Rate of Climb Misconception | Altitude AND Speed!

preview_player
Показать описание

Check out cool military and civilian aircraft models here (supports the channel):

0:00 - Introduction
0:21 - Method Exploration
2:05 - Missing Link!
4:42 - Thanks for watching!

Rate of climb misconception and missing link explained and demonstrated!

Follow me on Twitch!

End screen music:
Bitch Lasagna by PewDiePie x Party In Backyard

New video every other Friday!

Like and Subscribe for more!
%----------------------------------------------------------------------%
Useful links:

Maneuvering Energy Retention spreadsheet:

Sea level speed spreadsheet:

MEC and climb spreadsheet:

Link to my Discord:

Follow me on Twitch:

Follow me on Twitter:

Second Channel:

Overlay:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I generally prefer to climb a little faster than is efficient so I'm less likely to get jumped slow

silverfortytwo
Автор

Yesss graph give me more graphs I love it

hansm_
Автор

no dont tell them, i love when someone think they had advantage over me just because they were slightly higher than me, and when i put my plane straight zoom climb into them, they are hopeless because they had no speed even to react

arternativeyt
Автор

Makes me wanna open matlab and find the most efficient walking speed/calorie burn to get to class

sillyrabbit
Автор

I just happen to have finished teaching the relationship between work, mechanical energy and generated heat to my physics students, so I'm very familiar with those concepts but I never considered this about optimal climb speeds. Super informative, thanks a lot!

theofthebeast
Автор

Adam I just wanna say you're combing physics with my favorite video game is really keeping me interested in math lol. Physics is more fun when it's cool airplanes involved. Keep it up man, great work.

astrotrek
Автор

You showed a very good point and explained it well. Although I disagree with your wording - the 250 IAS P-47 still *climbs* better than the 300 IAS P-47 (as shown by the altitude against time graph), but the 300 IAS P-47 has more *energy* coming out of its climb. The 300 IAS P-47 climbs worse than the 250 IAS P-47 but has a little more energy than it (as climb is strictly speaking about altitude, not energy). But I will be sure to remember to climb a little faster.

victory
Автор

Adam. You usually have the slogan of "Be useful!" or something like that. Air RB.
1- Can you explain what type of planes and/or what behaviours do you deem useful?
2- What plane classes fall into which category of usefullness or the opposite? Also detailing which get airspawns, which don't.
3- How can you make otherwise non-usefull planes useful? What requirements should the said plane be adept at?
4- How to make otherwise useful planes even more useful? Perhaps low altitude fighters bombing ground targets before dogfighting?
5- What not to do so one doesn't make an otherwise useful plane non-useful?
6- What should an ideal squad composition be like or comprised of?
7- What's your opinion on slightly heavier twin engine planes which could technically take down foes?

rudolphantler
Автор

Adam we re going in a lockdown 2 days from know ( i live in Greece). Please provide more pvp gameplay asap ( a stream will also suffice) . Thanks in advance ;)

gpapazac
Автор

adam ur video, granted, and my interest in planes and war thunder made me take the aeronautical engineering curriculum at my uni, this will be interesting for my classes keep it up

ZeVulj
Автор

I had your video when I played today. Both fighters and bombers. I found concentrating on keeping the speed up rather than attitude worked. Not by much; but worked. Those fast climbing fighters of the opposition weren’t quite so high. Thanks very much.

nairb-dsvn
Автор

Every aircraft has a best rate of climb (Vy) and best angle of climb (Vx) which is calculated based on avaliable horsepower and total weight. Best rate gives you best time to altitude while best angle gives best altitude over given horizontal distance. All u need to do is point the nose to hit that speed IAS right from take off

dannycross
Автор

why do i watch these when i have no clue what is being talked about lol

NoahR-zd
Автор

Very nice, short video Adam! One thing i did not understand: while the altitude increases the plane needs to accelerate because of lower air density, but with lower drag the amount of energy required to go at higher TAS at higher altitude is lower.

ferrarisuper
Автор

I'm reminded a lot of Eugene M. Cliff's paper on energy state models.

isabuckles
Автор

I got a video Idea. Bullets should fly Further at high altitude due to reduced drag. Could be an intresting short video.

twister
Автор

I DID learn something. I've been climbing at a 265kph IAS. I'll have to start trying 300. Ky main issue is coming up against aircraft who I'm holding elevation advantage over, but are able to snap nose up for a good burst (i.e. yak3), and who seem to retain their energy even after the drastic nose up climb to engage me

yubisnake
Автор

Great video; squeezing performance out of aircraft can be very fulfilling

OneMoreDesu
Автор

wow your channel is very nice, love the merch aswell

Ravenwood
Автор

Make a video Reviewing the F8F-1(B), and dont stop posting videos, i enjoy to much your work.✌️

FRDDPFAL
join shbcf.ru