The Pittsburgh Penguins 5-minute postgame with dan kingerski after the pens lose 4-3 in OT in Game 7

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Respect To The Penguins!.. Great Battle!.. Go Rangers✨

rubenowitzv.
Автор

First it was a great series and much respect to the Pens. The series turned for the Rangers when Lindgren came back. He’s our heart and soul on D. Now for the helmet issue, the rule says if the helmet is in the vicinity that the player can pick up the helmet and get back in the play. He didn’t see the helmet because he put his hands in the air to cry about no call. You are told as a kid to always keep playing and he didn’t. Don’t blame the ref and the rule when the player stopped playing because he either didn’t know the rule and took himself out of the play by complaining.

paulmatthews
Автор

In the end it evens out with bad calls. Game one and two call that benefitted the Penguins and put them ahead! In the end you were up 3-1 and let the NYR beat you.

patrickcpuc
Автор

Controversy? Give me a break! Nothing mentioned at the time. Intentionally ripped helmet off? That’s a stretch. Penguins lost because shesterkin kept rangers in game and then they capitalized on their opportunities. Penguins got plenty of calls that went their way including Guentzel’s goal that 9 out of 10 gets called a high stick because that’s what it was. Anyway penguins played strong game but were stymied by goalie who kept his team in the game. Great series.

hamburg
Автор

Facts are Penguins outplayed the Rangers but Good teams find a way to win the Penguins did not find the way Rangers did

vincentgrupposo
Автор

So that’s your How bout if the BS no goal against us we scored in game 1 had counted, this series would have been much different

Petebull
Автор

PENGUINS GOT ALMOST EVERY CALL ALL SERIES . They play on the edge and cry when it goes the other way. Straight punches to the face after the whistle but the Rangers get caught for retaliating, then penguins score. Now the helmet thing doesnt go their way and here are the water works. GET OVER IT. Also Kakkos goal was a good goal. Rangers won 5 games this series.
LFG

mr.horvath
Автор

Yes, you somehow still loss....despite the folks in Toronto

williame.donnelly
Автор

Here's what there is no debate about...the Penguins are whiney babies.

mitchk
Автор

You can't complain about calls or non calls. Panerin and Zubenajad have heads and Penguins players have elbows and shoulders. But the Pens never took advantage of this simple truth. If you are not as quick and dominant skill wise as you used to be, you had better learn to find an advantage another way.

skippy
Автор

Your helmet take is heavily exaggerated. I know it’s still fresh and the loss hurts but call it as it was. They were caught up behind the net as all watch and see constantly. His arm did wrap around during the scrum but to say he intentionally took the helmet off there is a huge stretch. They were letting them play at that point in the game and they didn’t call holding. Probably better to Emphasize that could or should have been holding instead of he intentionally took his helmet off. Come off just as salty as Sullivan.

brodssn
Автор

Jarry was wayyyy too deep in his net on last goal...that's a real problem for him at times

med
Автор

you such bs artist. You forget to mention pens dominated in all the controversial calls that toronto tried to help you win, game 1 ur D pushed our guy into ur goalie, 100% it's a goal, tonight's high-stick goal should be disallowed. The Lafrenière pulling the helmet off was another dirty play on your Pens that backfired. It was away from the play and refs aren't watching, ur D interfere with Lafrenière by pushing him into the net, Lafrenière grab on and helmet came off as both wrestled onto the ice. If there's a penalty it should on ur D for interference, Lafrenière didn't the puck. Not to mention that whole series there's so many non-call on grabbing and interference on Panarin.

jwaynes
Автор

Controversy are you serious? I guess we're not gonna discuss gm 1 bs no goal which was a goal and last night's high stick goal no controversy there hey, if you look closely the ref had his back turned during that play with the helmet, and 4 a team that has been getting pure nhl love by the refs for 1 of the most whining clubs in sports you all need to zip your lips the PENS had a 3-1 lead and couldn't close it out that's what needs to be discussed the PENS got every call review go there way maybe it's true what they say KARMA IS A BITCH, have fun on the links

victorfalz
Автор

The rangers won game 1 in regulation, everyone saw the Pitt D man push Kakko into their goalie....yet the goal gets over turned which means there was conclusive evidence???? We lose in 3x NO ranger crying, they go out and win game 2. Guentzel's tap in again goes in Pitt's favor...clearly his stick was shoulder height...video proves it....but they decide to let that call stand. Pitt had so many more power plays all series....every review went to old Pitt teams would put teams away....Mario, Jagr....if they had 2 goal leads, they buried the 3rd goal to ice it. This Pitt team could not finish us off, no killer instinct....that is why you lost.

michaelhowley