80 Scrum Master Exam Questions - Prepare for CSM, PSM, ACP Exams!

---

My Tech Stack:

My links:

About me 👋🏼

Hi, I'm Helena, founder of Product Camps and ExamsPM. My goal is to help businesses enhance their efficiency and effectiveness through AI, automations, and project management. I want to help you turn AI from a novelty into a time saving tool, and become an AI-driven leader.

#scrummaster #psm #csm #acp

[funfinds]

Question 34: Scrum team is usually between 3-9 people

Great resource. Thank you!

[AbhishekSingh-pnc]

Thank you for the PDF. It is great help!

[Confucius-ff]

Q20: option d). If PO put the requirements from "important executives"=stakeholders into the backlog, does'nt it mean that Scrum team can manage such ad-hoc high priority requrements?

[jhilmilmukherjee]

Thank you Sir/Mam. It was very helpful. I'm now ready for my regd scrum master. Regards

[ggnmodi]

Thanks for the questions it will surely helpful

[JanEichner]

56) Improvements from the Sprint Retrospective can become PBIs and therefore get selected into the Sprint Backlog? Can't they?

[MAB-rbcr]

Q68 according to your video on the sprint burn down chart, days are on the X-axis, however when I google sprint burn down chart all the outcomes show days on the Y-axis on the bottom. Can you confirm what is the right answer?

[piyushchaudhari]

Thanks you very much..this is very very helpful :)

[ncrosdale]

hi, the link is not working for me to download the questions

[Quana_]

Some of these questions are not in the scrum guide. Am I missing something?

[ushavicky]

hey i am unable to access the pdf can you reupload it?

[youreinsample]

32: developer is not a role, developerS is.

[d.a.]

Question 48's suggested answer makes no sense, and my assertion is supported by the suggested answer to the very following question 49. According to the "immutable" Scrum Guide, "the purpose" of the Review is for developers AND stakeholders to inspect the increment. How can that happen if stakeholders are not required to be there? The Guide continues to set forth that the Sprint Review is a "working session and the Scrum team should avoid limiting it to a presentation", which is basically saying it's two-way, collaborative, between the team and the stakeholders. Without their feedback, what's the point of the Review at all?

Again, referring to the Scrum Guide, "if Product Backlog item does not meet the Definition of Done, it cannot be released OR EVEN PRESENTED AT THE Sprint Review." Since the Developers knew, going into the Review, that they had an Increment to present because they'd have confirmed it met the Definition of Done, there's nothing to gained or learned from going into a Review by themselves. And, low and behold, in question 49, stakeholders are among the applicable answers, along with the owner and developers, in participating in the inspection. Which is correct. So there's no way they cannot be required to show up at the Review.

Many people have recommended not trying to memorize answers to questions, but to use one's own reasonable application of the mindset and lightweight framework. So, I'd absolutely answer a question like this consistent with what I'm understanding of the Scrum Guide, and if it ends up being marked wrong, I'm going to be ticked off.

[preetkanwarsingh]

39. Is scrum master a Management Position? one of the CSM trainers specifically said they are not.

[muradjam]

can the CSM exam contain some (all) of the questions in the video ?

[nikkoracela]

In question 48, should the Sprint Review include Stakeholders? They're the ones to inspect correct?

[andriyun]

Thank you for the really good video. However, I can not understand the answer to question 49. Scrumguide has nothing about Stakeholders ability to perform inspection of scrum events.

[silviaivanova]

Q12 there are no roles, but accountabilities! Link in bio doesn't work to download the questions.

[EbunBabalola]

Please is anyone able to download the pdf.
Tried several times but could not

[Magique]

Is this similar to the format of the test?