Q&A: Isaiah 9:16 and 7:14

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I revealed Myself to those who did not ask for Me; I was found by those who did not seek Me. To a nation that did not call on My 'Shúam' (Name), I said, 'Here am I, here am I.' - YaoshuaYÁOHU (Isaiah) 65:1.

yaohushuayaohu
Автор

Old Testament teaches that the Messiah would be God with us, Jesus claimed to be God, and history tells us He arose from the dead, but Muslims still don’t believe in Him. Sad

whychristianity
Автор

In Isaiah he is not just called God he is called everlasting father and the counselor why is this not mentioned

jamestweedy
Автор

This is such a stretch. How much evidence is enough for yall

josephs
Автор

Jesus Christ PBUH is a Servant of Allah 🤲🏽

choolaimedudude
Автор

🌎🙏🙏🙏 Thank God for the kingdom. Isaiah 9:6. Thank God I will always honor my marriage and family. Isaiah 54. Thank God for the Book of Isaiah. Thank you family. Thank God for another blessed opportunity.

AndreRosario-zmpf
Автор

First to speak on a verse of scripture in the Bible are Quran, one will need to interpret the scripture verse thoroughly, here the interpreter did not speak of the everlasting father a title Isaiah mention of in Isaiah 9:6. Neither did he speak of the Virgin Mary being a virgin and having child, how can a virgin have a child naturally speaking it’s impossible for man But with God it’s not, however the interpreter did make mention of the fact that the prophecy was seven hundred years before the child was born.

norvalmiller
Автор

Question-
You tie
Isaiah 9:6 with
Isaiah 7:14!
And talk as if it is just a name!? (Which is common in multiple nations)
But God himself will give a sign!!!
Behold a VIRGIN will be with child.

Signs like this happen rarely!!!
(Once) that’s how rare Jesus is.
And interesting is this is the only time God said “I” will give you a sign.

We His children and followers should pay Most of our attention on Him.

Food for thought!

carfixhelp
Автор

Isaiah 9 6 is a miss translation or wrong translation thats a child was already born. already past and already born talking about Hezekiah
its not referring to Jesus but rather it is referring to Hezekiah. In other words this passage is not a Messianic prophecy at all

TheAllForgiving
Автор

Very wise! Does anyone know where I can get more details on some of the questions he raised?

bjohnson
Автор

Jesus Christ my God and my Salvation...I will praise and boast your name my Lord YHWH ..The one True God from Genesis to Revelation!❤❤❤

carrilloomar
Автор

Im shocked in 2024 that people still dont know the difference between elohim and Elohim. Everyone anointed by Yhwh Are elohim. Only the Father ALONE is Elohim.
"I have said YE are elohim and are ALL sons of the Most High". Psalm 82:6.
Everyone regenerated by the Fathers Spirit are divine not Divine. We are all one with our Father by his spirit living in us. Its not a hard concept people to figure out. A small bit of critical thinking skills required not even a college education required.

jdaze
Автор

Very dishonest.
In what sense a normal young woman giving birth to a child would be a sign ?
What about Daniel 7:13-14 ? Read the entire chapter and try to lie about it too... I guess you can't hide this one!

brianplassan
Автор

My comments were made according to my freedom of speech, freedom of worship rights according to my Christian belief and faith. The comment about Netanyahu is a true fact about the observations of many people regarding ungodly behavior exposing itself!!!

cherylmburton
Автор

Mighty God - El Gibbor/Gibhor is used in Isaiah 10 referring to YHWH...

So kings are called EL Gibbor in those times? 🫣🫣🫣

deilnavarro
Автор

Also, isiah 6-11 is talking about hezacaiah, and his influence jn the defeat against the assyrian army that attacked jerusalem

riseofpotatonation
Автор

In original Hebrew which the Christians mistranslate the verse wonderful councillor mighty God is past tense and is about Hezakiah. Isaiah 53 is also past tense and is about Israel not Jesus. If Jesus was Devine he would be in Old Testament and worshipped by the prophets he is not.

Jam-drwt
Автор

Let's ignore The ALMIGHTY part. yeah nice try (g)ods and (G)od almighty are different.

imminent--strike
Автор

In Psalm 89:36-38 God speaks of establishing the Dynasty of David eternally, only in a symbolic way, and not with a physical throne with a human king on it on earth. Jesus always maintained that his kingdom was not of this world, but very often asserted himself as the Son of David when in human form. An earthly throne of God is also spoken of in the book of Revelation given to St John Apostle by our glorified Jesus, no longer in human form. Again, the throne is only spoken of symbolically! And in the book of Daniel the Prophet, the angel Gabriel told Daniel that in the time of the end that Satan would be so bold as to seat himself on it, and that is exactly what our glorified Jesus is saying in Revelation that Satan has done!!! Some people around the world today are viewing Netanyahu as having filled the position of Satan on the throne of God there in Israel/Palestine!

cherylmburton
Автор

I would add to this, that the translation from Tanakh (Jewish bible) is different, and makes more sense. Cuz it says that it is God who called him the Prince of Peace.
5For a child has been born to us, a son given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, called his name, "the prince of peace."

roxastidus