'Copyright Troll' Richard Liebowitz Sanctioned by Court AGAIN

preview_player
Показать описание
After filing 1,110 copyright infringement lawsuits in under two years, you'd think you might make some mistakes. And that the court might notice. Several times.

#copyrighttroll #richardliebowtiz #sanctions

Thumbnail composed from:

* MERCH *
Our Teespring Store is open!

* COMMUNITY! *
Support more videos!

* THANK YOU SUPPORTERS! *
October 2019 supporters:

Channel Sponsor!
Joshua Davis
TandaPay

October $50+ Supporters:, joetyson, Aspernari, John Steel, Gavin Barnard, Eevi, Kyle Mudrak, Michael Pearce, Spirit Bear, Jan Negrey, Daniel Perez, Snorre Wisotzky, Joe Tyson, blackleaf, Benjamin Hitov

October $5+ Supporters:, Arron Washington, Richard Fournier, Keith Marrocco, Georg Monsen, Dustin Rodriguez, Fatal Foxtrot, Cash Steel, Beef, Cindy Campbell, Brian Flowers, Ornithoper, Hayden Ainger, Justin Pomeroy, Christen C Cloar, Lydia Collinson, NotMike, JH, Stephen Bank, Arya, Evan Burdge, Michael Morris, Mark Randall, Richard Shotwell, Paul Bible, Emeric Stexen, Nicholas Romano, Sarah Gerweck, Matthew East, Michael Potter, Casey Smyth, Pat Delaney, Michael Howard, Mario Bonales, Michael Kenton, Euchale, Lauren, charlieabelar, Vaylenisme, Renee Starling, Brody Eastwood, Ian McDonald, Jamie Sawyer, Marcus Agehall, Joe Roberts, Sokar117, Jonathan Robillard, Henrik Eriksson, Amanda Gillies, Sheila Boettcher, Derresh, Scott, Justin Waddell, Tim Springer, Zzyzx Wolfe, Andrew Sellers, Vienticus, Matthew, Camilla Sandman, Del, Nathaniel Cherry, Tony Cruickshank, Zoe, Gregory Ford, TwixOps, Druid, Kari Sunderland, BodhyOhs, Richard Jeffery, Simon Dompeling, Jason Lingle, Christoph Bolliger, JAXMerrick, Bryan Mitchell, CivMaster, Tron Bårdgård, Kasierith Atrovska, Oisin Creaner, Andrew Spahr, Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, Stephen Christopher, Jerry Knight, Daniel Kertesz, TEEKAY, Stefan Persson, Edward & Hila Goikhman, Frederick Cooper, Wes Morrison, Casey Kikendall, Keith Myers, Eric Johnfelt, HenTropy, Carla Jean Lauter, Juliusz Wilczynski, CombatZAK, Alys McClelland, Catherine Tetzlaff, Jaimeson LaLone, Dan Chevrie, Alexander Sihn, Kate Rijacki Ledum, Olav, Darkwolf, Naomi Pool, SJ Zero, Andrew Reid, David McGuire Jr., KnifeEdge, EnvyingWrath, Brandon, sehro, Brian Rossman, Steven Hess, FunnyHats, Rob Frawley 2nd, allquixotic, Ana Razo, Lord bork, Chris Lindsay, Albert Demello, Haris Bukic, Caleb Veenstra, Seranata, Rico Robbins, Kean Maizels, Durga Devi, Anthony Webb, Mark Curtis, JOSEPH ALEXANDER BROWN, RedR0ze, Bernard Saturday, Scott Inwood, Euan C, Evan Foster, Philip Robb, Nathaniel Reindl, Josey Howarth, Kai Raphahn, Andrew "FastLizard4" Adams, Jesse Stam, Gumblejak, Schawn Schoch, Håkan Andersson, Powers Bilodeau, Dave Vike, JP Stone, Si Wellings, Daniel A Carey, Robert Balayan, Mitchell Thatcher, majikthise, foonix, TheEuphoGuy, rfc805, Daniel Ducharme, Ph.D., Roger Chen, DreamerDon, Gail Myers, Michael Scheliga, Georgio Mosqueda, Marco Cavatto, Martin Rafferty, WhiskersIsCat, Jonathan Gaffers, Anonymous Lizard, Biking With Panda, Kevin Welsh, Schuyler Rowe, Brian, Pamalam, Matthew Bertrand, Mathew Billman, Jack Draak, Cristian Smith, piparalegal2019, Vincent Baier, Michal Kawiak, anthony corrado, Y'all Ain't Right, EZ3ddie, Frank, witch'sFISTS, Adam Greene, Karl Martin Wennerström, Pierre Hugo, DyneOnline, Jenny Yim, Lane Mortensen, Jeffrey Teekell
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm surprised copyright trolling is not illegal as a type of fraud or extortion.

cpcupcake
Автор

Extortion under the threat of legal fees, clogging the legal system for personal profit, a parasite through and through. Only a psychopath would fall so low, I hope.

kevenharvey
Автор

"Emily Ratajkowski's new DNKY ad is just her walking a dog in lingerie." What I want to know is why was the dog wearing lingerie? I love dangling participles.

toxigenic
Автор

I take it he never realized this could potentially become a fast track to disbarment?

crimsonhalo
Автор

Let me see if i understand correctly :
The reconsideration memorandum's essence is that the defendant allegedly knew about Getty but didnt asked about it during the discovery period?

