Presenting ScienceClic English

Alessandro Roussel,

[pasijutaulietuviuesas]

This channel is an absolute diamond! So glad I found it!

[tastachurski]

From only one video from this channel, I've learned more about physics than for the past 4 years of physics in school... Thank you!

[Sinergmovies]

After years of watching sci channels. this is the first channel that made me understand physics. so glad i found it

[ovencake]

When this video gets several million more views let me say: "I was here."

[suppatedge]

Soundtrack reminds me of subnautica in some way. The content and animation quality of your vids blow me away tbh. Keep up the good work, i'll do my best to spread your channel around.

[Safrout]

طريقتك في تبسيط العلم جميلة جدّا.... واصل و ستكون قناتك من أشهر قنوات العلوم على اليوتيوب.

[haitamboukhairat]

Deserves more than 10 millions subscribers ...keep going 👌👌

[ovacumawyahwehst]

Every experiment she posts is an inspiration of exploration and lifelong learning.
Plus.. ❤Those dimples, her smile, laugh and brains are real medicine to the soul 😊❤
Tatiana, Neil, Michio and Brian together 📺 on a series ❤ 😴 💭 Binge worthy entertainment.

[SurajKumar-vbyu]

So glad i found this channel ...love from India

[jaysalbhatt]

You explained General Relativity to the novice better then anything out there. Most the time ppl just present the equation and explain all the symbols without going into concepts or exaples

[richardlinsley-hood]

1. We have the o1 frame, with the observer standing in the center/origin of the train1
2. We have the o2 frame, with the observer standing in the center/origin of the train2
3. We have the o3 frame or rest frame, with the observer standing in the center/origin and where both o1 and o2 are moving in opposite directions with speed v
4. In each of the 3 frames, at t=0, o1, o2 and o3 are crossing past each other
5. Train1 has front1 and tail1. Train2 has front2 and tail2
6. There are various points in the rest frame opposite front1, front2, tail1 and tail2 at t=0
7. Light from o1 and o2 will reach their respective front and tail at E2train1, E2train2, E3train1 and E3train2
8. The distances in the rest frame will be the same to E2train1 and E2train2 as will the distances in the rest frame to E3train1 and E3train2
9. The times in frame1 that E2train1 and E3train1 occur will be the same
10. The times in frame2 that E2train2 and E3train2 occur will be the same
11. The times in the rest frame that E2train1 and E2train2 occur will be the same
12. The times in the rest frame that E3train1 and E3train2 occur will be the same
13. Although there is a relative velocity between o1 and o2 as seen from o3 there are no differences in distance (8) or time (11, 12) to the events E2train1 and E2train2, E3train1 and E3train2 as seen from the rest frame
14. If m1 is the mass of train1 and m2 is the mass of train2 and are equal then m1=m2
15. The rest frame can be considered to be the same as a center-of-mass (COM) frame
16. If force F is applied to m1 in frame1 and force F is applied to m2 in frame2, the accelerations of m1 and m2 in the rest frame will be identical
17. In the rest frame, the clocks in frame1 and frame2 tick at the same rate.
18. Spacetime of E1 is ({d, +ve}, t) in frame1 and the spacetime of E2 is ({d, -ve}, t) in frame2.
19. Spacetime of E1 is ({d, +ve}, t) and the spacetime of E2 is ({d, -ve}, t), both in the rest frame
20. E2train1 and E3train1, E2train2 and E3train2 are examples of the paired events, E1 and E2, discussed above

[malai_barfi]

found you on reddit physics. so excited for this channel!

[RandomGuy-hijm]

Amazing channel, your visualizations are very good and content is awesome..

Please make more videos on quantum physics (also paradox related to quantum physics) ❤️❤️❤️

[iliketrainspwned]

Out of curiosity, why did you choose the name "ScienceClic English"? Do you plan on making future alternate channels for other languages? Or is it because of the way you managed to explain some of the most advanced frontiers of physics as easily and clearly as you can?

[blableu]

C'est génial que tu ais traduit tes vidéos pour atteindre une plus grande audience.

J'espère que cela a porté ses fruits, et que ça va continuer de l'être.

Bonne chance à toi.

Un abonné.

[the_sophile]

Could you tell which app you use for animation?

[ieBrazil]

Hey! I'm Brazilian translator interpreter and a guy interested in science and philosophy. My question, would you be interested in posting these videos in portuguese language? Have you thought of a Porthkuguese narration or titles? I've a small company and would love to do it.

[TheStarDreamer]

One of the best day of life, When you found this channel accidentally ✅
Keep Going, You have a Lot of Success ahead!👍

[gravitation-]

An apple on Earth can fall in one of two scenarios. The first scenario is when all celestial bodies are attracted and as a result, the apple actually falls. And the second scenario - all celestial bodies from each other repel as a result of all the same gravitational forces that push the apple to the Earth. The result is the same. There is only one formula. The formula matches completely. There are no differences. Moreover, looking at the sky, we can not even confidently say how things really are and what kind of version of gravitation really provided us with the fall of the apple. We can't say until we start doing calculations and experiments. And experiments and calculations just show that the fall of the apple is possible only according to the version of complex repulsion. On the direct gravity prescribed in all textbooks, the apple will not fall to the ground. On direct gravity, an apple can only fly into space far away. And that means what? Once again, most textbooks spell out the real lies. Several generations of students have been brought up on this lie.
How can this even be? And it's already happened. At first, in the view of theorists, the Earth was flat. And in those days, we wouldn't even be able to explain what a globe was. In response, we would hear: that the earth cannot be spherical, all the water would drain from it, and we ourselves would fall.
Then the Earth, in the view of theorists, stood in the center of the world. The orbits of the planets had the shape of curved loops. And no one wanted to make the world real. We could hear yes you what!. Science has reached unprecedented heights.The wheel has already been invented. We make sand chronometers.
If we now in the 21st century ask: Gentlemen theorists, are you okay with the theory? We will also have a lot of interesting answers. But isn't it really that great? The scheme works very simply. When there is a decent theoretical base available, we have the implementation of the theory in practice, that is, we have practical devices that work for a person. An example of an electrical engineer. There is a decent theory. As a result, we have power plants and electric motors, and lighting devices. Literally everything we have, from the iron to the TV, is a consequence of qualitative theory. Now let's see what we have in relation to gravity. Do we have an anti-gravity engine? We don't have . In fact, we are still exploring space through ancient Chinese jet propulsion.We have modernized it, brought it almost to perfection, but we still send high-tech firewood to the furnace. We are used to it, but the reality is that in the 21st century we can not burn anything, elementarily bring the body into orbit. Looking further: Do we have anything running on basic gravitational energy?. Is that anything? But it is free and permeates the entire universe. For example, do we have gravity power plants?

[Fanilo_Tv]

Hello, how are you? I have posted 3 of your videos. However, I would like to apologize and ask if you would grant me permission to post your videos if I include an intro, logo, channel redirect link, and all your network links in the video description and title. This is important to me, as I am from Uzbekistan and I would like to translate content that is useful for Uzbeks. Please give me your permission.