Cross Bracing vs. Chevron Bracing

preview_player
Показать описание
Watch this video to learn:
The importance of bracing in steel structure,
what is cross or x bracing,
what is chevron bracing,
how force is transferred through chevron bracing,
how force is transferred through chevron bracing,
advantage and disadvantage of chevron bracing.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Very nice and intuitive explanation brother. Well, I had a question for you. I would be grateful if you please answer- @08:55 you said a vertical downward component will cause more bending to the horizontal beam and that's why you preferred the X- bracing over chevron bracing. But please notice, I can see 2 advantages of chevron over X. These are:
1) in case of X bracing the beam is long and there is no support/joint like chevron in between- which increases the clear span length vs width i.e. slenderness of the beam and more slenderness contributes to more buckling! On the other hand, in chevron, the beam's clear span length is significantly shortened due to the support joint at the middle, and there is less buckling I guess.
2) @08:55 as you said about the vertical downward component faced by the beam in chevron bracing which I think is correct. But at the same, the vertical downward component is countered by the other diagonal in chevron bracing! So the bending effect is again reduced by this mechanism. Here also in my opinion the Chevron wins.😊 So please consider my question and we'll be happy if you share your feedback regarding this. Thank you.❤

fahimahmedbhuiyan
Автор

thanks a lot in x direction why load p did not go to colum directly its also short path like the horizontal section, is it deal with stiffness i mean colum size is more than horizontal section if that correct why we dont put the bracing in the first bay to go directly to the first colum . in charvon bracing load p go to horizontal then to node which have shape ^ why he go to one incline direction why its not going to both incline direction .

himodesweet
Автор

Nice subject. I only think you're taking the wrong path by taking the directions of the forces applied. Only the members that can take pulling forces can play a role since all compression beams tend to buckle. So the directions of the forces should be along the other trace.

geerthenkwijnants
Автор

Hello Tanmoy...Nice subject
Actually I am getting refresh, watching these videos..the subject I left almost 10-12 years back..

However I remember one unresolvable question, if you can put your though on this
In Azarbizan, the Temperature is very extreme, very hot as well, very cold..and with this situation which kind of bracings are most suitable for steel structure for transmitting lateral forces.

Appreciate your work. All the best.

subhashbiswas
Автор

How do we calculate the length of the brace in x Bracing

thatguyFS
Автор

What happens if I made a Chevron Bracing for lower half of the building and X-Bracing for the upperhalf? I'm just wondering what if adding every truss structure with no physical or mathmetic consideration. The more, the better?

SHLee
Автор

What do you mean by “least” path? It’s not that clear to me. Thanks

dv
Автор

Hi Tonmoy, do you have a website/social media profile/contact where we could reach you on directly for professional/coaching purposes?

YaraCrix
Автор

Hi sir, Can you explain the effective length parmetres lx, ly, lz parmetres of truss member?

abishak