MULTI-GRAMMY WINNING MASTERING VS @MusikHack MASTER PLAN 1.5 UPDATE | RADIUM POW!

preview_player
Показать описание
Can Musik Hack's Master Plan 1.5 update get anywhere close to a multi-Grammy winning/ multi-Platinum mastering engineer's master?? ($300 for one song...)

You'll have to tune into this week's Radium POW! to find out...

It's a Mastering shootout!

#mastering #mixingandmastering #audioengineer #recording #musicproduction
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Big fan of this plug-in BUT, let's not forget your mixes are always on point as well! Definitely allows Master Plan to do its thing. Appreciate the walkthrough

gabecarmonamusic
Автор

Dude - the MasterPlan sounds better to my ears, and I mean WAY better. Clearer, tighter - much more impact.

dutnakke
Автор

Master A sounded more warm (analog) Master B sounded more open and less low end ( you did that ) LOL

haroldbones
Автор

I preferred B. They both sound great and I'd be happy with either. It's insane what some of these new plugins are capable of.

saxongroove
Автор

First thing....that song is hooky af 👏👏 But ya....B Masterplan. What a time to be a musician!

EZEonIon
Автор

Wow insane plugin! And great demo thanks man. Definitely gonna grab this one

vermyllionbass
Автор

Yeah, love the MasterPlan Magic. My thinking process with all this: If I know the mastering people on a personal level (I don't), have worked with them and if they knew what kind of stuff I would throw at them on a regular basis, I'm sure they would be able to really, really fine-tune a track, but just sending a song / album to a master house, adding one or two sentences with what matters most to me....well, still doing that, but as I learn more (thank you for making this a great tutorial of MasterPlan ;) I will go the alternative route exclusively - soon.

SpacemanTed
Автор

A is more focused and more punch. B more exciting and modern sounding mostly because you brought up the sides. Sides are easy to bring up, so would be interesting to compare them with the same width.

EricLumiereMusic
Автор

I'm so jealous of your high vocal harmonies BD. Thanks for the MP demo. Do you ever go on podcasts? It would be interesting to hear an interview. Please keep the videos coming

dougpopejoy
Автор

I preferred A, barely and likely just a matter of taste. I liked the thickness of the low mids in A but I think they were a little too much - yet are a little too thin in B. Using Master Plan and keeping your low eq and/or bumping thickness would probably make me pretty happy there. I also felt B had a little sharper transient attack - something I’d probably use the tape feature on but slider mostly to the left (tight). I own Master Plan and use it often, it is a great tool! Both masters sounded great, and the song itself is good stuff too! Well done bro

kshep
Автор

A warmer and deeper, B cleaner and thinner

eiom
Автор

Love this review it actually convinced me to buy the plug-in

Vybescube
Автор

Such a groovy track ha, nice work on this master. Master Plan is a phenomenal plugin.

TRXST.ISSUES
Автор

I love this plugin since I first used It 🧡

-Deena.
Автор

Master A sounds more professionally mastered, clean, balanced, and really radio ready! 🔥💯

DeeBeEatin
Автор

Master B sounds much cleaner to me. I can feel the separation between the elements.
Sounds the best to me.
Just wowwww!!!

josrud
Автор

I liked Master B best! Thank you for this review. ✨

mariapaganmusic
Автор

Master B sounds better but has some slight harsh, metallic sound, it's probably Master Plan. That's what I don't like about it, Exonic Ai Master is similar, sounds fantastic but there is some metallic sound that it introduces that I hate. Slate FG-X 2 still rules the roost IMO, followed by Ozone.

DVNT
Автор

Master A. It's Just more natural to my Ears the Analog

michealhammonds
Автор

Thanks for this, I love that tune. Honestly it was Master A for me, I felt it had more glue and the bass was sitting better to my ears. Played it again and I thought B was better, how helpful am I?

petergedd