Will AI Kill Art? 🤖

Does AI deserve to be called an artist? What exactly do we consider a “masterpiece”? In this video, we'll explore the impact of AI on the creative field and discuss the implications of its growing influence.

JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
📩 Get your regular dose of culture directly in your inbox

JOIN OUR FREE 5-DAY EMAIL CHALLENGE
💪 Boost Your Soft Skills with Art

CREDITS:
Music: YouTube Audio Library
Production: IK Video Production

STAY IN TOUCH:

If you’d like to support us you can now do so by joining our channel. Your membership means we can keep this project running and continue to share knowledge with more curious muses. Thank you for your help!

[Toogoodtobetrue]

If anything it’ll raise the value of human art

[Japanican]

In the 1960s, after the invention of the Moog synthesizer, there was some worries of the synthesizer replacing all musical instrument and even musicians. This fear grew until the 80s and then just faded. Over 4 decades later, people still make music with conventional instruments; even reviving old instruments (like the mandolin & the harpsichord). And people to this day are still paying to see musicians play theses instrument. The synthesizer never replaced anyone or anything; only supplemented. So I don't believe artists & art lovers need fear anyone or anything being replaced by AI art.

[m-e-l-t]

Humans have been painting/creating art since we lived in caves. The oldest cave painting is appx. 64, 000 years old. Thousands of years has passed, countless tech innovations have been created from printmaking to photography to computer software... yet humans are still painting and creating art.

[Catlily]

No, AI won't replace art because rich people will still want something unique and can pay for something not made by a machine.

[husamali]

No, Ai doesn’t have the human spirit or their unique life experiences. It just copies from humans.

[Jhihmoac]

IDK... I am a digital artist, and I still like doing everything _"Old School, "_ such as starting from scratch, shaping everything piece by piece, layer for layer, and then doing the perspective layout (if any), then finally the lighting/texturing effects... Most don't go for that because of the work involved... They want just a couple of "pull points", enter in a few number values, and everything is complete after that!

[Rusu]

I think it will be the same as a movie vs. theater competition. AI will definitely kill art, but in what sense? Did a movie kill a theater? Well, no, but actually yes.

[artistpoet]

AI is pushing the legislation around art ownership more than it is pushing the medium or what it is to be an artist. AI, Photo Editors and Cameras are all tools. Collage artists use clippings from magazines. Are they just crafters or artists? Do they have a claim on the resulting work or should they credit the creators and owners of the pieces they clipped up and pasted together?

Here's my final take: The more we automate the more value there is to the hand made. Think about the meal you last ate at a quality restaurant then contrast it with the last time you had a genuine, quality, home cooked meal made just for you and then compare them both to a fast food lunch you grabbed between classes or on your work break. There is value in each and a place for them all in our society but I'm sure most reading this will pine for that home cooked meal that their nana would make just for them.

Love you, Nana.

[deltatango]

Did you write the script for this video using AI? 😂😜

[AlwaysfitnessInternational]

Art you buy is art you like, all art is you. It’s the mirror image of your like

[timriehl]

I'm not rich. I buy from local artists. Human ones. And I would boycott any museum that displayed AI "art".

[dkstudioart]

All I can say is my art sales dropped to near zero once Midjourney and Dall-E became widely used. I can't say for sure that AI alone caused my sales to crash to nothing but it must have been a factor. I used to sell paintings every month, this year I've sold two. I've come to the conclusion that art is now only a hobby, nothing wrong with that I guess but I have a hard time being motivated to make art solely for myself, maybe that's a sign I'm not really an artist anyway.

[iseeu-fppo]

So fucking ironic that this video is voiced by AI and no one got it.

[opwave]

You asked the important question up front: how can we tell the difference between art and junk when we don’t even know what art is? Current society has strayed so far away from art that it’s no longer taught in some schools. There’s less of an appreciation for it compared to things that are logical algorithmic, formulaic, and conforming. Btw that’s what AI does. Take input and spit it right back at us. Fulfilling expectations, solving an equation or following formulas. No matter what the AI peeps tell you, there’s nothing truly creative about AI art. And since we as a society don’t value art like our ancestors did, a lot of us would favor the “style” of AI art over human art. So if you want to change that, teach more art in school.

[Heisenburg]

I mean referencing photography is not cheap and referencing modern artists is unethical, but refurbished ai art seems more chill to use

[juostudios]

I fucking like Ai it helps a lot with lot of things related to concept and design, then here you are the artist to decide what fit your picture or not

[khanimraneme]

AI is reproduction of man made old stuff but it will boost the value of original art work. Being an artist I'm not against any form of art like NFT or digital art but there is a room for everyone working in any field of life.

[VanInhalin]

Cattle Decapitation : Scourge of the Offspring is an AI music video

[noras.]

Did you see the last Years if Bienale of Venice? Did you see recently some Galleries from New York or other cities? Garbige!

[asgads]

the coypright is an issue but not so the result. no reason to call this not art. just has to be clear that the art in that case is AI generated and also how to follow routines established by humans