The US just used a stealth bomber to sink a ship in the Pacific

preview_player
Показать описание
During a massive series of Maritime wargames called RIMPAC 2024 held earlier this month, a U.S. Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bomber demonstrated a new relatively low-cost — but extremely effective — means of engaging even large enemy warships dubbed QUICKSINK.

This weapon, which could be thought of as an anti-ship JDAM, has significant implications for the future of naval warfare, so let's talk about it.

📱 Follow Sandboxx News on social

📱 Follow Alex Hollings on social

Citations:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Quick sink sounds like something a novice would buy at Home Depot.

PasleyAviationPhotography
Автор

As a former sailor, that thing is terror-effing-fying.

wesr
Автор

I am shocked, an actually affordable weapon which isn't 5x the cost of the target.

GainingDespair
Автор

And the B-2 Spirit can carry about 16 of those bombs....yikes!!!!

certainthings
Автор

RIP Tarawa. From hosting Harriers (the first jet to go fighter ace since Vietnam) to being a practice target... :(

maotseovich
Автор

It is designed to blow under the keel. Just below the waterline would fail to overcome the compartmentalization used by ships to prevent damage from the hull from sinking the ship. A blast under the ship keel breaks the ship in half, simultaneously lifting it and allowing the slap of water refilling the bubble created by the blast to effectively slap the ship apart.

brettlaw
Автор

I literally just thought “I wanna see a B2 vs a Chinese navy vessel”, Alex Hollings runs the simulation confirmed

zakwalls
Автор

Quick Sink: It does what it says on the tin™️

mikestewart
Автор

Just imagine once these weapons are utilized by B-21s instead of B-2s

degenerateactual
Автор

It’s a bargain except for the $2.13 Billion stealth bomber.

Wilhuf
Автор

Learning of these successful weapons tests make me feel much more secure.
Thank you Sandboxx!

weyeswonder
Автор

Not only B-2 capable. F-18, F-35, B-1, F-15E can all carry a 2000lb JDAM.

Mark-BS-YT-name
Автор

I think he got the effects of the NSM and LRASM mixed up. LRASM has a 1, 000 ib warhead while the NSM has a much smaller warhead.

ARandomCustodian
Автор

Don't forget that the Tarawa class was only about 50 feet shorter than W.W. II Essex class aircraft carriers (40-ish if compared to the early Essexes).

pauld
Автор

Wow, I was once a Marine on LHA-1! Spent time after the flood on Camp Pendleton living and working on the Tarawa. I am a little sad to see her sunk.

ShopDog-Garage
Автор

So it means that a Quick sink guided bomb with electronic warfare munitions and aircrafts can be used to quickly takeout a hugely expensive ship...
Its like fpv drones and tanks.

srijonmondal
Автор

Navy doesn't play too often with 2000lb GBU...however with the Quicksink kit available, this add's a nice, inexpensive tool to erase a surface target.

corsair
Автор

Imagine using anti-ship missiles along with this capability. While the battle group is busy engaging a surface level attack, a stealth bomber cruises overhead and drops a load of these munitions, one for every ship.

markenda
Автор

I will miss the Tarawa, i was on her i 1979 on a west pac deployment, i was golf company 2/3. She was a very nice ship.

mikerice
Автор

Good to see the gang back together. Hope that demonstration sends a strong message to our lesser friendly neighbors across the pond.

TheComputerCowboy