Google's Porat on the US-China AI Race

preview_player
Показать описание
Alphabet and Google President and Chief Investment Officer Ruth Porat said the US is one year-plus ahead of China in AI models, but cautioned this lead is not to be taken for granted. Porat said working with the Trump administration on a bold and responsible regulatory framework will play a critical role in the AI race in a conversation with Bloomberg's Erik Schatzker at Bloomberg House in Davos.
--------
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Well if you look back in the last 30 years, the Chinese did not invent many things like EVs, drones, robodogs, high speed trains, subways, mobiles, many electronics, GPS, 6G, stealth, hypersonic ICBMs, etc. But they have taken it to the next level and the adoption is vast due to their manufacturing might, tooling engineering, mass production expertise etc.
They are bigger than the next 8 combined for a reason. They adopt, refine, improve, bring to mkt way faster than anyone else. Just look at their EV development time is less than 1/2 of Western automakers and the software in their EVs is way superior than ICE automakers.
That tells you a lot.

robertwang
Автор

Really impressed with Ruth's answers. Often you catch these videos of really high profile executives who do not seem very knowledgeable of their own products; I say this as someone that follows a lot of Google Blogs and all the news coming out of Google.

I'm also happy that during her time as CFO she did not kill the Pixel phone program, I used Fine phones since the Galaxy Nexus.

The one product she could have given a little more time is Google Stadia. The technology was great, I think what hurt them with the hardcore gamers was the pricing model.

LeeWoods
Автор

Not impressed with the guy asking questions. He seems to be way out of his depth. Just some random business schmuck without any technical interest.

And an actual conversation about the China-US AI race would have been a lot more interesting -- which probably would have been best with an engineer and not a CIO.

cacogenicist
Автор

Just one year-plus ahead? I thought she was going to say the US was 10 years ahead

sagittariusann
Автор

China's DeepSeek R1 is on par with 01 now, she clearly not informed.

sneakymove
Автор

Marc Porat from General Magic is my hero!

ar-futurist
Автор

Hasn't she heard of DeepSeek? China is way ahead in models.

dfv
Автор

Those boots don't match what's upstairs.

rwgamer
Автор

As an IT professional for 30+ years I have real concerns around the lack of controls governments are placing around the development and use of AI. This needs to be a concerted effort at a whole of country level the benefits and negatives noted and investigated in depth and the appropriate safety measure put in place.

troophq
Автор

Look at the ridiculous boots on this overpaid goober 🤣

_Safety_Third_
Автор

The interviewer seems is so obviously fishing for some sort of condemnation of Musk from Ruth... and she’s not falling for it. Typical media.

KsazDFW
Автор

바둑의 승부는 반드시 바둑판 위에서 결정될 필요는 없고, 마치 비행기가 활주로 위에서만 착륙할 필요가 없는 것과 같습니다.

zdlily
Автор

Look. You could fix healthcare way easier than by deploying AI. Just outlaw for-profit healthcare. But that will never happen or be proposed at Davos, let's face it. But, it infuriates me when these rich people look at healthcare and act perplexed like "wow, it's so hard and so expensive." It doesn't need to be.

briancase
Автор

She seems like a good representation of Google

Lululemon
Автор

The interviewer seems to be fishing for some sort of condemnation of Musk here…. Typical media.

KsazDFW
Автор

This interviewer needs a different career path. CIO Porat is so knowledgeable. A good interviewer could have gleaned so much more.

Craig-EWI
Автор

Google the predictions from 5 years ago . China is always the boogie man but theres more than a trillion dollars of AI value that has grown in the US in that time...

DavidPat
Автор

such awful questions...the journalist tries to picture Trump as the absolute evil and asks stupid questions. no real interest in AI...

breaktherules
Автор

any disease which is carried in blood cannot be assesd otherwise, like diabetic it has to have a blood drop to be assesed

MalvinderKaur-ex
Автор

Google is nice and i always have said that because they have certain way of doing things and have assembled certain very very good points like knowledge information GPS you tube of course they were given plenty of resources means monies to do that they did it very well that is what i mean when given resources it is used well. not all "Gadhe' do that.i like the way they painstakingly carry on gathering information and that is needed for lot of new programs to be made which are good for human beings complete make over of certain new things.

MalvinderKaur-ex
join shbcf.ru