoriginal idea but there you go.

patrickunderwood
Автор

I knew it! A couple years ago I did a deep dive into the Hudson Bay Area. Now there’s proof. There’s another area that is a probable impact point… the entire Arctic Sea Basin. Eventually the truth will come out. Big enough to change the tilt of Earth’s axis.

brandonmarquette
Автор

I look forward to your videos. Thank you sir.

Crazy_Terryy
Автор

Excellent. Thanks again for your research.

justmenotyou
Автор

I speculate the sarcophagi are thorium nuke reactor containment vessels. Heat sourcing for the chemical reaction chambers (King's chamber, queen's chamber, etc.) is from the vast thorium (uranium, gold, etc also) black sand reserves, kilometers thick, forming the Nile delta.

candui-
Автор

I would think extra attention should be paid to the outliers. Aren't we looking for anomalies?
Throwing out information that doesn't agree with your previous observations should lite a fire not create disdain.
This really helped me visualize the timing and made sense to me.
As far as those bays oriented farther north? Might we not expect that from all the debris flying there must have been some ricochet effects? Also how would the Shockwave from one impact effect the projectiles from another impact that had hit moments before and what would the deflection look like?
Just seems that they were all pointing to a similar origin.
Thanks!

scottowens
Автор

Great work Antonio. I think it would be good to look at human populations going from 20000 to 10000 ybp. I saw a map once on a Russell Carlson video showing lots of humans east of the Rockies before the YD boundary and nothing there until the end of the YD. That plus this current video are really squeezing out the possibility that the bays are older. I sure hope Cottrell comes to his senses about the many kinds of erosions impacting coastal bays and how that affects aging them. I fear he lost his way.

frogmtndoc
Автор

I speculate further the pyramids (pyrre-fire, mid-middle) of Egypt were constructed after meltwater pulse 1A, and before mwp1B.

candui-
Автор

How much does it cost to do bay rim core dates? It seems that a few dozen results all showing inverted stratigraphy with mid rim dates consistent with the age of the YDB impact would be extremely helpful.

frogmtndoc