Australia's Online 'Safety' Bill

preview_player
Показать описание
#LNPHateFreeSpeech

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The infantilization of the Australian public with this bill is cyber abuse and harassment. Every Australian politician who has supported or voted for this bill should have a complaint filed against them accordingly. Let them live by their own standards, while you reach out to their voters to replace them in primaries or whatever Democratic form of consent consent of members of parties is normal in the antipodes

ronmaximilian
Автор

There is no point in attempting to have a liberal democracy without free speech.

noquarteratall
Автор

“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery” - Thomas Jefferson

baxterwise
Автор

Who’s moral standards? Whoever is in power. Bruz is going to use this…

SimonCoulton
Автор

They don’t understand what they’re doing. A society seeking absolute purity and absolute safety will spiral downwards into the exact opposite.

notreallyablessing
Автор

I would like to see their definitions of 'ordinary adult'

SmashedHatProject
Автор

The dangerous part is this trend of laws that use standards of subjective interpretation... from who takes offense, to who is scared, to whatever else you please, this needs to die, soon, or we'll start to fall into a dystopia where presumption of guilt starts to become the norm because of the same reason that laws that factor intent into their calculations are so difficult to enforce...

Avigorus
Автор

This is first time I'm hearing about this law, from a comedian! This is probably why people loosing faith on main stream media! Time to disrupt media! Please someone disrupt it. Most important thing they will do.

technobd
Автор

I believe In complete free speech, as long as it's legal and doesn't Threaten physical harm.
No matter how offensive.
Your feelings are not real and can't be put on a scale of harm and damage.

gameoverwehaveeverypixelco
Автор

"Is being offensive online illegal now?"
Oh boy, been like that in Britain for a while now technically. Welcome to the club I guess.

tinyprawnie
Автор

Jordan Peterson said it best, “in order to think, you have to risk being offensive”

favouritejay
Автор

When you craft a bill specifically to arrest Friendly Jordies. *john Kackling in Italian

MrHidePatten
Автор

As an ex whistleblower, the “animal” company I spoke against has political connections and this bill would have stopped me speaking out, as they found it, umm offensive I spoke the truth.. what a world we are in..

Thanks mate, you crack me up 🌄✌️🇦🇺🤠🐾🤷🏼‍♂️🦘

Australiantourforyourdog
Автор

Those who would sacrifice liberty for "safety" deserve neither.
"for your safety" = 'so we can control you'

Aliens-Are-Our-Friends
Автор

Thank you.
I called someone on FB "smart guy", sarcasm, and got banned 7 days for Bullying. Bullying bad so they just widen the definitions to encompass the things they want banned... Good thing I left both FB and Twitter 4 years ago. All I have now is a trolling account with 0 friends.

frgl
Автор

You're free as long as you stand in line and don't question the powers that be.

roach
Автор

Dang that lawsuit really did a lot to jordan didn't it?

Also, "I recommend you read this piece of legislation"
"I read all 200 pages of this legislation"

anguscos
Автор

I agree with you neel. Great input, thanks for putting more light into this subject before it’s too late

acxeld
Автор

A very reasonable, considered and fair assessment Neel.

At it's core though this is the same argument/commentary ad infinitum.
"let's stop bad things" ... "who decides which things are bad?" This is a never-ending debate, as it should be. The problem is that the real issues START when the ability to debate ENDS. And that's where this slippery slope is headed.

Also, totally agree that most of the legislation and the work of this office is (objectively) very beneficial to society.
Eg; Don't bully kids into early mental health issues or self-harm. Don't share intimate photos of an ex out of anger. etc etc. Most strongly agree with these controls. It's where we draw the line to limit the ability to censor that is problematic.

scarymonster
Автор

200 pages? I'll take your word for it.

seanwoods
visit shbcf.ru