Why doctors are concerned about the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine

preview_player
Показать описание


Turn to CNBC TV for the latest stock market news and analysis. From market futures to live price updates CNBC is the leader in business news worldwide.

Connect with CNBC News Online

For info on the best credit cards go to CNBC Select:

#CNBC
#CNBCTV
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

You mean American Drug Companies are worried about a compeditor taking some of their profit

philipdear
Автор

I am from the UK me, my parents my friends we all have had the same vaccine (AstraZeneca ) we all are absolutely doing well on it I think American's drug factories are more worried for their profit than their citizens

-Hooman-
Автор

Editorially reprehensible title to this video. He explicitly did not say that experts are specifically worried about the Oxford vaccine.

georgeholloway
Автор

79 people had suffered rare blood clots after vaccination - 19 of whom had died in UK

chrisbenton
Автор

We the citizens should demand congress test it first

richie
Автор

Matt Herpper is not a doctor. Why did they interview him? Why do we have to listen to this guy?

larrybu
Автор

I had Oxford i am fine no problems at all .2 week still ok

ross
Автор

More politicians and media people are turning into scientist and doctors, interesting.

BY-sfdn
Автор

I wouldn't believe this guy about anything, ever.

dankarp
Автор

Who is Matt Herper? He has a bachelor's and a master's in science, but he is not really an independent expert. Another example of journalists interviewing other journalists. Is there an ethical problem with journalists becoming the persons generating the news and becoming the news. He just does not sound like an independent expert. He sounds like someone who read a lot of Google News articles.

Grapevine
Автор

The expert they had on this show needs to keep up with the latest study.

ptu
Автор

HCQ did not work because the dose was too high and given too late in the illness, that's why people died of heart arythmia. If they had gotten a loading dose of 400mg and maintenance 200mg early in the disease then they would have lived. All the people in Africa who are on low dose HCQ for malaria have been protected from serious corona.

rosalinaayala
Автор

Because it’s not American they will say anything

kristaylor
Автор

Disgraceful and at best disingenuous reporting by the male interviewer. His comments were border line stupid and very poorly informed. Either he or the researchers who set these questions need either proper scientific advice or to shut up.

mikedee
Автор

Stop inviting pseudo Professors. REAL ONES ARE AT WORK

antigaid
Автор

Hold on this warning ⚠️ 8 months ago???

thinker
Автор

Can someone please tell the guest his inner alien is looking out of his eyebrows?

david.juillet
Автор

Let trump try it first then McConnell, then Lindsey Graham and all the trumps

RWildekrav
Автор

40% effective can also be 80% dangerous as far as unintended dangerous side effects. Listening to scientists and researchers, not politicians or pundits.

bkanegson
Автор

Obviously this individual is having difficulty with TDS. Two studies just came out from European countries that show good benefit with HDQ. Also, one of the studies that was used to say it didn't benefit patients was on those that were critically ill, the doctors around the world that were using this have all said once the patient is critical HDQ was of no benefit. What makes it so bad is one of the studies that has been used to say HDQ did not work gave these very ill patients toxic doses of HDQ. One doctor commented that they wanted to make sure the study did not show any benefit.

edg