The Christology of James (Part Two) | Live Q&A

preview_player
Показать описание
In this episode I will continue looking at what James says with respect to the divine identity of the Lord Jesus Christ.

_________________

To help with books related to future show topics and debates, here is a link to my Amazon page:

(HT: BreakfastGun)
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm really looking forward to the new Mark series! I benefited from the first series a few years ago, and was sorry when that came to a halt.

viviant
Автор

Oh I missed the live. This is surprsingly short. Thank you for the video. God bless you brother Tony.

BibleVerseDaily
Автор

As far as Not baptizing right away - I've heard the reason that this is to protect the congregation from those who want to make a show of Baptism and also to better "inform" the one wanting baptism of The Truth of the Death, Burial, Resurrection and New Life in Jesus Christ. But I agree with you Anthony Rogers - let's keep it simple. When they believe and declare - they should get baptized! And dunked! not sprinkled ;)

amoji
Автор

My family and some members of my church will be at the debate.

ParticularBaptist
Автор

Reverend Anthony Rogers, would you recommend that those who haven't gone through the previous Mark series go through it before you reboot that series?

alwaysgood
Автор

This is why I'm loving the KJV everyday more and more.

See how it renders KJV

My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.
James 2 : 1

alwaysgood
Автор

Waiting for Mark i have been studying Mark 14:61-63 : over 20 cross references to support Christ deity. supporting trinity.
there is no excuse fore oneness & unitarians

mariotriunegod
Автор

Euler Identity Crisis spends an hour just on Mark 1:1-2 and why he inserts Malachi before the Isaiah quote. And, yes, you're right it is profound.16:25

Seomus
Автор

2:31:38 - The Blessed Man….

“Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” (Luke 24:44)

“The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brothers⁠—it is to him you shall listen⁠—“ (Deuteronomy 18:15)

“This Book of the Law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success.”
(Joshua 1:8)


“but his delight is in the law of the LORD, and on his law he meditates day and night.” (Psalm 1:2)

TheLifeHeLives-HeLivesToGod
Автор

The KJV uses the term God and not Lord in James 3, when talking about the Father.

Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.
James 3 : 9

alwaysgood
Автор

Rev. @Anthony Rogers, let me play devil's advocate, regarding your statements about James not caring if you thought of Jesus or the Father as God or Lord, could a Modalist use this idea to promote their heresy? How would you rebutt this?

alwaysgood
Автор

Are you pronouncing "coup de grace" that way on purpose (like, for a joke), or do you not know the correct/typical pronunciation? I've heard you pronounce it that way twice now, and I'm just curious.

jabeavers
Автор

I’ve heard that James is writing against Paul and Galatians is an answer to James’ epistle. This drives division implying that what we don’t like about James is corrected by Paul..can you speak to this at all?

servyhwh
Автор

So no trinitarian believes the bible that Jesus is the SON of God . Fine settle for being wrong, those that practice falsehood will not enter God's kingdom!

dazzadizzy
visit shbcf.ru