Like in South Park when Butters didnt tell anyone about his future self living with him because nobody asked?

dynadd
Автор

Given Liebowitz was dealing with a case a day it would be interesting to know how many hours he was claiming for each case.

richardfarrer
Автор

I'd like to declare before the court that the images in question are, in fact, quite lovely.

othertalk
Автор

The notice of motion for reconsideration’s arguments look to amount to ‘they didn’t ask’.

To use the courts term, that seems a lame argument.

Maddness
Автор

Thankyou Leonard for using a green screen, its resolved the ability to read along with the text and still have you onscreen without your frame blocking the text too much

DanafoxyVixen
Автор

The video quality was excellent, and greenscreen use was perfect. Editing was not noticeable, which is how it should be.
Content was great as always. This channel just gets better & better.

Soggy-In-Seattle
Автор

Doesn’t the fact that they filed discovery documents involving Getty licensing of *other* images, while *not* filing the corresponding documents for the allegedly infringed images simply *underscore* the nature of the plaintiff’s failure to produce the documents during discovery? It would, in fact simply illustrate that, in the process of gathering documents from/about the specific topic, I ignored the duty to provide the documents related to the *actual* issue at hand.

If I’m alleging that you stole my car, and I produce evidence of ownership of dozens of other, similar cars, but *fail* to produce evidence of ownership for the allegedly stolen car, that isn’t a simple oversight. That is the intentional and willful failure to produce the *most* relevant support for my claim.

Vessekx
Автор

How do attorneys that engage in this behavior maintain their standing in the relevant Bar Associations?

JosephComstock
Автор

I love that you have to add that there were three emojis as part of the quote from the model.


Edit: I don't think I've seen a video on youtube or anywhere that mentions lace underwear as much as this. I'm amazed everyone was able to concentrate on the case!

benjones
Автор

So let's unpack this. Somebody allegedly steals ( I'm guessing) about $300worth of work from a small businessman and that (if we take the bond amount and multiply by two to account for both sides) requires the expenditure of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS to be properly and competently litigated.

No small business person can afford such a risk. Best case, the alleged victim receives a few hundred dollars in damages on a $50, 000 investment. If the publisher "wins", a $50, 000 defense yields a PARTIAL reimbursement of costs. Years down the road.

So thieves steal with impunity. Publishers (honest ones) live in constant fear of being destroyed by a difference of opinion on fair use. And on top of all that, we have trolls. We couldn't build a more vile and corrupt system if we explicitly tried.

I've said many times that copyright infringement should be a criminal matter. Taxpayer-funded police should enforce the laws. Violators should go to jail for long enough to deter their behavior and there needs to be a big, very bright line around fair use so that publishers don't have to bet their very existence on day-to-day decisions. Others may propose differing solutions, but damn it, we need to do SOMETHING!

Until then, worrying about trolling is like cleaning a single bacterium from a diseased cesspool.

carlseibert
Автор

How long will it be before all of this trolls cases get auto-bounced? Or is that even a possibility?

vawlkus
Автор

Nice that they throw the attorney under the bus and not the plaintiff.

cpt_nordbart
Автор

Why hadn't the court asked the Bar to revoke his licence yet?
Seems to me that if all these judges get pissed off by his conduct, pressure on the Bar should build pretty rapidly, no?

MrNicoJac
Автор

At what point does the judge refer him to the ethics board?

sheppycider
Автор

As far as how the model got certain photos of herself, I would think they would have been supplied by DKNY itself right? You can go through footage bit by bit and get a "still" image. I would imagine that besides money the model also had a deal with DKNY that she could use any photos of herself on her social media or perhaps only specifically to Instagram and to promote the DKNY shoot (which it seems like she did). Considering that the cameramen for the filming and any photographers would all be working to get the best angle, lighting, etc, is it too much of a stretch to say that some of the images derived from footage and that some of the images captured by photographers would be identical?

matthewbrasel
Автор

I think the script needed a few more revisions. About 10 minutes in I lost track of who the clients were and the relevance of the specific point in dispute.

b.s.
welcome to shbcf.ru