How to Interpret a Chest X-Ray (Lesson 10 - Self Assessment): Part 1

A self-assessment of how much material was learned and retained from this course on interpreting chest x-rays, and how well it can be incorporated into the viewer's preexisting clinical knowledge.

[StrongMed]

Florian Faehling Thanks for the feedback and for watching!  In case 3, the left upper lung zone looks more black because that's essentially the only relatively normal lung the patient has.  In other words, the non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema secondary to ARDS is impacting all of the rest of the lungs except for that one part.  Why is the LUL spared in this particular case?  I have no idea, and there probably isn't any specific reason.

[travishughes]

These videos were extremely helpful. I appreciate the systematic quality to your lectures. Referencing the previous lectures and inserting the tables within this video was impressive as well. Well done!

[aci.]

Thank you Sir for the effort you put into these videos. They're very informative and filled with must-know vignettes. Hope you could release tutorials for CT as well. Thanks again!

[ashbinlamsal]

Billion of thanks. Your video lectures helped a lot and make those finding clear in short interval of time.

[heinhtet]

you are amazing! love your lecture series.

[baidyanathpurbey]

inerpret a chext x-ray series is a great review, Thanks a lot to Dr Eric Strong for your excellent presentation, this will be your precious contribution to mankind.I am a radiologigt but i will go through all your you tube video. once again i thanks.

[janecovington]

FNP student here. Thank you so much for all of your videos. I am pretty sure you have helped me to grasp several challenging topics and have helped me do well in my first semester. You're videos are so organized and easy to follow. Thanks again for sharing your knowledge. I was also looking for CT/MRI/abdominal x-ray video and hope to see one in the future! Thank you for the great chest series!

[mathesondaniel]

Superb course, thank you. (year 2 MD student Australia)

[anmarsaad]

Thank u so much.. You did me a great favor.

[honestyudukomose]

love love love all you lectures, they have helped a lot. really appreciate the time and effort utilized in making this videos. 
am also well supportive of your future plans for CTs. God bless. student[ukraine]

[constance]

Great videos Dr!
Could you please do one on abdominal x rays? Thanks in advance

[hscamzhscam]

Dr. Strong, this is an awesome series.The info is well organised and easy to understand. I´ll definately recommend to my junior doc collegues. Re Case 8: besides the broken pacemaker and rresulting bradycardia, are there bilateral hazy opacities the lung fields as well? (ie from associated cardiogenic oedema)? Thank you in adv.

[sadmanjaoad]

Nobody explains a topic the way you do. You make everything so clear by giving examples og everything. Would be great if you could make series on CT chest and abdomen.

[ujule]

Amazing lectures...  I have a doubt, in the last case of this video,   when i reached the F (from the ABCDF method), It looks like the patient has an interstitial difusse pattern in both lungs. Am I right? Maybe I´m just too paranoid...

[ajaiarora]

Please explain difference between PA view and AP view in details . Thanks !

[florianfaehling]

Hey Eric, thank you so so much for all your videos, your teaching style is incredible and I have learned more from your chest x ray videos than in all of my medical course so far. 

A quick question to case 3, the IV drug abuse in the ER:what causes the increased transparency in the left upper lung zone right above the flexible tube? Is that just an artifact or idnt the effusion spread there?

Thank you so much again, I am eagerly awaiting your new videos :-)

[Connakal]

I LOVE YOUR LECTURES. Thank you so much! I'm taking my radiology exam on Monday and you are the greatest revision! 
Greetings from a medical student from Greece :)

P.S. Do you have any xrays/ cts from systems other than chest? Thanks a lot again

[nishoo]

dr. Strong, is there tracheal deviation in case 7?