Fluid Mechanics: Topic 10.5 - Kinematics of fluid elements (shear strain, rotation, and vorticity)

preview_player
Показать описание
Note: Some fluid mechanics textbooks omit the 1/2 in the shear strain rate expression. That is, the shear strain rate is defined simply as [ d(alpha)/dt + d(beta)/dt ]. We keep the 1/2, as in Dr. Frank White's textbook, "Viscous Fluid Flow".

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Why do professors not teach like this? Everything is visual and it gives you an intuitive sense where the derivations are coming from. As a result it makes you ten times more invested in what you're learning.

carbon
Автор

Absolutely great!!! In a regular class, teachers do not tend to explain like this, I mean, in a detailed way. Thank you much for your time and effort and sharing knowledge worldwide. Greetings from Perú 🇵🇪

jdtaramona
Автор

Whenever I find your your video on any topic i feel glad and rest assured that i will surely get it from this.

ashutoshkumar
Автор

Very well illustrated and neatly explained. This is the way to teach! Looking forward to more videos from you

KJ-oqxr
Автор

Hey thank you so much, We watched this video in transport phenomena class. We really appreciate all your explanations.

luiscarlospradanino
Автор

Thanks a lot for this video it's very easy to understand the derivation here rather than in direct text books

shwethakc
Автор

Man this also explained elasticity for me. Two birds with one shoot. Thank you

azadalmasov
Автор

Thanks a lot! I finally understood what I've questioned for at least two years :0

hwlzruk
Автор

I cannot thank you enough for this video. I had a lot of trouble understanding this, but know I got it!

christianvalencianarva
Автор

Another question: when doing this derivation we are reliant on the fact that the clockwise direction gives us -dB/dt. Wouldn't this make the (later in the video) full body rotation become Omega = - (dv/dx+du/dy)/2, i.e. giving two minus signs?

Yoyimbo
Автор

Just one question. Why in the shear strain rate is the mean sum of velocity gradients while in the angular velocity is the mean difference?

jdtaramona
Автор

Please explain more that how did you apply the Taylor series approximation as you said ?..

xiangchamling
Автор

Very nice video, but the most tricky part to me is not explained: why are the distances moved by A and B respectively given by (dv/dx)dxdt and (du/dy)dydt?

Yoyimbo
Автор

it's awesome video!!
but i have a question!!
when explain angular velocity
why do a and b rotate different way?
i think that picture means shear strain, not rotation

uponxbo
Автор

shouldn't the shear strain rate be the change in the angle between two sides that were originally perpendicular? Why is there a 1/2 term in front of the shear strain rate?

rockhopper
Автор

Is it a control mass or control volume analysis?

truedhonifan
Автор

last tutorial you said incompressible flow doesn't undergo expansion or contraction, but you say opposite in this video

hp-hnzo
Автор

In 2:21 you have to explain how the taylor series gives you the parcial derivative. This is critical. Other than that is a very nice video.

jrsa
Автор

Why are we interested in the average angular rotation and not the instantaneous rotation?

lq_
Автор

No prove of how we derived omega x and y

desmondselasi