Hindu Succession (Amd.) Act, 2005 | Daughter made Coparcener | Notional Partition | Pious Obligation

preview_player
Показать описание
Xpert Law School is dedicated to students who are preparing for CLAT Entrance and are pursuing LAW.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is the best online Law class on YouTube. There is no doubt in this regard. Please do not discontinue your contribution to the needy people. 🙏

ebpdopj
Автор

Congratulations for your selection in uttrakhand judicial services 🎉

shaswatyadav
Автор

Your videos are easy to understand and we can makes even notes from what you have written, Thank You so much Ma’am 🙌🏻🙌🏻

kartikrathi
Автор

Respected Madam,
I being a law student, regularly watch your classes in YouTube and derive utmost satisfaction. My request in this regard is that I could not well understand regarding section 6 of succession Act-1956 .I would be thankful again if the same can be taught comprehensively.
With Regards,
Bipin Padhy.

bipinbiharipadhy
Автор

Thank you ma'am for giving such a wonderful lecture. You make even the most difficult topic easy.❤

Sunny-dg
Автор

Subject to correction, the type of Debt is not defined.

The provision only talks about the liability of the descendants (pious obligation) to discharge the debt.

rakeshdubey
Автор

It's given under Explanation of Section 6(5) and not in Section 6(3) by which a daughter cannot claim re-opening of partition done before 20 December 2004

gyaaneshwarjoshi
Автор

Thanks for making this important topic easier for law students. Thank maim plz making remaining sections also.

mohimam
Автор

ocassionally can you please move aside from thee board. it'll be easier to make notes. love your content . really helps as a law student

KhushiDatwani
Автор

Your teaching skills are really very expellant

RamSatrote
Автор

Wonderful Law content, Mam I need your suggetion about bequest/will.

PCBHANDARI
Автор

If daughter born on 1920, her both parents died before 1956 act. Will she applicable in act 1925 or she can claim ancestral property based on 2005 amendment.

samadarshikar
Автор

Hi Mam,

Need some suggestions on the 2005 amendment.
I have one use case of a civil case.

1. Father died in 1943
2. Mother died in 1922.
3. Daughter born in 1920 and died in 1997.

Will those daughter's son can claim ancestral property?

samadarshikar
Автор

Res.madam very good lecture. Please keep going on. Thanks

pratapraobhosale
Автор

Hi
1. Land Laws

2. Labour Laws

3. Intellectual Property Law

4. Insurance Law

Make videos

abhinav
Автор

really very helpful, thanks for these....

djaink
Автор

Please explain how the concept of survivorship has been abrogated by 2005 amendment

pandurangakg
Автор

Hello ma'am it's request regarding...you covered tha blackboard while teaching please...next time

shikhaojha
Автор

Is it as important to study for social welfare supervisor?

bhattmehnaza
Автор

Thanks a lot for this lecture .
There is confusion between How to decide about ancestral and self acquired property ?
Can you please explain that Ma'am ?
Thank you .

pk