(Mathematical Induction) - Proof a set with N elements has 2^N Subsets

preview_player
Показать описание
Jesus Christ is NOT white. Jesus Christ CANNOT be white, it is a matter of biblical evidence. Jesus said don't image worship. Beyond this, images of white Jesus are not just blasphemous and criminal, white Jesus is from Satan ( the imposter.) Why? Let's look at what Satan does:
1) He is incredibly narcissistic and promotes himself shamelessly.
2) He misleads and confuses.
3) He pushes people away from Jesus Christ God, the Holy Trinity, the one and only messiah. White Jesus does all three of the above and more -- matching the ways of Satan.

Statues of Christ are equally offensive to God the Christ. While money is the biggest idol, Jesus spoke sufficiently against carved images.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can also find me on Tik Tok @reuslovesmath and @polarpiny

In this video, I show you how to use induction to prove that a set with N elements has 2^N subsets. This is a really neat proof and if you leave out the null set, you can do a similar proof showing that a set with N elements has (2^N)-1 Subsets.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

i understand everything except when he puts 2^k+2^k+1-1=2^(k+1) ?

batoulalsayyed
Автор

Thank you so much for the detail explanation

Rutika
Автор

3:02 see that portion above these words case k+1
There are subsets with k-1 elements and k elements you habe repated a1 in them twice. Can you please explain?

Rsingh
Автор

What about single ton set like {A1}, {A2}....{ak} these also not repeating just like empty set then why 2power k minus one

sridurganelapati
Автор

still i didn't understand the logic of proving it unfortunately :(

kiraivanova
Автор

This is very low quality. Typos on the screen ruin the proof( a1 repeated multiple times), and the verbal explanation is "yeah, uh-huh, alright alright, okay okay, like, um, additionally, this guy, and so on, you get it, right?" This is not an "explanation" of the proof. When extemporaneous speech isn't your strength, it is best to prepare a script, and then read it.

adamkinsey